{"title":"What Should be a Rational Decision-Making Process about Screening Programs?","authors":"A. Ainabekova, Dilara Agibayeva, Samal Danbayeva","doi":"10.32921/2225-9929-2021-3-43-26-34","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this policy brief researched the experience of various countries of the world in making decisions about screening programs, as well as comprehensively analyzed the domestic experience in implementing screening programs.In Kazakhstan, the types of diseases for which it is necessary to introduce screening, as well as the rules for organizing screening, are determined by the decision of the leadership of the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Kazakhstan, based on consideration of the relevant departments and conclusion of specialized institutions. At the same time, the main attention is paid to the screening examinations themselves, and insufficient work is being done in the direction of scientific and methodological support for screening programs.The authors believe that it is necessary to develop evidence-based screening recommendations for the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Kazakhstan, as well as to use international criteria in making decisions regarding the introduction of new screening programs. It is necessary to provide a methodological decision-making process, involving independent organizations for evaluating screening programs, the public, and all stakeholders","PeriodicalId":11852,"journal":{"name":"Ethiopian Journal of Health Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethiopian Journal of Health Development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32921/2225-9929-2021-3-43-26-34","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
In this policy brief researched the experience of various countries of the world in making decisions about screening programs, as well as comprehensively analyzed the domestic experience in implementing screening programs.In Kazakhstan, the types of diseases for which it is necessary to introduce screening, as well as the rules for organizing screening, are determined by the decision of the leadership of the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Kazakhstan, based on consideration of the relevant departments and conclusion of specialized institutions. At the same time, the main attention is paid to the screening examinations themselves, and insufficient work is being done in the direction of scientific and methodological support for screening programs.The authors believe that it is necessary to develop evidence-based screening recommendations for the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Kazakhstan, as well as to use international criteria in making decisions regarding the introduction of new screening programs. It is necessary to provide a methodological decision-making process, involving independent organizations for evaluating screening programs, the public, and all stakeholders
期刊介绍：
The Ethiopian Journal of Health Development is a multi and interdisciplinary platform that provides space for public health experts in academics, policy and programs to share empirical evidence to contribute to health development agenda.
We publish original research articles, reviews, brief communications and commentaries on public health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to the scholars in the field of public health, social sciences and humanities, health practitioners and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of public health from a wide range of fields: epidemiology, environmental health, health economics, reproductive health, behavioral sciences, nutrition, psychiatry, social pharmacy, medical anthropology, medical sociology, clinical psychology and wide arrays of social sciences and humanities.
The journal publishes the following types of contribution:
1) Peer-reviewed original research articles and critical or analytical reviews in any area of social public health. These papers may be up to 3,500 words excluding abstract, tables, and references. Papers below this limit are preferred.
2) Peer-reviewed short reports of research findings on topical issues or published articles of between 2000 and 4000 words.
3) Brief communications, and commentaries debating on particular areas of focus, and published alongside, selected articles.
4) Special Issues bringing together collections of papers on a particular theme, and usually guest edited.
5) Editorial that flags critical issues of public health debate for policy, program and scientific consumption or further debate
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
