Comparison of Radiographic Singh Index with Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Scan in Diagnosing Osteoporosis

Furqan R Mir, Imran Nazir, Mohammad Naseed
{"title":"Comparison of Radiographic Singh Index with Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Scan in Diagnosing Osteoporosis","authors":"Furqan R Mir, Imran Nazir, Mohammad Naseed","doi":"10.4103/MTSM.MTSM_41_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the accuracy of radiographic Singh index (SI) with respect to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan in diagnosing osteoporosis. Materials and Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study on 100 postmenopausal women in the Department of Radiodiagnosis, SKIMS, Soura, Srinagar, from June 2019 to December 2019. We obtained right or left standard anteroposterior hip radiograph in each patient and compared its SI grade to the densitometry results obtained from the DEXA study of the corresponding hip. Results: Out of the selected patients, 7% had DEXA bone mineral density (BMD) values in normal range (T-score ≤1), 81% in osteopenic range (T-score >1.00–<2.5), and 12% in osteoporotic range (T-score ≥2.5). There was no statistically significant correlation (r = −0.108, P = 0.286) between SI grade and WHO BMD category (normal, osteopenia, or osteoporosis). There was no statistically significant correlation (r = 0.191, P = 0.057) between the SI grade and the mean absolute DEXA BMD value. There was also no statistically significant correlation (r = −0.195, P = 0.052) between SI grade and mean DEXA T-score. Conclusion: Our study found a poor correlation between radiographic SI and DEXA densitometry results. We concluded that the SI cannot be used as a substitute for DEXA study in diagnosing osteoporosis.","PeriodicalId":32519,"journal":{"name":"Matrix Science Medica","volume":"197 1","pages":"17 - 20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Matrix Science Medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/MTSM.MTSM_41_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the accuracy of radiographic Singh index (SI) with respect to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan in diagnosing osteoporosis. Materials and Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study on 100 postmenopausal women in the Department of Radiodiagnosis, SKIMS, Soura, Srinagar, from June 2019 to December 2019. We obtained right or left standard anteroposterior hip radiograph in each patient and compared its SI grade to the densitometry results obtained from the DEXA study of the corresponding hip. Results: Out of the selected patients, 7% had DEXA bone mineral density (BMD) values in normal range (T-score ≤1), 81% in osteopenic range (T-score >1.00–<2.5), and 12% in osteoporotic range (T-score ≥2.5). There was no statistically significant correlation (r = −0.108, P = 0.286) between SI grade and WHO BMD category (normal, osteopenia, or osteoporosis). There was no statistically significant correlation (r = 0.191, P = 0.057) between the SI grade and the mean absolute DEXA BMD value. There was also no statistically significant correlation (r = −0.195, P = 0.052) between SI grade and mean DEXA T-score. Conclusion: Our study found a poor correlation between radiographic SI and DEXA densitometry results. We concluded that the SI cannot be used as a substitute for DEXA study in diagnosing osteoporosis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
影像学辛格指数与双能x线吸收仪诊断骨质疏松症的比较
目的:本研究的目的是评估放射学辛格指数(SI)相对于双能x线吸收仪(DEXA)扫描诊断骨质疏松症的准确性。材料和方法:我们于2019年6月至2019年12月对斯利那加苏拉SKIMS放射诊断科的100名绝经后妇女进行了横断面研究。我们对每位患者进行了右侧或左侧标准髋关节正位x线片,并将其SI等级与相应髋关节DEXA研究获得的密度测量结果进行了比较。结果:选取的患者中,7%的患者DEXA骨密度(BMD)值在正常范围(t评分≤1),81%的患者在骨质减少范围(t评分>1.00 ~ <2.5),12%的患者在骨质疏松范围(t评分≥2.5)。SI分级与WHO BMD分类(正常、骨质减少或骨质疏松)之间无统计学意义相关(r = - 0.108, P = 0.286)。SI分级与DEXA平均绝对BMD值之间无统计学意义(r = 0.191, P = 0.057)。SI等级与DEXA平均t -评分之间也无统计学意义(r = - 0.195, P = 0.052)。结论:我们的研究发现放射成像SI和DEXA密度测量结果之间的相关性很差。我们的结论是SI不能代替DEXA研究诊断骨质疏松症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Exploring the Impact of Lead on Health and Strategies to Prevent the Adverse Consequences The Burden of Respiratory Disease in Childhood The Ethicality of Genetically Modified Organisms: Is the Use and Proliferation of Genetically Modified Organisms Ethical? Variations in Plasma Glucose, Testosterone, and Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha in Relationship with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome and Viral Seromarkers in Infertile Women: A Case–Control Observational Study Application of CRISPR/Cas12a for SARS-CoV-2 Nucleic Acid Detection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1