Application of Grounded Theory Methodology Using CEFR in the Field of Language Testing

P. R. Goundar
{"title":"Application of Grounded Theory Methodology Using CEFR in the Field of Language Testing","authors":"P. R. Goundar","doi":"10.5539/res.v15n1p1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of grounded theory methodology (GTM) is rare in the field of language testing as indicated by the literature survey. However, this study used GTM in a study on first year undergraduate students writing skills in Fiji. The study used the Common European Framework for Reference (CEFR) to evaluate student writing skills successfully at a university in Fiji. The CEFR is one of the most comprehensive frameworks for language evaluation that has been widely used by language testing organisations mostly in Western countries. This paper takes a methodological position rather than looking at empirical data from the research to engage novice users of GTM to apply it to the field of linguistics, specifically to language testing research. It provides step-by-step guide and a discussion of relevant literature that attest to the use of GTM in linguistics. The methodological contributions and the unique data set of the study will advance scholarly and social policy conversations on this topic. The study makes an original contribution to the body of knowledge on how grounded theory research methodologies can be applied to a longitudinal language testing research context. At present, language testing in higher education relies on data from conventional formative and normative assessments. Approaches such as grounded theory and longitudinal research design have rarely been used. The paper will benefit novice researchers such as Masters and PhD scholars as well as policy makers in applying the methodology to their studies.","PeriodicalId":92134,"journal":{"name":"Review of European studies","volume":"87 3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of European studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5539/res.v15n1p1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The use of grounded theory methodology (GTM) is rare in the field of language testing as indicated by the literature survey. However, this study used GTM in a study on first year undergraduate students writing skills in Fiji. The study used the Common European Framework for Reference (CEFR) to evaluate student writing skills successfully at a university in Fiji. The CEFR is one of the most comprehensive frameworks for language evaluation that has been widely used by language testing organisations mostly in Western countries. This paper takes a methodological position rather than looking at empirical data from the research to engage novice users of GTM to apply it to the field of linguistics, specifically to language testing research. It provides step-by-step guide and a discussion of relevant literature that attest to the use of GTM in linguistics. The methodological contributions and the unique data set of the study will advance scholarly and social policy conversations on this topic. The study makes an original contribution to the body of knowledge on how grounded theory research methodologies can be applied to a longitudinal language testing research context. At present, language testing in higher education relies on data from conventional formative and normative assessments. Approaches such as grounded theory and longitudinal research design have rarely been used. The paper will benefit novice researchers such as Masters and PhD scholars as well as policy makers in applying the methodology to their studies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
扎根理论方法在语言测试中的应用
文献调查表明,扎根理论方法论在语言测试领域的应用并不多见。然而,本研究使用GTM对斐济一年级本科生的写作技巧进行了研究。这项研究使用欧洲共同参考框架(CEFR)成功地评估了斐济一所大学学生的写作技能。CEFR是最全面的语言评估框架之一,已被西方国家的语言测试机构广泛使用。本文采取方法论的立场,而不是从研究中寻找经验数据,以吸引GTM的新手用户将其应用于语言学领域,特别是语言测试研究。它提供了一步一步的指导和相关文献的讨论,证明GTM在语言学中的使用。该研究在方法论上的贡献和独特的数据集将推动关于这一主题的学术和社会政策对话。该研究对如何将扎根理论研究方法应用于纵向语言测试研究背景的知识体系做出了原创性贡献。目前,高等教育中的语言测试依赖于传统的形成性和规范性评估数据。扎根理论和纵向研究设计等方法很少被使用。这篇论文将使硕士和博士学者等新手研究人员以及政策制定者在将该方法应用到他们的研究中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Determinants of the Profitability and Stability of Euro Area Banks During the Ice Age of Interest Rates Navigating Investment Waters: Uncovering the Impact of Financial Factors on Business Behavior in Small Economies The Nuanced Footprints of Covid-19 Predicament on Labour Market Integration of Migrants in Finland Reviewer Acknowledgements for Review of European Studies, Vol. 15, No. 4 Public Debt and Economic Growth after Covid-19 in Europe: Challenges and Policy Implications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1