The EU’s Response to the COVID-19 Crisis and the Trajectory of Fiscal Integration in Europe: Between Continuity and Rupture

P. Dermine
{"title":"The EU’s Response to the COVID-19 Crisis and the Trajectory of Fiscal Integration in Europe: Between Continuity and Rupture","authors":"P. Dermine","doi":"10.54648/leie2020020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article offers a first analysis of the EU’s fiscal response to the COVID-19 crisis. Beyond an account of the main initiatives of which it is comprised (the suspension of the Stability and Growth Pact, the Support to mitigate Unemployment Risks in an Emergency (SURE) instrument and the recovery plan), it provides an assessment of this response’s position in, and likely influence on, the long-term trajectory of economic and fiscal integration in Europe. Analysing its main features and the core issues and challenges it raises, it identifies the elements of continuity and rupture which characterize this response, the legacies on which it builds, and the shifts and changes that it embodies. The article shows that, as a policy initiative which in many regards breaks away from past practices and orientations, the EU’s fiscal response to COVID-19 presents novel, disruptive features, which raise new legal questions, and open new avenues for exploration. It also reveals that next to clear elements of rupture, this response is also largely embedded into the wider, pre-existing policy framework of EU economic governance which we inherited from the Eurozone crisis. In many regards, it continues the institutional philosophy of that system, and perpetuates the main constitutional challenges that it raises.\nEuropean Union, COVID-19, fiscal response, recovery plan, transformations, legacies","PeriodicalId":42718,"journal":{"name":"Legal Issues of Economic Integration","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legal Issues of Economic Integration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/leie2020020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This article offers a first analysis of the EU’s fiscal response to the COVID-19 crisis. Beyond an account of the main initiatives of which it is comprised (the suspension of the Stability and Growth Pact, the Support to mitigate Unemployment Risks in an Emergency (SURE) instrument and the recovery plan), it provides an assessment of this response’s position in, and likely influence on, the long-term trajectory of economic and fiscal integration in Europe. Analysing its main features and the core issues and challenges it raises, it identifies the elements of continuity and rupture which characterize this response, the legacies on which it builds, and the shifts and changes that it embodies. The article shows that, as a policy initiative which in many regards breaks away from past practices and orientations, the EU’s fiscal response to COVID-19 presents novel, disruptive features, which raise new legal questions, and open new avenues for exploration. It also reveals that next to clear elements of rupture, this response is also largely embedded into the wider, pre-existing policy framework of EU economic governance which we inherited from the Eurozone crisis. In many regards, it continues the institutional philosophy of that system, and perpetuates the main constitutional challenges that it raises. European Union, COVID-19, fiscal response, recovery plan, transformations, legacies
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧盟应对新冠肺炎危机与欧洲财政一体化轨迹:在延续与破裂之间
本文首次分析了欧盟应对COVID-19危机的财政措施。除了介绍报告所包含的主要举措(《稳定与增长公约》的中止、《紧急情况下减轻失业风险的支持》工具和复苏计划)之外,报告还评估了这一应对措施在欧洲经济和财政一体化的长期轨迹中的地位及其可能产生的影响。在分析了其主要特征及其引发的核心问题和挑战后,作者确定了这种反应的连续性和断裂性要素,它所建立的遗产,以及它所体现的转变和变化。文章认为,作为一项在许多方面与过去的做法和方向不同的政策举措,欧盟的财政应对新冠肺炎呈现出新的、颠覆性的特点,提出了新的法律问题,并开辟了新的探索途径。它还表明,除了明显的破裂因素外,这种反应也在很大程度上嵌入了我们从欧元区危机中继承下来的欧盟经济治理的更广泛、预先存在的政策框架。在许多方面,它延续了该制度的体制哲学,并使它提出的主要宪法挑战永久化。欧盟、2019冠状病毒病、财政应对、复苏计划、转型、遗留问题
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊最新文献
The EU’s Anti-coercion Instrument: A Return of Unlawful Unilateral Trade Countermeasures in Disguise? Editorial: Investment Protection in an Integrated Europe – The Non-Enforcement of Intra-EU Investment Arbitration Awards as the Ultimate Test Case for Strasbourg’s Deference Doctrines Why Do (High-Income) Countries Wish to Green Their Trade Agreements? The Application of Regulation 452/2019 in Response to Chinese Foreign Direct Investment The ESM Reform and Its Missing Legitimacy in Non-Euro Area Member States
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1