Is “Gender Ideology” Western Colonialism?

IF 1.8 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY TSQ-Transgender Studies Quarterly Pub Date : 2022-08-01 DOI:10.1215/23289252-9836036
Jenny Andrine Madsen Evang
{"title":"Is “Gender Ideology” Western Colonialism?","authors":"Jenny Andrine Madsen Evang","doi":"10.1215/23289252-9836036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n How should we interrogate and oppose the current anti-gender misappropriation of postcolonial thought and struggles? Recently, we have seen a resurgence of organized anti-gender sentiments across Europe and the globe. A specific anti-gender rhetoric of victimization defines so-called Western genderists as a common enemy and colonizing force against “the people.” By focusing on some key European anti-gender actors, this article analyzes the strategic significance of the specific anti-gender assertion that gender is a neocolonial imposition. Beyond examining how the European anti-gender takeover of postcolonial framing is hypocritical—as anti-gender thinkers are themselves invested in the cisheterosexist myth that is perhaps the most colonial of all—the article argues that the misappropriation reveals something central about the racialized imaginary underpinning their rhetoric. They reproduce a racialized hierarchy of biological plasticity that positions white Europeans as both the ultimate saviors and the most vulnerable victims in the face of “genderism.” By unpacking the politics through which European anti-gender actors use the “non-Western” world as a rhetorical ruse to further Western supremacy, the article also shows the danger of the impulse to suspend postcolonial feminist critique in an effort to distance oneself from the anti-gender misappropriation of such theory and to unite around a common liberal front. Instead, it proposes that postcolonial thought is more vital than ever if we are to counter current anti-gender movements, their Islamophobia, and their transphobia.","PeriodicalId":44767,"journal":{"name":"TSQ-Transgender Studies Quarterly","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TSQ-Transgender Studies Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/23289252-9836036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

How should we interrogate and oppose the current anti-gender misappropriation of postcolonial thought and struggles? Recently, we have seen a resurgence of organized anti-gender sentiments across Europe and the globe. A specific anti-gender rhetoric of victimization defines so-called Western genderists as a common enemy and colonizing force against “the people.” By focusing on some key European anti-gender actors, this article analyzes the strategic significance of the specific anti-gender assertion that gender is a neocolonial imposition. Beyond examining how the European anti-gender takeover of postcolonial framing is hypocritical—as anti-gender thinkers are themselves invested in the cisheterosexist myth that is perhaps the most colonial of all—the article argues that the misappropriation reveals something central about the racialized imaginary underpinning their rhetoric. They reproduce a racialized hierarchy of biological plasticity that positions white Europeans as both the ultimate saviors and the most vulnerable victims in the face of “genderism.” By unpacking the politics through which European anti-gender actors use the “non-Western” world as a rhetorical ruse to further Western supremacy, the article also shows the danger of the impulse to suspend postcolonial feminist critique in an effort to distance oneself from the anti-gender misappropriation of such theory and to unite around a common liberal front. Instead, it proposes that postcolonial thought is more vital than ever if we are to counter current anti-gender movements, their Islamophobia, and their transphobia.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“性别意识形态”是西方殖民主义吗?
我们应该如何诘问和反对当前对后殖民思想和斗争的反性别挪用?最近,我们看到欧洲和全球各地有组织的反性别情绪死灰复燃。一种具体的反性别受害修辞将所谓的西方性别主义者定义为反对“人民”的共同敌人和殖民力量。本文通过关注欧洲一些关键的反性别行动者,分析了性别是新殖民主义强加的具体反性别主张的战略意义。除了研究欧洲在后殖民框架下的反性别接管是如何虚伪的——因为反性别思想家们自己也投入到可能是最具殖民主义色彩的异性恋神话中——文章还认为,这种盗用揭示了支撑他们修辞的种族化想象的一些核心问题。他们再现了一种种族化的生物可塑性等级制度,在面对“性别歧视”时,欧洲白人既是最终的救世主,也是最脆弱的受害者。通过揭示欧洲反性别行动者利用“非西方”世界作为进一步提升西方霸权的修辞诡计的政治,文章还显示了暂停后殖民女权主义批评的冲动的危险,这种冲动旨在使自己远离对这种理论的反性别滥用,并团结在一个共同的自由主义阵线周围。相反,它提出,如果我们要对抗当前的反性别运动、他们的伊斯兰恐惧症和变性恐惧症,后殖民思想比以往任何时候都更加重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
TSQ-Transgender Studies Quarterly
TSQ-Transgender Studies Quarterly SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
28.60%
发文量
33
期刊最新文献
Provincializing Trans Studies Staying Backward with the History of Camptown Trans Sex Work “For All the Queer NDN Foster Kids Out There” Whither Trans Studies? Jugando con lenguaje
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1