Forester and Logger Response to Emerald Ash Borer in Massachusetts and Vermont: a Secondary Disturbance

M. Markowski-Lindsay, P. Catanzaro, Amanda Robillard, B. Butler, D. Orwig, A. D’Amato, Jonathan R. Thompson, Danelle M. Laflower, M. G. MacLean, M. Itter
{"title":"Forester and Logger Response to Emerald Ash Borer in Massachusetts and Vermont: a Secondary Disturbance","authors":"M. Markowski-Lindsay, P. Catanzaro, Amanda Robillard, B. Butler, D. Orwig, A. D’Amato, Jonathan R. Thompson, Danelle M. Laflower, M. G. MacLean, M. Itter","doi":"10.1093/jofore/fvad019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Forester and logger responses to the invasive emerald ash borer (EAB) could substantially affect regions across the United States. We analyzed forester and logger responses to EAB in Massachusetts and Vermont, exploring characteristics associated with purposeful targeting of substantial ash properties; managing forests differently because of EAB; and regeneration goals. One-third of respondents increased timber sales on ash properties, motivated by ecological, not economic, impacts of EAB. Nearly 60% said EAB changed their management activity in stands with ash; changes influenced by the ecological impact of EAB and not economic factors. Those influenced by EAB’s ecological impact to choose properties with substantial ash were more likely to have increased harvest area size, sawtimber removal, and harvest intensity. Loggers were more likely than foresters to remove small-diameter ash and low-grade trees. Both rated regenerating economically valuable species well adapted to the site as their highest essential priority.\n Study Implications: There is a finite window to address emerald ash borer (EAB) to sustain ash and its cultural, ecological, and economic benefits. Given the time constraint and limited resources available to address EAB, finding strategic approaches to mitigate EAB impact is critical. This survey sought to understand forester and logger response to EAB; given their impact on the landscape, informing their management strategies is one critical approach to the conservation of ash. Understanding the ecological impact of current management approaches could help optimize silvicultural strategies. Silvicultural strategies mitigating EAB ecological impacts would likely be of greatest interest to foresters and loggers.","PeriodicalId":23386,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Forestry","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Forestry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jofore/fvad019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Forester and logger responses to the invasive emerald ash borer (EAB) could substantially affect regions across the United States. We analyzed forester and logger responses to EAB in Massachusetts and Vermont, exploring characteristics associated with purposeful targeting of substantial ash properties; managing forests differently because of EAB; and regeneration goals. One-third of respondents increased timber sales on ash properties, motivated by ecological, not economic, impacts of EAB. Nearly 60% said EAB changed their management activity in stands with ash; changes influenced by the ecological impact of EAB and not economic factors. Those influenced by EAB’s ecological impact to choose properties with substantial ash were more likely to have increased harvest area size, sawtimber removal, and harvest intensity. Loggers were more likely than foresters to remove small-diameter ash and low-grade trees. Both rated regenerating economically valuable species well adapted to the site as their highest essential priority. Study Implications: There is a finite window to address emerald ash borer (EAB) to sustain ash and its cultural, ecological, and economic benefits. Given the time constraint and limited resources available to address EAB, finding strategic approaches to mitigate EAB impact is critical. This survey sought to understand forester and logger response to EAB; given their impact on the landscape, informing their management strategies is one critical approach to the conservation of ash. Understanding the ecological impact of current management approaches could help optimize silvicultural strategies. Silvicultural strategies mitigating EAB ecological impacts would likely be of greatest interest to foresters and loggers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
马萨诸塞州和佛蒙特州的林务员和伐木工对翡翠灰蛀虫的反应:二次干扰
森林管理员和伐木者对入侵的绿灰螟虫(EAB)的反应可能会对美国各地产生重大影响。我们分析了马萨诸塞州和佛蒙特州的森林管理员和伐木者对EAB的反应,探索了有目的地瞄准大量灰烬特性的相关特征;因EAB而对森林进行不同的管理;以及再生目标。三分之一的受访者增加了灰特性的木材销售,动机是生态,而不是经济,EAB的影响。近60%的人表示,EAB改变了他们对有灰林分的管理活动;受生态影响而非经济因素影响的变化。那些受EAB生态影响而选择大量灰分特性的树木更有可能增加采伐面积、木材采伐量和采伐强度。伐木工比林务员更有可能砍伐小直径的灰树和低等级的树木。两者都将再生具有经济价值的物种视为最重要的优先事项。研究意义:解决绿灰螟(EAB)以维持灰及其文化、生态和经济效益的窗口是有限的。考虑到时间限制和有限的可用资源来解决EAB,找到减轻EAB影响的战略方法至关重要。该调查旨在了解林农和伐木者对EAB的反应;考虑到它们对景观的影响,告知它们的管理策略是保护灰烬的一个关键方法。了解当前管理方法的生态影响有助于优化造林策略。减轻EAB生态影响的造林战略可能是林农和伐木者最感兴趣的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Batı Karadeniz Bölgesi Kazdağı göknarı ormanlarında göknar ökseotu bulunma ve bulaşma durumu: Kökez Orman İşletme Şefliği örneği Hitit metinlerinde orman Almus yöresi doğal doğu kayını meşcerelerinin çap dağılımının Weibull dağılımı ile modellenmesi Türkiye’nin kuzeybatısındaki bir plantasyonda yerli ve egzotik çam türlerinin ibrelerinde görülen fungal endofitler Assessing Mid-rotation Loblolly Pine and Competing Vegetation Responses to Post-thin Fertilization and Herbicide Application in the Southeastern United States
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1