DOES DIGITAL FINANCIAL INCLUSION MATTER FOR BANK RISK-TAKING? EVIDENCE FROM THE DUAL-BANKING SYSTEM

Q2 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Journal of Islamic Monetary Economics and Finance Pub Date : 2021-04-21 DOI:10.21098/JIMF.V7I2.1320
Hasanul Banna, Rabiul Alam
{"title":"DOES DIGITAL FINANCIAL INCLUSION MATTER FOR BANK RISK-TAKING? EVIDENCE FROM THE DUAL-BANKING SYSTEM","authors":"Hasanul Banna, Rabiul Alam","doi":"10.21098/JIMF.V7I2.1320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the nexus between digital financial inclusion (DFI) and levels of bank risk-taking, using a sample of 283 commercial banks (Islamic and conventional) from six countries over the period 2011 to 2019 and deploying panel-corrected standard errors, two-stage least squares-instrumental variables and dynamic panel two-step generalized method of moments estimators. The findings suggest that Islamic banks take more risks than their counterpart conventional banks. The empirical evidence also indicates that an increase in the DFI index score reduces the overall level of bank risktaking and increases that of banking stability for commercial and conventional banks compared to Islamic ones. A strong association between DFI and bank risk-taking suggests that DFI not only reduces the default risk, leverage risk and portfolio risk of banks, but also increases financial mobility in the sample countries. Consequently, an inclusive digitalised banking industry ensures sustainable economic growth, which is likely to help maintain financial sustainability in times of crisis such as the Covid-19 pandemic. Our results are shown to be robust by various robustness checks. The study contributes to both the Islamic and conventional banking, as well as the digital financial inclusion, literature. The findings of the study provide various policy implications for policymakers and standard-setters in the countries examined.","PeriodicalId":31622,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Islamic Monetary Economics and Finance","volume":"172 1","pages":"401-430"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Islamic Monetary Economics and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21098/JIMF.V7I2.1320","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

This paper examines the nexus between digital financial inclusion (DFI) and levels of bank risk-taking, using a sample of 283 commercial banks (Islamic and conventional) from six countries over the period 2011 to 2019 and deploying panel-corrected standard errors, two-stage least squares-instrumental variables and dynamic panel two-step generalized method of moments estimators. The findings suggest that Islamic banks take more risks than their counterpart conventional banks. The empirical evidence also indicates that an increase in the DFI index score reduces the overall level of bank risktaking and increases that of banking stability for commercial and conventional banks compared to Islamic ones. A strong association between DFI and bank risk-taking suggests that DFI not only reduces the default risk, leverage risk and portfolio risk of banks, but also increases financial mobility in the sample countries. Consequently, an inclusive digitalised banking industry ensures sustainable economic growth, which is likely to help maintain financial sustainability in times of crisis such as the Covid-19 pandemic. Our results are shown to be robust by various robustness checks. The study contributes to both the Islamic and conventional banking, as well as the digital financial inclusion, literature. The findings of the study provide various policy implications for policymakers and standard-setters in the countries examined.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数字普惠金融对银行的风险承担有影响吗?来自双重银行体系的证据
本文研究了数字普惠金融(DFI)与银行风险承担水平之间的关系,使用了2011年至2019年期间来自六个国家的283家商业银行(伊斯兰和传统)的样本,并采用了面板修正的标准误差、两阶段最小二乘工具变量和动态面板两步广义矩估计方法。研究结果表明,伊斯兰银行比传统银行承担更多风险。经验证据还表明,与伊斯兰银行相比,DFI指数得分的提高降低了银行冒险的整体水平,并提高了商业银行和传统银行的银行稳定性。DFI与银行风险承担之间的强烈关联表明,DFI不仅降低了银行的违约风险、杠杆风险和投资组合风险,而且还增加了样本国家的金融流动性。因此,包容性的数字化银行业确保了可持续的经济增长,这可能有助于在Covid-19大流行等危机时期保持金融可持续性。通过各种鲁棒性检查,我们的结果显示是鲁棒的。该研究对伊斯兰银行和传统银行以及数字普惠金融文献都有贡献。这项研究的结果为所调查国家的政策制定者和标准制定者提供了各种政策含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
CORPORATE ATTRIBUTES AND BANKRUPTCY PREDICTION: THE CASE OF LISTED HALAL FOOD AND BEVERAGE COMPANIES BUSY COMMISSIONERS AND FIRM PERFORMANCE: DO SHARIAH-COMPLIANT FIRMS MATTER? STABILITY OF SHARIAH-COMPLIANT STOCKS IN INDONESIA, MALAYSIA, AND GCC: THE ROLES OF MONETARY AND FISCAL POLICIES AND CONTAGION REVISITING THE DYNAMIC CONNECTEDNESS, SPILLOVER AND HEDGING OPPORTUNITIES AMONG CRYPTOCURRENCY, COMMODITIES, AND ISLAMIC STOCK MARKETS The THE ROLE OF ISLAMIC FINANCIAL INCLUSION ON POVERTY, INCOME INEQUALITY, AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT IN INDONESIA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1