Philosophical Dimension of Today’s Educational Technologies: Framing Ethical Landscape of the Smart Education Domain

Dmytro Mykhailov
{"title":"Philosophical Dimension of Today’s Educational Technologies: Framing Ethical Landscape of the Smart Education Domain","authors":"Dmytro Mykhailov","doi":"10.18523/2617-1678.2022.9-10.68-75","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although smart education is one of the most rapidly expanding technological practices nowadays, we still don’t know much about the consequences that new educational technologies might have on the future generation of learners. While smart education is often used as an ‘umbrella term’ which covers a wide variety of different trends and approaches in today’s education, it seems useful to narrow the definition of this term before going deeper into the ethical analysis of smart education more in general. Considering this fact, the present paper claims that the smart education domain consists of three main components, namely, smart pedagogy, smart learning, and smart educational technologies. Keeping this in mind in what follows I propose a description of the ethical problems from every component. In the case of smart pedagogy, I emphasize the issue of new responsibilities and new competencies that come with novel digital technologies. In the case of smart learning, I am showing how big data and AI solutions might raise significant privacy issues. Finally, in relation to smart educational technologies, I focus on AI adaptive educational systems which might provide highly personalized educational solutions. Although AI adaptive educational systems can strongly improve the efficiency and interactivity of the learning experience this technological system might also lead to unpredicted consequences related to students’ attention and other cognitive and metacognitive abilities. The present paper also stands in a deep relation to current discussion in contemporary philosophy of technology by questioning the ethical nature of the current digital artifacts. According to many contemporary philosophies of technology digital artifacts such as computer, AI systems and smartphones are not morally neutral. On the contrary, these digital technologies are actively changing our moral behavior, transform our responsibilities and ethical navigation more in general. As I am going to show in the present paper, digital technologies from the domain of smart education are not an exclusion.","PeriodicalId":34696,"journal":{"name":"Naukovi zapiski NaUKMA Filosofiia ta religiieznavstvo","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Naukovi zapiski NaUKMA Filosofiia ta religiieznavstvo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18523/2617-1678.2022.9-10.68-75","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although smart education is one of the most rapidly expanding technological practices nowadays, we still don’t know much about the consequences that new educational technologies might have on the future generation of learners. While smart education is often used as an ‘umbrella term’ which covers a wide variety of different trends and approaches in today’s education, it seems useful to narrow the definition of this term before going deeper into the ethical analysis of smart education more in general. Considering this fact, the present paper claims that the smart education domain consists of three main components, namely, smart pedagogy, smart learning, and smart educational technologies. Keeping this in mind in what follows I propose a description of the ethical problems from every component. In the case of smart pedagogy, I emphasize the issue of new responsibilities and new competencies that come with novel digital technologies. In the case of smart learning, I am showing how big data and AI solutions might raise significant privacy issues. Finally, in relation to smart educational technologies, I focus on AI adaptive educational systems which might provide highly personalized educational solutions. Although AI adaptive educational systems can strongly improve the efficiency and interactivity of the learning experience this technological system might also lead to unpredicted consequences related to students’ attention and other cognitive and metacognitive abilities. The present paper also stands in a deep relation to current discussion in contemporary philosophy of technology by questioning the ethical nature of the current digital artifacts. According to many contemporary philosophies of technology digital artifacts such as computer, AI systems and smartphones are not morally neutral. On the contrary, these digital technologies are actively changing our moral behavior, transform our responsibilities and ethical navigation more in general. As I am going to show in the present paper, digital technologies from the domain of smart education are not an exclusion.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当今教育技术的哲学维度:构建智能教育领域的伦理景观
虽然智能教育是当今发展最迅速的技术实践之一,但我们仍然不太清楚新的教育技术可能对未来一代学习者产生的影响。虽然智能教育经常被用作涵盖当今教育中各种不同趋势和方法的“总括术语”,但在更深入地进行智能教育的伦理分析之前,缩小这个术语的定义似乎是有用的。考虑到这一事实,本文声称智能教育领域由三个主要组成部分组成,即智能教学法、智能学习和智能教育技术。考虑到这一点,接下来我将从每个组成部分对道德问题进行描述。就智能教学法而言,我强调了新数字技术带来的新责任和新能力问题。就智能学习而言,我正在展示大数据和人工智能解决方案如何可能引发重大的隐私问题。最后,关于智能教育技术,我关注人工智能自适应教育系统,它可能提供高度个性化的教育解决方案。虽然人工智能自适应教育系统可以有力地提高学习体验的效率和互动性,但这种技术系统也可能导致与学生的注意力和其他认知和元认知能力相关的不可预测的后果。本文还通过质疑当前数字人工制品的伦理性质,与当代技术哲学的当前讨论有着深刻的关系。根据许多当代科技哲学,计算机、人工智能系统和智能手机等数字人工制品在道德上并非中立。相反,这些数字技术正在积极地改变我们的道德行为,更广泛地改变我们的责任和道德导航。正如我将在本文中展示的那样,来自智能教育领域的数字技术并不是一种排斥。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Contribution of Institute of Philosophy of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine Towards the Development of Philosophy and Religious Studies in the National University of “Kyiv-Mohyla Academy” Hryhorii Skovoroda and Western European Philosophy: Between the Banks of Mysticism and Rationalism Ideas I: Transcendental Turn in Phenomenological Philosophy Philosophical Dimension of Today’s Educational Technologies: Framing Ethical Landscape of the Smart Education Domain Knowledge as Image in the Late Philosophy of Johann Gottlieb Fichte
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1