Civic Participation in Russia Today: Interaction of Social and Political Practices

V. Petukhov
{"title":"Civic Participation in Russia Today: Interaction of Social and Political Practices","authors":"V. Petukhov","doi":"10.31857/s013216250007743-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The author argues that the rise of civic activism and formation of the public demand for social change convert the problem of the prospects of the Russia’s democracy into another context, than it had been a few years ago. The change of vector of public moods and expectations as it is stated in the article coincides with the emergence of multiple social groups and strata that do not need any goverment care and are interested to expand the borders of freedom and individual selfrealization. These both factors open a «window of opportunity» for the development of diverse forms and practices of «civic participation». The author interprets the above concept as a way that citizens and either formalized or not formalized social associations are expressing self-manifestation in different social spheres. The problem of interaction and co-influence between such two key components of civic participation as the «political» and «social» ones is the central problem of the article. The author argues that the convergence between the «political» and «social» components of civic participation should occur (and to some extent it is already going on) through both the «politicization» of socially oriented public associations and the «socialization» of political parties and movements. The author applies sociological data collected by Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of Russian Academy of Sciences that demonstrate that the level of direct involvement of Russia’s citizens into various forms of political and social participation is low. Wherein there is a rather significant segment of the «activist periphery» that under certain circumstances is promising for more intense involvement. It is emphasized that the increased importance of civic participation in contemporary Russia is determined not so much by its «mass character» as by ability of the active part of society to form institutional matrix of new forms and practices for political representation and public participation. This process is intensifying under the influence of confidence crisis both to existing power and government system and to most institutions of representative democracy.","PeriodicalId":85741,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of sociological studies","volume":"118 1","pages":"3-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of sociological studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31857/s013216250007743-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The author argues that the rise of civic activism and formation of the public demand for social change convert the problem of the prospects of the Russia’s democracy into another context, than it had been a few years ago. The change of vector of public moods and expectations as it is stated in the article coincides with the emergence of multiple social groups and strata that do not need any goverment care and are interested to expand the borders of freedom and individual selfrealization. These both factors open a «window of opportunity» for the development of diverse forms and practices of «civic participation». The author interprets the above concept as a way that citizens and either formalized or not formalized social associations are expressing self-manifestation in different social spheres. The problem of interaction and co-influence between such two key components of civic participation as the «political» and «social» ones is the central problem of the article. The author argues that the convergence between the «political» and «social» components of civic participation should occur (and to some extent it is already going on) through both the «politicization» of socially oriented public associations and the «socialization» of political parties and movements. The author applies sociological data collected by Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of Russian Academy of Sciences that demonstrate that the level of direct involvement of Russia’s citizens into various forms of political and social participation is low. Wherein there is a rather significant segment of the «activist periphery» that under certain circumstances is promising for more intense involvement. It is emphasized that the increased importance of civic participation in contemporary Russia is determined not so much by its «mass character» as by ability of the active part of society to form institutional matrix of new forms and practices for political representation and public participation. This process is intensifying under the influence of confidence crisis both to existing power and government system and to most institutions of representative democracy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
今日俄罗斯的公民参与:社会与政治实践的互动
作者认为,与几年前相比,公民行动主义的兴起和公众对社会变革需求的形成,将俄罗斯民主前景的问题转变为另一种背景。正如文章所述,公众情绪和期望向量的变化与多个社会群体和阶层的出现不谋而合,这些群体和阶层不需要任何政府的照顾,并有兴趣扩大自由和个人自我实现的边界。这两个因素为“公民参与”的各种形式和实践的发展打开了“机会之窗”。笔者将上述概念解读为公民和正规化或非正规化的社会团体在不同社会领域表达自我的一种方式。公民参与的“政治”和“社会”这两个关键组成部分之间的相互作用和共同影响问题是本文的中心问题。作者认为,公民参与的“政治”和“社会”组成部分之间的融合应该通过面向社会的公共协会的“政治化”和政党和运动的“社会化”来实现(并且在某种程度上已经在进行)。作者运用俄罗斯科学院理论和应用社会学联邦中心收集的社会学数据,证明俄罗斯公民直接参与各种形式的政治和社会参与的水平很低。其中有相当重要的一部分“外围激进分子”,在某些情况下有望更强烈地参与。本文强调,当代俄罗斯公民参与的重要性日益增加,与其说是由其“群体性”决定的,不如说是由社会活跃部分形成政治代表和公众参与的新形式和实践的制度矩阵的能力决定的。在现有权力和政府体制以及大多数代议制民主机构的信任危机的影响下,这一进程正在加剧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Оккультизм в сознании горожан Казахстана Опыт перехода российских компаний на удалённую работу в ситуации пандемии The Elderly and Physical Activity: A Qualitative Method The Strong Program in Cultural Sociology: Balancing between Culturalism and Scientism Sociology and Military Studies: Broadening the Perspective, Using the Classics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1