In Vitro Qualitative Assessment of Tolerance to Simulated Gastric Juice, Bile, Fructose, Glucose and Lactose for Different Probiotic Bacteria

Maria Cătălina MATEI LAȚIU, V. Buza, F. Chirilǎ, Z. Boros, C. Lațiu, A. Szakacs, L. Ștefănuț
{"title":"In Vitro Qualitative Assessment of Tolerance to Simulated Gastric Juice, Bile, Fructose, Glucose and Lactose for Different Probiotic Bacteria","authors":"Maria Cătălina MATEI LAȚIU, V. Buza, F. Chirilǎ, Z. Boros, C. Lațiu, A. Szakacs, L. Ștefănuț","doi":"10.15835/buasvmcn-vm:2021.0022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Probiotics are live microorganisms that confer a health benefit to the host when administered in adequate amounts, with the main site of action at the intestinal level. In order to have a maximal effect, probiotic bacteria have to prove a high tolerance for the conditions present in the upper gastro-intestinal tract. The aim of the present study was to assess, from a qualitative point of view, the tolerance of different probiotic bacterial strains and combinations to simulated gastric juice, bile, fructose, lactose and glucose. Also, the influence of food on the bacterial growth after artificial digestion was analyzed. A bacteriologic assessment was realized for three different commercial probiotic products (Bacillus subtilis + Bacillus licheniformis + Pediococcus acidilactici; Enterococcus faecium; Bacillus subtilis + B. licheniformis + B.coagulans + B.indicus + B. clausii), simulating different conditions (artificial digestion method in the absence/presence of food, presence of bile, fructose, glucose, lactose). The obtained results suggested that the tolerance to simulated gastric juice is higher if the food is present in the moment of digestion, regardless of the probiotic bacterial strain or combination. Also, the tolerance to bile was different from one combination to another. The influence of fructose, lactose and glucose are not remarkable from a qualitative point of view. Moreover, the growth of different probiotic bacterial strains is influenced by the simulated gastro-intestinal conditions, sporulated bacteria presenting a slightly higher tolerance compared with non-sporulated strains.","PeriodicalId":9470,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca. Veterinary Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca. Veterinary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15835/buasvmcn-vm:2021.0022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Probiotics are live microorganisms that confer a health benefit to the host when administered in adequate amounts, with the main site of action at the intestinal level. In order to have a maximal effect, probiotic bacteria have to prove a high tolerance for the conditions present in the upper gastro-intestinal tract. The aim of the present study was to assess, from a qualitative point of view, the tolerance of different probiotic bacterial strains and combinations to simulated gastric juice, bile, fructose, lactose and glucose. Also, the influence of food on the bacterial growth after artificial digestion was analyzed. A bacteriologic assessment was realized for three different commercial probiotic products (Bacillus subtilis + Bacillus licheniformis + Pediococcus acidilactici; Enterococcus faecium; Bacillus subtilis + B. licheniformis + B.coagulans + B.indicus + B. clausii), simulating different conditions (artificial digestion method in the absence/presence of food, presence of bile, fructose, glucose, lactose). The obtained results suggested that the tolerance to simulated gastric juice is higher if the food is present in the moment of digestion, regardless of the probiotic bacterial strain or combination. Also, the tolerance to bile was different from one combination to another. The influence of fructose, lactose and glucose are not remarkable from a qualitative point of view. Moreover, the growth of different probiotic bacterial strains is influenced by the simulated gastro-intestinal conditions, sporulated bacteria presenting a slightly higher tolerance compared with non-sporulated strains.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同益生菌对模拟胃液、胆汁、果糖、葡萄糖和乳糖耐受性的体外定性评价
益生菌是一种活的微生物,当给药量足够时,对宿主的健康有益,主要作用部位在肠道水平。为了产生最大的效果,益生菌必须证明对上消化道存在的条件具有很高的耐受性。本研究的目的是从定性的角度评估不同益生菌菌株和组合对模拟胃液、胆汁、果糖、乳糖和葡萄糖的耐受性。并分析了人工消化后食物对细菌生长的影响。对三种不同的商业益生菌产品(枯草芽孢杆菌+地衣芽孢杆菌+酸活性Pediococcus;肠球菌都有效;枯草芽孢杆菌+地衣芽孢杆菌+凝固芽孢杆菌+ indicus芽孢杆菌+ clusii芽孢杆菌),模拟不同的条件(人工消化法在没有/存在食物,存在胆汁,果糖,葡萄糖,乳糖的情况下)。所得结果表明,无论益生菌菌株或组合如何,如果食物在消化时存在,则对模拟胃液的耐受性更高。此外,对胆汁的耐受性也不同于另一种组合。从定性的角度来看,果糖、乳糖和葡萄糖的影响并不显著。此外,不同益生菌菌株的生长受到模拟胃肠道条件的影响,有孢子菌的耐受性略高于无孢子菌。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Risk Assessment Regarding the Contamination of Poultry Meat with Salmonella in a High-Capacity Slaughterhouse Bactericidal Capacity of Serum and Enhancement of Specific Cell-Mediated Immunity Subsequent to Hipopphae Rhamnoides Treatment in Pigs Body Characteristics, Performances and Protein Metabolism in Hy-Line Brown Hens Subject of Natural Moult Effectiveness of the Ovarian Scraping Method in In Vitro Maturation of Equine Oocytes During the Breeding and Non-Breeding Seasons Histochemical Evaluation of Mucin-Secreting Cell Activity in the Stomach of the Wistar Rat
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1