Do women have lower levels of financial literacy, or are they opting out?

Tracey West, Laura de Zwaan, Dianna Johnson
{"title":"Do women have lower levels of financial literacy, or are they opting out?","authors":"Tracey West, Laura de Zwaan, Dianna Johnson","doi":"10.61190/fsr.v31i1.3195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \nMen consistently appear to outperform women on standard financial literacy tests. However, could the results be because of inherent gender bias in measurement tools? This study investigates the reasons for women selecting the non-response option in financial literacy questions, including numerical self-efficacy, risk aversion, and confidence. Our analysis finds evidence that women an- swer more questions than men utilizing the non-response option. A sustained lack of confidence with financial information is the primary reason. These results are important for shaping policy and providing resources that close the gap in measurement and ability. \n \n \n","PeriodicalId":100530,"journal":{"name":"Financial Services Review","volume":"78 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Financial Services Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61190/fsr.v31i1.3195","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Men consistently appear to outperform women on standard financial literacy tests. However, could the results be because of inherent gender bias in measurement tools? This study investigates the reasons for women selecting the non-response option in financial literacy questions, including numerical self-efficacy, risk aversion, and confidence. Our analysis finds evidence that women an- swer more questions than men utilizing the non-response option. A sustained lack of confidence with financial information is the primary reason. These results are important for shaping policy and providing resources that close the gap in measurement and ability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
是女性的金融知识水平较低,还是她们选择不了解?
在标准的金融知识测试中,男性的表现一直优于女性。然而,这些结果可能是因为测量工具固有的性别偏见吗?本研究探讨了女性在金融素养问题中选择不回答选项的原因,包括数字自我效能、风险厌恶和信心。我们的分析发现,使用不回答选项时,女性比男性回答更多的问题。对财务信息持续缺乏信心是主要原因。这些结果对于制定政策和提供资源以缩小衡量和能力方面的差距具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Portfolio insurance using leveraged ETFs Which measures predict risk taking in a multi-stage controlled investment decision process? Life insurance as a retirement income tool Does the source of money determine retirement investment choices? Does financial risk tolerance change over time?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1