Short-term effects of differential learning and contextual interference in a goalkeeper-like task: Visuomotor response time and motor control

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES European Journal of Sport Science Pub Date : 2019-11-22 DOI:10.1080/17461391.2019.1696894
B. Serrien, B. Tassignon, J. Verschueren, R. Meeusen, J. Baeyens
{"title":"Short-term effects of differential learning and contextual interference in a goalkeeper-like task: Visuomotor response time and motor control","authors":"B. Serrien, B. Tassignon, J. Verschueren, R. Meeusen, J. Baeyens","doi":"10.1080/17461391.2019.1696894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this experiment, we compared changes in visuomotor performance and motor control after a single session of differential learning (DL) and contextual interference (CI) in a reaching task to mimic goalkeeping. Subjects (nDL = nCI = 16) stood in front of a wall with six LED-light targets that flashed on in a random order and subjects had to move their hand in front of it as fast as possible in order to extinguish the target. After the pre-test subjects followed a DL or CI training session, followed immediately by a post-test, followed by one hour of rest and a retention test. Performance and motor control were measured respectively by visuomotor response time (VMRT) and an Index of Motor Abundance (IMA; reflecting the strength of movement synergies) calculated with Uncontrolled Manifold analysis. A mixed-effects Bayesian ANOVA model was used to evaluate differences in changes in both parameters between both training groups. Averaged over the six targets, the decrease in VMRT was stronger for DL than CI at the post-test (interference effect) but not at retention. The IMA was on average increased at post- and retention test in both groups, indicating stronger synergies between the degrees-of-freedom. While the ANOVA for IMA was not conclusive, the changes were likely not different between both learning methods. Thus, while an interference effect was found for CI but not DL in terms of performance on the task, no such effect was observed on the behavioural level in terms of the strength of movement synergies.","PeriodicalId":12061,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Sport Science","volume":"120 1","pages":"1061 - 1071"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Sport Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2019.1696894","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Abstract In this experiment, we compared changes in visuomotor performance and motor control after a single session of differential learning (DL) and contextual interference (CI) in a reaching task to mimic goalkeeping. Subjects (nDL = nCI = 16) stood in front of a wall with six LED-light targets that flashed on in a random order and subjects had to move their hand in front of it as fast as possible in order to extinguish the target. After the pre-test subjects followed a DL or CI training session, followed immediately by a post-test, followed by one hour of rest and a retention test. Performance and motor control were measured respectively by visuomotor response time (VMRT) and an Index of Motor Abundance (IMA; reflecting the strength of movement synergies) calculated with Uncontrolled Manifold analysis. A mixed-effects Bayesian ANOVA model was used to evaluate differences in changes in both parameters between both training groups. Averaged over the six targets, the decrease in VMRT was stronger for DL than CI at the post-test (interference effect) but not at retention. The IMA was on average increased at post- and retention test in both groups, indicating stronger synergies between the degrees-of-freedom. While the ANOVA for IMA was not conclusive, the changes were likely not different between both learning methods. Thus, while an interference effect was found for CI but not DL in terms of performance on the task, no such effect was observed on the behavioural level in terms of the strength of movement synergies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在守门员类任务中差异学习和情境干扰的短期影响:视觉运动反应时间和运动控制
在本实验中,我们比较了单次差分学习(DL)和上下文干扰(CI)后在模拟守门员的伸手任务中视觉运动表现和运动控制的变化。受试者(nDL = nCI = 16)站在一堵墙上,墙上有6个随机闪烁的led灯目标,受试者必须在目标前尽可能快地移动他们的手,以熄灭目标。在测试前,受试者进行DL或CI训练,紧接着进行后测,然后休息一小时,再进行记忆力测试。分别用视觉运动反应时间(VMRT)和运动丰度指数(IMA;反映运动协同作用的强度)计算与非控制流形分析。使用混合效应贝叶斯方差分析模型来评估两个训练组之间这两个参数变化的差异。在六个目标的平均水平上,深度学习的VMRT下降在测试后(干扰效应)强于连续记忆,但在记忆保留方面则没有。在两组中,IMA在事后和保留测试中平均增加,表明自由度之间有更强的协同作用。虽然IMA的方差分析不是决定性的,但两种学习方法之间的变化可能没有区别。因此,虽然在任务表现方面发现了CI而不是DL的干扰效应,但在运动协同作用强度方面的行为水平上没有观察到这种影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Sport Science
European Journal of Sport Science 医学-运动科学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
3.10%
发文量
153
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Sport Science (EJSS) is the official Medline- and Thomson Reuters-listed journal of the European College of Sport Science. The editorial policy of the Journal pursues the multi-disciplinary aims of the College: to promote the highest standards of scientific study and scholarship in respect of the following fields: (a) Applied Sport Sciences; (b) Biomechanics and Motor Control; c) Physiology and Nutrition; (d) Psychology, Social Sciences and Humanities and (e) Sports and Exercise Medicine and Health.
期刊最新文献
Consecutive non-training days over a weekend for assessing cardiac parasympathetic variation in response to accumulated exercise stress Exercise intensity regulates the effect of heat stress on substrate oxidation rates during exercise Marathon pacing ability: Training characteristics and previous experience Zumba dancing and aerobic exercise can improve working memory, motor function, and depressive symptoms in female patients with Fibromyalgia Force-velocity profile changes with forearm wearable resistance during standing start sprinting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1