Narrating the past on fairer terms: approaches to building multicultural public memory

IF 1.1 2区 文学 Q3 COMMUNICATION Critical Studies in Media Communication Pub Date : 2022-03-16 DOI:10.1080/15295036.2022.2049616
Jasmine T. Austin, Jill A. Edy
{"title":"Narrating the past on fairer terms: approaches to building multicultural public memory","authors":"Jasmine T. Austin, Jill A. Edy","doi":"10.1080/15295036.2022.2049616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Public memory serves as a foundation for national identity, so struggles to balance respect for difference with the need for common ground emerge repeatedly in struggles over how to remember the public past. Cultural pluralism and multiculturalism tend to articulate a politics of difference in which inequities are identified but common ground proves elusive. Yet, documentaries by African American filmmakers commemorating the 25th anniversary of the 1992 Los Angeles riots suggest ways of narrating the public past on fairer terms that accept difference while recognizing mutuality. Produced by the dominant white culture, LA92 uses an omniscient perspective and simple characterizations to label and denounce incompetence and villainy, suggesting a form of cultural pluralism in which identity groups live side by side, barely tolerating their inherent differences. In contrast, LA Burning and Let It Fall, films grounded in African American cultural traditions of intersectionality and double consciousness, address the tensions of cultural pluralism by integrating diverse perspectives without marginalizing any of them. Rather than distinguishing good from bad people, they distinguish just from unjust social relationships, establishing the possibility of multicultural public memory.","PeriodicalId":47123,"journal":{"name":"Critical Studies in Media Communication","volume":"151 1","pages":"276 - 290"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Studies in Media Communication","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15295036.2022.2049616","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT Public memory serves as a foundation for national identity, so struggles to balance respect for difference with the need for common ground emerge repeatedly in struggles over how to remember the public past. Cultural pluralism and multiculturalism tend to articulate a politics of difference in which inequities are identified but common ground proves elusive. Yet, documentaries by African American filmmakers commemorating the 25th anniversary of the 1992 Los Angeles riots suggest ways of narrating the public past on fairer terms that accept difference while recognizing mutuality. Produced by the dominant white culture, LA92 uses an omniscient perspective and simple characterizations to label and denounce incompetence and villainy, suggesting a form of cultural pluralism in which identity groups live side by side, barely tolerating their inherent differences. In contrast, LA Burning and Let It Fall, films grounded in African American cultural traditions of intersectionality and double consciousness, address the tensions of cultural pluralism by integrating diverse perspectives without marginalizing any of them. Rather than distinguishing good from bad people, they distinguish just from unjust social relationships, establishing the possibility of multicultural public memory.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以更公平的方式叙述过去:构建多元文化公共记忆的方法
公共记忆是国家认同的基础,因此,在如何记住公共过去的斗争中,如何平衡尊重差异与需要共同点的斗争反复出现。文化多元主义和多元文化主义倾向于阐明一种差异政治,在这种政治中,不平等是确定的,但共同点是难以捉摸的。然而,非裔美国电影人为纪念1992年洛杉矶骚乱25周年而拍摄的纪录片,提出了以更公平的方式讲述公共历史的方法,既接受差异,又承认相互性。LA92由主流白人文化产生,用无所不知的视角和简单的特征来标记和谴责无能和邪恶,暗示了一种文化多元主义的形式,在这种文化多元主义中,身份群体并肩生活,几乎不能容忍他们内在的差异。相比之下,《洛杉矶燃烧》和《让它坠落》是基于非裔美国人交叉性和双重意识的文化传统的电影,通过整合不同的观点而不边缘化任何一种观点,解决了文化多元化的紧张局势。他们不是区分好人和坏人,而是区分公正和不公正的社会关系,从而建立多元文化公共记忆的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Critical Studies in Media Communication (CSMC) is a peer-reviewed publication of the National Communication Association. CSMC publishes original scholarship in mediated and mass communication from a cultural studies and/or critical perspective. It particularly welcomes submissions that enrich debates among various critical traditions, methodological and analytical approaches, and theoretical standpoints. CSMC takes an inclusive view of media and welcomes scholarship on topics such as • media audiences • representations • institutions • digital technologies • social media • gaming • professional practices and ethics • production studies • media history • political economy. CSMC publishes scholarship about media audiences, representations, institutions, technologies, and professional practices. It includes work in history, political economy, critical philosophy, race and feminist theorizing, rhetorical and media criticism, and literary theory. It takes an inclusive view of media, including newspapers, magazines and other forms of print, cable, radio, television, film, and new media technologies such as the Internet.
期刊最新文献
Gays Against Groomers and the politics of digital ventriloquism Dialectics of cinematic co-production: ambivalent Korean fantasy romance in Ultimate Oppa Superman, superwoman, or superhero? A thematic analysis of Reddit user discussions of female superheroes “De eso no se habla”: the complexities of representation in Love, Victor “Get Woke, Go Broke”: sport media’s monetization of white male grievance in the age of Trump
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1