Music and Images in New Babylon between Literature and Visual Arts

IF 0.5 0 FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION Music Sound and the Moving Image Pub Date : 2021-03-05 DOI:10.5406/MUSIMOVIIMAG.14.1.0003
Seminara
{"title":"Music and Images in New Babylon between Literature and Visual Arts","authors":"Seminara","doi":"10.5406/MUSIMOVIIMAG.14.1.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article discusses New Babylon (Novyi Vavilon), a silent film in eight parts by Grigory Kozintsev and Leonid Trauberg with music by Dmitri Shostakovich, produced in 1929 by Sovkino, the state film studio of the USSR. It reconstructs the genesis of New Babylon in the context of the artistic avant-garde of the Soviet Union in the 1920s and engages with the recent debate on the different versions of the film, siding with those who believe that the “official” version of New Babylon was the result of a conscious re-editing of the movie.To support this position, the author proposes a structural and aesthetic analysis of New Babylon that focuses on the literary and visual sources of the film and their relationship to sound. Shostakovich found compositional solutions that matched the choices of the directors perfectly, both in terms of musical quotes (corresponding to figurative references) and techniques. On the one hand, the composer employed strategies and topoi of the European musical tradition (such as the so-called figure of death), and on the other hand, he applied to his music the humour and grotesque style typical of literary works by the likes of Dostoevsky, Chekhov, and Gogol. The influence of Russian formalism on the filmic and musical language of New Babylon is also considered in some depth, especially in light of the formalistic concept of “estrangement.” The film is then compared with Eisenstein’s Battleship Potemkin, which helps to explain the original interplay between the arduous musical language and the complex configuration of the images. Finally, the formalistic approach of the authors of New Babylon—Kozinčev, Trauberg, and Shostakovich—is further analyzed by examining two sequences that exemplify the metatextual conception of the film, intended as a “symbolic form” that both generates processes of referring and requires an exegetical commitment.","PeriodicalId":41714,"journal":{"name":"Music Sound and the Moving Image","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Music Sound and the Moving Image","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5406/MUSIMOVIIMAG.14.1.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:This article discusses New Babylon (Novyi Vavilon), a silent film in eight parts by Grigory Kozintsev and Leonid Trauberg with music by Dmitri Shostakovich, produced in 1929 by Sovkino, the state film studio of the USSR. It reconstructs the genesis of New Babylon in the context of the artistic avant-garde of the Soviet Union in the 1920s and engages with the recent debate on the different versions of the film, siding with those who believe that the “official” version of New Babylon was the result of a conscious re-editing of the movie.To support this position, the author proposes a structural and aesthetic analysis of New Babylon that focuses on the literary and visual sources of the film and their relationship to sound. Shostakovich found compositional solutions that matched the choices of the directors perfectly, both in terms of musical quotes (corresponding to figurative references) and techniques. On the one hand, the composer employed strategies and topoi of the European musical tradition (such as the so-called figure of death), and on the other hand, he applied to his music the humour and grotesque style typical of literary works by the likes of Dostoevsky, Chekhov, and Gogol. The influence of Russian formalism on the filmic and musical language of New Babylon is also considered in some depth, especially in light of the formalistic concept of “estrangement.” The film is then compared with Eisenstein’s Battleship Potemkin, which helps to explain the original interplay between the arduous musical language and the complex configuration of the images. Finally, the formalistic approach of the authors of New Babylon—Kozinčev, Trauberg, and Shostakovich—is further analyzed by examining two sequences that exemplify the metatextual conception of the film, intended as a “symbolic form” that both generates processes of referring and requires an exegetical commitment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
文学与视觉艺术之间的新巴比伦音乐与影像
摘要:本文讨论了苏联国家电影制片厂索夫基诺于1929年制作的由格里戈里·科津采夫和列昂尼德·特劳伯格导演、德米特里·肖斯塔科维奇配乐的无声电影《新巴比伦》(Novyi Vavilon)。它在20世纪20年代苏联艺术先锋派的背景下重建了《新巴比伦》的起源,并参与了最近关于电影不同版本的争论,支持那些认为《新巴比伦》的“官方”版本是有意识地重新编辑电影的结果的人。为了支持这一观点,作者提出了对《新巴比伦》的结构和美学分析,重点关注电影的文学和视觉来源以及它们与声音的关系。肖斯塔科维奇找到了与导演的选择完美匹配的作曲解决方案,无论是在音乐引用(对应于比喻引用)还是技术上。一方面,作曲家采用了欧洲音乐传统的策略和主题(如所谓的死亡人物),另一方面,他将陀思妥耶夫斯基、契诃夫和果戈里等人的文学作品中典型的幽默和怪诞风格应用到他的音乐中。俄罗斯形式主义对《新巴比伦》电影和音乐语言的影响也有一定的深度,特别是考虑到形式主义的“隔阂”概念。然后将这部电影与爱森斯坦的《战舰波将金号》进行比较,这有助于解释艰苦的音乐语言和复杂的图像配置之间的原始相互作用。最后,对《新巴比伦》的作者——kozin耶夫、特劳伯格和肖斯塔科维奇——的形式主义方法进行了进一步分析,通过考察两个片段来举例说明电影的元文本概念,作为一种“象征形式”,既产生了参考的过程,又需要一种训诂的承诺。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Music Sound and the Moving Image
Music Sound and the Moving Image FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
期刊最新文献
Introduction: Listening to/with Game Worlds Playing with Fire (and Other Natural Disasters): The Sounds of Climate Change in Sid Meier's Civilization VI: Gathering Storm About the Authors So You're Going on a “Short” Hike? Sensory Awareness and Listening to Ecoregions in A Short Hike Playing the “Fantastical Gap”: Embedded Soundscapes in Video Games
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1