Information Behavior towards False Information and "Fake News" on Facebook: The Influence of Gender, User Type and Trust in Social Media

Thomas Schmidt, Elisabeth Salomon, David Elsweiler, Christian Wolff
{"title":"Information Behavior towards False Information and \"Fake News\" on Facebook: The Influence of Gender, User Type and Trust in Social Media","authors":"Thomas Schmidt, Elisabeth Salomon, David Elsweiler, Christian Wolff","doi":"10.5283/epub.44942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we present a survey study with 119 participants conducted in German, which investigates respondents’ Facebook behavior. In particular, the survey provides insight into how the individual factors gender, user type and trust in social media influence information behavior with respect to false information on Facebook. Our participants’ Facebook use is predominantly passive, the trust in social media is mediocre and most users claim to encounter false information on a weekly basis. If the truthfulness of information is verified it is mostly done by checking alternative sources and for the most part, users do not react actively to false information on Facebook. Of the different categories of Facebook users studied, more active and intensive users of Facebook (posters and heavy users) encounter false information the most. These users are the only user group to report posts with false information to Facebook or interact with the post. Participants with higher trust in social media tend to check the comments of a post to verify information.","PeriodicalId":90875,"journal":{"name":"ISI ... : ... IEEE Intelligence and Security Informatics. IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics","volume":"42 10 1","pages":"125-154"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISI ... : ... IEEE Intelligence and Security Informatics. IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5283/epub.44942","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In this paper, we present a survey study with 119 participants conducted in German, which investigates respondents’ Facebook behavior. In particular, the survey provides insight into how the individual factors gender, user type and trust in social media influence information behavior with respect to false information on Facebook. Our participants’ Facebook use is predominantly passive, the trust in social media is mediocre and most users claim to encounter false information on a weekly basis. If the truthfulness of information is verified it is mostly done by checking alternative sources and for the most part, users do not react actively to false information on Facebook. Of the different categories of Facebook users studied, more active and intensive users of Facebook (posters and heavy users) encounter false information the most. These users are the only user group to report posts with false information to Facebook or interact with the post. Participants with higher trust in social media tend to check the comments of a post to verify information.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Facebook上对虚假信息和“假新闻”的信息行为:性别、用户类型和社交媒体信任的影响
在本文中,我们提出了一项调查研究,119名参与者在德国进行,调查受访者的Facebook行为。特别是,该调查深入了解了个人因素性别、用户类型和对社交媒体的信任如何影响Facebook上虚假信息的信息行为。我们的参与者对Facebook的使用主要是被动的,对社交媒体的信任一般,大多数用户声称每周都会遇到虚假信息。如果信息的真实性得到验证,那主要是通过检查其他来源来完成的,而且在大多数情况下,用户不会对Facebook上的虚假信息做出积极反应。在研究的不同类别的Facebook用户中,更活跃和密集的Facebook用户(发帖者和重度用户)遇到的虚假信息最多。这些用户是唯一向Facebook举报含有虚假信息的帖子或与帖子互动的用户组。对社交媒体信任度较高的参与者倾向于查看帖子的评论来验证信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Open Practices of Early Career Researchers: A Qualitative Study on Research and Teaching Behavior Design and Development of an Emoji Sentiment Lexicon Does the General Public Share Research on Twitter? A Case Study on the Online Conversation about the Search for a Nuclear Repository in Germany Vom Datenkatalog zum Wissensgraph - Forschungsdaten im konzeptuellen Modell von FRBR Omission of Information: Identifying Political Slant via an Analysis of Co-occurring Entities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1