Prescribing Pattern and DrugâÂÂDrug Interactions of Analgesics Prescribed For Pain Management in a Pakistani Tertiary Hospital

Khan Sa, R. Afridi, Afridi Uk, S. Sadozai
{"title":"Prescribing Pattern and DrugâÂÂDrug Interactions of Analgesics Prescribed For Pain Management in a Pakistani Tertiary Hospital","authors":"Khan Sa, R. Afridi, Afridi Uk, S. Sadozai","doi":"10.21065/1920-4159.1000230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The main strategy of analgesic therapy is to diminish the intensity of pain to bearable level. Guidelines have been established by WHO to reduce the possible medication error in analgesic therapy. However, in most of the hospitals in Pakistan, analgesics are not prescribed rationally in accordance with standard guidelines. Objectives: The purpose of this study is to analyze therapeutic strategy of pain management in patients hospitalized at a tertiary hospital, as an exemplary assessment of prescribing pattern of analgesics, and to estimate the prevalence of potential drug–drug interaction there in. Methodology: This is a non-interventional cross sectional study of patients hospitalized in surgical and oncology wards of an urban Pakistani tertiary care hospital. The prescriptions were analyzed for physicians' preferences for the choice of analgesics and number of analgesics prescribed. Moreover, general observation was made whether pain intensity assessment tools were employed before prescribing analgesics. The effectiveness of prescribed analgesics was assessed by interviewing the patients post analgesic therapy. Furthermore, potential drug–drug interactions were also studied using reference books and Medscape Multi Drug interaction checker. Results: In the study population of n=45 inpatient (24 male and 21 female). Tramadol was the most frequently prescribed analgesic. In none of the case pain intensity was assessed before prescribing analgesics, hence, 53.3% subjects complained about severe pain even after analgesic therapy. Potential drug–drug interactions were present in all the prescriptions. Ultimately, 276 interactions were found in 45 prescriptions, among which 60% were of major severity. Conclusion: In current study, poor management of pain was identified in a tertiary hospital in Pakistan. The analgesics were prescribed without actually assessing the pain intensity. Improper analgesic regimen was selected and too many interacting drugs were prescribed simultaneously.","PeriodicalId":15238,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Pharmacy","volume":"378 1","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21065/1920-4159.1000230","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: The main strategy of analgesic therapy is to diminish the intensity of pain to bearable level. Guidelines have been established by WHO to reduce the possible medication error in analgesic therapy. However, in most of the hospitals in Pakistan, analgesics are not prescribed rationally in accordance with standard guidelines. Objectives: The purpose of this study is to analyze therapeutic strategy of pain management in patients hospitalized at a tertiary hospital, as an exemplary assessment of prescribing pattern of analgesics, and to estimate the prevalence of potential drug–drug interaction there in. Methodology: This is a non-interventional cross sectional study of patients hospitalized in surgical and oncology wards of an urban Pakistani tertiary care hospital. The prescriptions were analyzed for physicians' preferences for the choice of analgesics and number of analgesics prescribed. Moreover, general observation was made whether pain intensity assessment tools were employed before prescribing analgesics. The effectiveness of prescribed analgesics was assessed by interviewing the patients post analgesic therapy. Furthermore, potential drug–drug interactions were also studied using reference books and Medscape Multi Drug interaction checker. Results: In the study population of n=45 inpatient (24 male and 21 female). Tramadol was the most frequently prescribed analgesic. In none of the case pain intensity was assessed before prescribing analgesics, hence, 53.3% subjects complained about severe pain even after analgesic therapy. Potential drug–drug interactions were present in all the prescriptions. Ultimately, 276 interactions were found in 45 prescriptions, among which 60% were of major severity. Conclusion: In current study, poor management of pain was identified in a tertiary hospital in Pakistan. The analgesics were prescribed without actually assessing the pain intensity. Improper analgesic regimen was selected and too many interacting drugs were prescribed simultaneously.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴基斯坦一家三级医院镇痛药处方模式与DrugâÂÂDrug镇痛药治疗疼痛的相互作用
背景:镇痛治疗的主要策略是将疼痛强度降低到可承受的水平。世卫组织已制定指南,以减少镇痛治疗中可能出现的用药错误。然而,在巴基斯坦的大多数医院中,镇痛剂并没有按照标准准则合理处方。目的:本研究的目的是分析三级医院住院患者的疼痛治疗策略,作为镇痛药处方模式的示范评估,并估计潜在的药物-药物相互作用的患病率。方法:这是一项非介入性横断面研究,研究对象为巴基斯坦城市三级医院外科和肿瘤病房住院患者。分析医生对镇痛药的选择偏好和处方数量。此外,一般观察疼痛强度评估工具是否在处方止痛药之前使用。通过对患者进行镇痛治疗后的访谈来评估处方镇痛药的有效性。此外,还使用参考书和Medscape多药物相互作用检查器研究了潜在的药物-药物相互作用。结果:研究人群中住院患者45例(男24例,女21例)。曲马多是最常用的止痛药。在所有病例中,在开药前均未对疼痛强度进行评估,因此,53.3%的受试者在开药后仍抱怨疼痛严重。所有处方中都存在潜在的药物相互作用。最终,在45张处方中发现276种相互作用,其中60%为严重程度。结论:在目前的研究中,巴基斯坦一家三级医院发现疼痛管理不善。在没有实际评估疼痛强度的情况下开了镇痛药。镇痛方案选择不当,相互作用药物过多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
PHARMACEUTICAL QUALITY AND STABILITY OF FUROSEMIDE TABLETS IN TROPICAL STORAGE CONDITIONS: AN IN-VITRO ANALYSIS CARDIOTOXIC POTENCIALOF PIOGLITAZONE/AZOLE ANTIFUNGALS DRUGS INTERACTION IN RATES REPACKAGED PROPRANOLOL HYDROCHLORIDE TABLETS: PHARMACEUTICAL STABILITY IN TWO DIFFERENT STORAGE CONDITIONS Ms. AQUEOUS AND ETHANOLIC EXTRACTS OF TRACHY SPERMUM AMMI EXHIBIT COMPARABLE ANTIDEPRESSANT AND ANXIOLYTIC EFFECT TO IMIPRAMINE HYDROCHLORIDE AND DIAZEPAM POTENTIAL THREATS OF ORDINARY INVESTIGATION AND LITIGATION MODEL OF THE NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU ON THE PHARMACEUTICAL AND HEALTH SYSTEM IN PAKISTAN.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1