THE CONSTRUCTION AND NEGOTIATION OF AGENTIVE IDENTITY: A CASE STUDY OF A MALAYSIAN STUDENT

IF 0.5 Q3 AREA STUDIES Journal of Nusantara Studies (JONUS) Pub Date : 2023-06-30 DOI:10.24200/jonus.vol8iss2pp375-396
Nadia Tun, Zurina Khairuddin
{"title":"THE CONSTRUCTION AND NEGOTIATION OF AGENTIVE IDENTITY: A CASE STUDY OF A MALAYSIAN STUDENT","authors":"Nadia Tun, Zurina Khairuddin","doi":"10.24200/jonus.vol8iss2pp375-396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Purpose: The success of the government’s aspiration into developing holistic Malaysian students not only lies in what has been going in today’s classroom but also outside classroom in which the fundamental process of seeking for knowledge, skills and competencies. Holistic identity is not a construct that is inherited, nor does it remain constant but is developed and evolves from different academic encounters faced by the students. Thus, the present study investigated the construction and negotiation of a student’s identity from her interaction within academic settings in Malaysian Higher Education Institution (MHEI). \n  \nMethodology: The study employed qualitative research and linguistic ethnography approaches utilising case study as the research design. One (1) Malaysian student from a MHEI was chosen using purposive sampling technique. The data for the study were collected from classroom observations, interview and focus group discussion. The data were analysed using thematic analysis and identity in interaction framework analysis. \n  \nFindings: The participant of this study constructed and negotiated an agentive identity during the process of making conscious decisions in her academic experiences. Agentive identity could be seen emerged from her interactions and indexed from her behaviour and opinion during her academic encounters (inside and outside the classroom). The participant’s engagement behaviour portrayed could be interpreted as being agentive from the lens of the two principles in identity framework analysis namely; the emergence principle and the indexicality principle. \n  \nContributions: Experiencing different educational contexts could help to shape Malaysian students to be balanced, academically and morally, as aspired by the Malaysia National Education Philosophy. Malaysian students are seen as the catalysts who would lead the country in the future. The findings of this study could also be used as a reference on how educational practices reflect on the production of individuals as manifested in the NEP. Examining how students construct and negotiate their identities in a new or/and familiarised academic convention could enlighten the stakeholders such as the students themselves, lecturers, tutors, parents, and ministry to be more flexible, allowing students to be empowered within appropriate contexts. \n  \nKeywords: Malaysian students, students’ identity, higher education, student agency, agentive identity \n  \nCite as: Nadia, T., & Zurina, K. (2023). The construction and negotiation of agentive identity: A case study of a Malaysian student. Journal of Nusantara Studies, 8(2), 373-394. http://dx.doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol8iss2pp373-394","PeriodicalId":16687,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nusantara Studies (JONUS)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nusantara Studies (JONUS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol8iss2pp375-396","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Purpose: The success of the government’s aspiration into developing holistic Malaysian students not only lies in what has been going in today’s classroom but also outside classroom in which the fundamental process of seeking for knowledge, skills and competencies. Holistic identity is not a construct that is inherited, nor does it remain constant but is developed and evolves from different academic encounters faced by the students. Thus, the present study investigated the construction and negotiation of a student’s identity from her interaction within academic settings in Malaysian Higher Education Institution (MHEI).   Methodology: The study employed qualitative research and linguistic ethnography approaches utilising case study as the research design. One (1) Malaysian student from a MHEI was chosen using purposive sampling technique. The data for the study were collected from classroom observations, interview and focus group discussion. The data were analysed using thematic analysis and identity in interaction framework analysis.   Findings: The participant of this study constructed and negotiated an agentive identity during the process of making conscious decisions in her academic experiences. Agentive identity could be seen emerged from her interactions and indexed from her behaviour and opinion during her academic encounters (inside and outside the classroom). The participant’s engagement behaviour portrayed could be interpreted as being agentive from the lens of the two principles in identity framework analysis namely; the emergence principle and the indexicality principle.   Contributions: Experiencing different educational contexts could help to shape Malaysian students to be balanced, academically and morally, as aspired by the Malaysia National Education Philosophy. Malaysian students are seen as the catalysts who would lead the country in the future. The findings of this study could also be used as a reference on how educational practices reflect on the production of individuals as manifested in the NEP. Examining how students construct and negotiate their identities in a new or/and familiarised academic convention could enlighten the stakeholders such as the students themselves, lecturers, tutors, parents, and ministry to be more flexible, allowing students to be empowered within appropriate contexts.   Keywords: Malaysian students, students’ identity, higher education, student agency, agentive identity   Cite as: Nadia, T., & Zurina, K. (2023). The construction and negotiation of agentive identity: A case study of a Malaysian student. Journal of Nusantara Studies, 8(2), 373-394. http://dx.doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol8iss2pp373-394
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
代理身份的建构与协商:一个马来西亚学生的个案研究
背景和目的:政府培养全人马来西亚学生的愿望的成功不仅在于今天课堂上的情况,而且在于课堂外寻求知识,技能和能力的基本过程。整体身份不是一个继承的结构,也不是保持不变,而是从学生面临的不同学术遭遇中发展和演变而来的。因此,本研究调查了马来西亚高等教育机构(MHEI)学术环境中学生身份的建构和协商。研究方法:采用定性研究和语言人种学方法,以个案研究为研究设计。使用有目的的抽样技术,从MHEI中选择了一名马来西亚学生。本研究的数据收集自课堂观察、访谈和焦点小组讨论。使用主题分析和交互框架中的身份分析对数据进行分析。研究结果:本研究的参与者在其学术经历的有意识决策过程中构建和协商代理身份。代理身份可以从她的互动中看到,并从她在学术接触(课堂内外)中的行为和意见中得到索引。从身份框架分析的两个原则来看,参与者的参与行为可以被解释为具有代理性,即;涌现原则和指数性原则。贡献:经历不同的教育背景可以帮助塑造马来西亚学生在学业和道德上的平衡,正如马来西亚国家教育哲学所期望的那样。马来西亚学生被视为未来领导国家的催化剂。这项研究的结果也可以作为教育实践如何反映新经济政策所体现的个人生产的参考。研究学生如何在一个新的或/和熟悉的学术惯例中构建和协商他们的身份,可以启发利益相关者,如学生自己、讲师、导师、家长和事工,使他们更加灵活,让学生在适当的环境中获得权力。关键词:马来西亚学生,学生身份,高等教育,学生代理,代理身份引用为:Nadia, T, & Zurina, K.(2023)。代理认同的建构与协商:以马来西亚学生为例。自然科学学报,8(2),373-394。http://dx.doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol8iss2pp373-394
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
20.00%
发文量
44
期刊最新文献
“GREETINGS FROM HELL (NERAKA KIRIM SALAM)”: A DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF RELIGIOUS-BASED CYBERBULLYING OF DEHIJABIS IMPLEMENTING MONETARY POLICY WITH APPLICATION OF SUKUK: CHALLENGES AND POLICY DIRECTIONS CHALLENGES AND GENDER DIFFERENCES IN IMPLEMENTING GAMIFICATION APPROACH AMONG VOCATIONAL COLLEGE LECTURERS IN MALAYSIA THE CONSTRUCTION AND NEGOTIATION OF AGENTIVE IDENTITY: A CASE STUDY OF A MALAYSIAN STUDENT HEURISTIC ANALYSIS OF THE NATIVE LANGUAGE CURRICULUM OF SUCCESSFUL COUNTRIES IN PISA AND TURKEY BY USING ANFIS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1