Rhetorical questions or rhetorical uses of questions?

Q2 Arts and Humanities ExELL Pub Date : 2016-12-01 DOI:10.1515/EXELL-2017-0009
Džemal Špago
{"title":"Rhetorical questions or rhetorical uses of questions?","authors":"Džemal Špago","doi":"10.1515/EXELL-2017-0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper aims to explore whether some rhetorical questions contain certain linguistic elements or forms which would differentiate them from answer-eliciting and action-eliciting questions, and thereby hint at their rhetorical nature even outside the context. Namely, despite the fact that the same questions can be rhetorical in one context, and answer-eliciting in another, some of them are more likely to be associated with rhetorical or non-rhetorical use. The analysis is based on extensive data (over 1200 examples of rhetorical questions taken from 30 plays by two British and two American writers), and the results are expected to give an insight into whether we can talk about rhetorical questions or just a rhetorical use of questions.","PeriodicalId":37072,"journal":{"name":"ExELL","volume":"136 1","pages":"102 - 115"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ExELL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/EXELL-2017-0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Abstract This paper aims to explore whether some rhetorical questions contain certain linguistic elements or forms which would differentiate them from answer-eliciting and action-eliciting questions, and thereby hint at their rhetorical nature even outside the context. Namely, despite the fact that the same questions can be rhetorical in one context, and answer-eliciting in another, some of them are more likely to be associated with rhetorical or non-rhetorical use. The analysis is based on extensive data (over 1200 examples of rhetorical questions taken from 30 plays by two British and two American writers), and the results are expected to give an insight into whether we can talk about rhetorical questions or just a rhetorical use of questions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
反问句还是反问句的修辞用法?
摘要本文旨在探讨某些反问句是否包含某些语言元素或形式,从而使其区别于引出答案和引出行动的反问句,从而暗示其在语境之外的修辞性质。也就是说,尽管同样的问题在一种语境中可能是修辞性的,而在另一种语境中可能是引出答案的,但其中一些问题更有可能与修辞性或非修辞性的使用有关。该分析基于广泛的数据(取自两位英国作家和两位美国作家的30部戏剧中的1200多个反问句),其结果有望让我们深入了解我们是否可以谈论反问句,或者只是反问句的修辞用法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ExELL
ExELL Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Clause complexing in research-article abstracts: Comparing human- and AI-generated texts Resilience in virtual education: Designing and validating a scale in higher education The power of metaphor in thesis writing process Homogeneity and heterogeneity in lexical stress placement among Ugandan speakers of English as an L2: a view from usage-based perspective Acquisition of English nominal suffix -er by advanced EFL learners: a view from usage-based perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1