Current state and research directions for disposable versus reusable packaging: A systematic literature review of comparative studies

IF 2.8 4区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING Packaging Technology and Science Pub Date : 2023-03-06 DOI:10.1002/pts.2722
Henrik Pålsson, John Olsson
{"title":"Current state and research directions for disposable versus reusable packaging: A systematic literature review of comparative studies","authors":"Henrik Pålsson, John Olsson","doi":"10.1002/pts.2722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of disposable and reusable packaging is a hot topic in policy and practice, but different studies have come to different conclusions on when each packaging type is the more sustainable alternative. The purpose of this paper is to map and review scientific literature that compares disposable and reusable packaging for food, beverages and e‐commerce from a sustainability perspective. The methodology is a systematic literature review, which identifies 91 scientific papers. The paper describes and analyses the origin, characteristics and state of current knowledge and then proposes future research directions within five areas. It identifies and presents what is known in literature to achieve environmental and social sustainability, as well as circularity for disposable compared to reusable packaging. The review shows that the literature is to great extent qualitative, often studying individual products in a specific context. European studies dominate the current literature, and many of them revolve around a few types of products and packaging. Slightly under half of the studies use the life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology. The review of these studies provides some indicative suggestions for when disposable and reusable packaging is environmentally preferable, but the number of LCA studies is too limited, and their content too fragmented to draw general conclusions about this. Overall, the review of 91 articles shows a great need for continued research that compares the environmental efficiency of disposable and reusable packaging. It also highlights the necessity for more knowledge to be able to clearly state under what conditions and in what contexts disposable and reusable packaging are the most sustainable options.","PeriodicalId":19626,"journal":{"name":"Packaging Technology and Science","volume":"31 1","pages":"391 - 409"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Packaging Technology and Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.2722","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The use of disposable and reusable packaging is a hot topic in policy and practice, but different studies have come to different conclusions on when each packaging type is the more sustainable alternative. The purpose of this paper is to map and review scientific literature that compares disposable and reusable packaging for food, beverages and e‐commerce from a sustainability perspective. The methodology is a systematic literature review, which identifies 91 scientific papers. The paper describes and analyses the origin, characteristics and state of current knowledge and then proposes future research directions within five areas. It identifies and presents what is known in literature to achieve environmental and social sustainability, as well as circularity for disposable compared to reusable packaging. The review shows that the literature is to great extent qualitative, often studying individual products in a specific context. European studies dominate the current literature, and many of them revolve around a few types of products and packaging. Slightly under half of the studies use the life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology. The review of these studies provides some indicative suggestions for when disposable and reusable packaging is environmentally preferable, but the number of LCA studies is too limited, and their content too fragmented to draw general conclusions about this. Overall, the review of 91 articles shows a great need for continued research that compares the environmental efficiency of disposable and reusable packaging. It also highlights the necessity for more knowledge to be able to clearly state under what conditions and in what contexts disposable and reusable packaging are the most sustainable options.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一次性包装与可重复使用包装的现状及研究方向:比较研究的系统文献综述
使用一次性和可重复使用的包装是政策和实践中的一个热门话题,但是不同的研究得出了不同的结论,当每种包装类型是更可持续的替代品。本文的目的是从可持续发展的角度对食品、饮料和电子商务的一次性和可重复使用包装进行比较的科学文献进行分析和回顾。方法是系统的文献综述,其中确定了91篇科学论文。本文描述和分析了当前知识的起源、特点和现状,并从五个方面提出了未来的研究方向。它确定并提出了文献中已知的实现环境和社会可持续性的内容,以及与可重复使用包装相比,一次性包装的循环性。回顾表明,文献在很大程度上是定性的,经常在特定的背景下研究单个产品。欧洲的研究主导了当前的文献,其中许多都围绕着几种类型的产品和包装。略低于一半的研究使用了生命周期评估(LCA)方法。对这些研究的审查提供了一些指示性建议,说明什么时候一次性和可重复使用的包装对环境更有利,但LCA研究的数量太有限,内容也太分散,无法就此得出一般性结论。总的来说,对91篇文章的审查表明,非常需要继续研究,比较一次性和可重复使用包装的环境效率。它还强调需要更多的知识,以便能够清楚地说明在什么条件下和在什么情况下,一次性和可重复使用的包装是最可持续的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Packaging Technology and Science
Packaging Technology and Science 工程技术-工程:制造
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
78
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Packaging Technology & Science publishes original research, applications and review papers describing significant, novel developments in its field. The Journal welcomes contributions in a wide range of areas in packaging technology and science, including: -Active packaging -Aseptic and sterile packaging -Barrier packaging -Design methodology -Environmental factors and sustainability -Ergonomics -Food packaging -Machinery and engineering for packaging -Marketing aspects of packaging -Materials -Migration -New manufacturing processes and techniques -Testing, analysis and quality control -Transport packaging
期刊最新文献
Electrospinning in Food Packaging: Current Trend and Future Direction Drivers and Barriers Influencing Consumers' Intention to Purchase Cosmetics With Refillable Packaging Cellulose Extraction From Green Algae, Ulva Ohnoi, and Its Application to PVA-Based Antibacterial Composite Films Incorporated With Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles Pectin From Fruit Peel Waste: A Sustainable Source for Production of Active Packaging Films Effects of Storage Temperatures and Times on Drying Chicken Breasts Using Film-Drying: A New Application of Polymeric Film for Food Preservation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1