How to Improve Accuracy of Existing Ultrasonic Water Meters

I. Gryshanova, I. Korobko
{"title":"How to Improve Accuracy of Existing Ultrasonic Water Meters","authors":"I. Gryshanova, I. Korobko","doi":"10.1115/fedsm2021-63247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In present paper, the focus is given to possible ways of increasing accuracy for existing ultrasonic time-of-flight water meters. We will consider transducers with coaxial reflectors working at laminar, transitional and turbulent regimes within their measurement range. Considering error curves of such meters, we can easily resume that they are non-linear and not simply corrected using only one polynomic function. Measurements in laboratory and field conditions demonstrate that there is a shift in the ultrasonic meter’s calibration factor. The deviation of readings starts at Re = 5 000–10 000 and the maximum value is reached at Re = 160. Great inaccuracies referred to the transition from laminar flow to turbulent take place abruptly, which lead to undesirable errors. To understand this phenomenon, the theoretical basis of ultrasonic measurements was analyzed and revealed that typical algorithm for determination of the calibration factor is very questionable since it contains simplified information about velocity profile distribution. Trying to fix this problem, we applied computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modelling of ultrasonic meters with different variants of flow straighteners. Ranges of applicability of a particular turbulence model for a correct description of the velocity profile and other flow parameters in metrological purposes have been evaluated. Due to applied techniques, the flow profile sensitivities of various meter configurations are investigated at different Reynolds numbers comparing to real experiments. To get an improved ultrasonic meter design recirculation zones and flow separation regions inside the flow transducer have been eliminated. As a result, the accuracy of the ultrasonic water meter has increased. Simulations demonstrated reasonable agreement to the error curves obtained on the calibration facility for a whole measurement range.","PeriodicalId":23636,"journal":{"name":"Volume 2: Fluid Applications and Systems; Fluid Measurement and Instrumentation","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 2: Fluid Applications and Systems; Fluid Measurement and Instrumentation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/fedsm2021-63247","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In present paper, the focus is given to possible ways of increasing accuracy for existing ultrasonic time-of-flight water meters. We will consider transducers with coaxial reflectors working at laminar, transitional and turbulent regimes within their measurement range. Considering error curves of such meters, we can easily resume that they are non-linear and not simply corrected using only one polynomic function. Measurements in laboratory and field conditions demonstrate that there is a shift in the ultrasonic meter’s calibration factor. The deviation of readings starts at Re = 5 000–10 000 and the maximum value is reached at Re = 160. Great inaccuracies referred to the transition from laminar flow to turbulent take place abruptly, which lead to undesirable errors. To understand this phenomenon, the theoretical basis of ultrasonic measurements was analyzed and revealed that typical algorithm for determination of the calibration factor is very questionable since it contains simplified information about velocity profile distribution. Trying to fix this problem, we applied computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modelling of ultrasonic meters with different variants of flow straighteners. Ranges of applicability of a particular turbulence model for a correct description of the velocity profile and other flow parameters in metrological purposes have been evaluated. Due to applied techniques, the flow profile sensitivities of various meter configurations are investigated at different Reynolds numbers comparing to real experiments. To get an improved ultrasonic meter design recirculation zones and flow separation regions inside the flow transducer have been eliminated. As a result, the accuracy of the ultrasonic water meter has increased. Simulations demonstrated reasonable agreement to the error curves obtained on the calibration facility for a whole measurement range.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
如何提高现有超声波水表的精度
本文重点讨论了提高现有超声飞行时间水表精度的可能途径。我们将考虑具有同轴反射器的换能器在其测量范围内在层流,过渡和湍流状态下工作。考虑到这类仪表的误差曲线,我们可以很容易地恢复它们是非线性的,而不是简单地用一个多项式函数来修正。在实验室和现场条件下的测量表明,超声波仪表的校准系数有一个变化。读数偏差在Re = 5 000 - 10 000处开始,在Re = 160处达到最大值。从层流到湍流的转变是突然发生的,这导致了不希望出现的误差。为了理解这一现象,分析了超声测量的理论基础,揭示了典型的确定校准因子的算法由于包含了速度剖面分布的简化信息而存在很大的问题。为了解决这一问题,我们应用计算流体动力学(CFD)对不同流量矫直器的超声波流量计进行建模。在计量目的中,对正确描述速度剖面和其他流动参数的特定湍流模型的适用范围进行了评估。由于应用技术的原因,本文与实际实验对比,研究了不同雷诺数下不同仪表结构的流型灵敏度。为了改进超声波流量计的设计,消除了流量传感器内部的再循环区和流动分离区。从而提高了超声波水表的精度。仿真结果表明,在整个测量范围内,所得到的误差曲线与标定装置上得到的误差曲线具有较好的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fluid Dynamics and Contact Stress on Hard Sealing Surface Analysis of LNG Cryogenic Ball Valve 0D Modeling of Fuel Tank for Vapor Generation Impact of Urban Microclimate on Air Conditioning Energy Consumption Using Different Convective Heat Transfer Coefficient Correlations Available in Building Energy Simulation Tools Study on Overall Design of a Vertical Take-Off and Landing Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Powered by Electric Ducted Fans Influence of the Topological Structures of the Nose of High-Speed Maglev Train on Aerodynamic Performances
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1