Transboundary Dialogue and Cooperation: First Lessons from Igniting Negotiations on Joint Management of the Mayombe Forest in the Congo Basin

T. Ijang, Ndikumagenge Cleto, Ngome Williams Ewane, Agostinho Chicaia, Ron Tamar
{"title":"Transboundary Dialogue and Cooperation: First Lessons from Igniting Negotiations on Joint Management of the Mayombe Forest in the Congo Basin","authors":"T. Ijang, Ndikumagenge Cleto, Ngome Williams Ewane, Agostinho Chicaia, Ron Tamar","doi":"10.5923/J.IJAF.20120203.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper questions the conduct of key processes and outcome of preliminary actions leading to national engagements and commitment for the management of transboundary protected areas and how these fit into the broader picture of multi-stakeholder negotiation and collaboration framework. Using the participatory learning and action method, authors accompanied stakeholders (consultants, facilitators, experts and Ministers from Angola, Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and Congo) in negotiating the Mayombe forest transboundary protected area. Main activities carried out were baseline studies, internal meetings and multiparty meetings organized in the respective countries, Kinshasa (DRC) and Cabinda (Angola). Results show that the negotiation process was initially win-lose during the first multiparty meeting. These worsen to a lose-lose scenario in the second meeting. At this stage the process was rather externally-driven. After serious internal meetings and the intervention of senior officials it finally moved to a win-win situation as a result of increased national ownership. Since the ministers from the three countries were able to reverse the negotiation outcome, it appears that the views of high level government authorities are essential in preliminary arrangements in transboundary dialogue and cooperation. As such, protected areas negotiation schemes should not be limited to technical expertise but rather be inclusive of politics at the national and regional level. It is expected that increased national-level and local-level ownership would further improve the win-win tendencies","PeriodicalId":13804,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Agriculture and Forestry","volume":"12 5 1","pages":"121-131"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Agriculture and Forestry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5923/J.IJAF.20120203.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper questions the conduct of key processes and outcome of preliminary actions leading to national engagements and commitment for the management of transboundary protected areas and how these fit into the broader picture of multi-stakeholder negotiation and collaboration framework. Using the participatory learning and action method, authors accompanied stakeholders (consultants, facilitators, experts and Ministers from Angola, Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and Congo) in negotiating the Mayombe forest transboundary protected area. Main activities carried out were baseline studies, internal meetings and multiparty meetings organized in the respective countries, Kinshasa (DRC) and Cabinda (Angola). Results show that the negotiation process was initially win-lose during the first multiparty meeting. These worsen to a lose-lose scenario in the second meeting. At this stage the process was rather externally-driven. After serious internal meetings and the intervention of senior officials it finally moved to a win-win situation as a result of increased national ownership. Since the ministers from the three countries were able to reverse the negotiation outcome, it appears that the views of high level government authorities are essential in preliminary arrangements in transboundary dialogue and cooperation. As such, protected areas negotiation schemes should not be limited to technical expertise but rather be inclusive of politics at the national and regional level. It is expected that increased national-level and local-level ownership would further improve the win-win tendencies
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
跨界对话与合作:启动刚果盆地Mayombe森林联合管理谈判的初步经验
本文对导致国家参与和承诺管理跨界保护区的初步行动的关键过程和结果,以及这些如何融入多利益相关者谈判和合作框架的更广泛图景提出了质疑。采用参与式学习和行动方法,作者陪同利益攸关方(安哥拉、刚果民主共和国和刚果民主共和国的顾问、协调员、专家和部长)就Mayombe森林跨界保护区进行谈判。开展的主要活动是基线研究、内部会议和在各自国家金沙萨(刚果民主共和国)和卡宾达(安哥拉)组织的多方会议。结果表明,在第一次多方会议中,谈判过程最初是双赢的。在第二次会议上,这些情况恶化成双输的局面。在这个阶段,这个过程是由外部驱动的。经过认真的内部会议和高级官员的干预,由于国家所有权的增加,它最终进入了双赢局面。由于三国部长能够扭转谈判结果,看来高层政府当局的意见在跨界对话与合作的初步安排中是必不可少的。因此,保护区谈判计划不应局限于技术专门知识,而应包括国家和区域一级的政治。预计增加国家和地方一级的所有权将进一步改善双赢趋势
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessing the Environmental Impacts of Farm Subsidy in North Texas Region Exploring Cocoa Farm Land Use in the West African Region Analyzing changing trends in forest land areas of Mississippi. Effect of Temperature and Time Torrefaction on the Energetic Properties of Bracatinga Wood Analysis of Solid Waste Generation in a Wood Processing Machine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1