The future of social science integration in rangelands research

Mark Brunson , Lynn Huntsinger , Gwendŵr Meredith , Nathan Sayre
{"title":"The future of social science integration in rangelands research","authors":"Mark Brunson ,&nbsp;Lynn Huntsinger ,&nbsp;Gwendŵr Meredith ,&nbsp;Nathan Sayre","doi":"10.1016/j.rala.2021.08.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p></p><ul><li><span>•</span><span><p>Researchers have studied human dimensions of rangelands since the earliest days of US rangeland science, usually focusing only on white, male, English-speaking ranch owners.</p></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><p>To address questions of rural prosperity and collaborative management, social scientists and the Long-Term Agroecosystem Research (LTAR) Network must turn their attention to the perspectives, practices, and experiences of indigenous, non-Anglo, female, and “new rural” rangeland stakeholders as well.</p></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><p>Social science researchers can learn from scholars in related fields whose work is less often consulted in rangeland science, including those working internationally with pastoral communities and in the United States with rural youth.</p></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><p>Understanding these communities is likely to require broadening our conceptions of what constitutes “knowledge,” with a greater focus on seeking just outcomes for the full range of people who depend upon rangelands and rangeland communities for their lives and livelihoods.</p></span></li></ul></div>","PeriodicalId":101057,"journal":{"name":"Rangelands","volume":"44 5","pages":"Pages 377-385"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190052821000894/pdfft?md5=6aae9bc445718d3c4c1a556d4a7f41ab&pid=1-s2.0-S0190052821000894-main.pdf","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rangelands","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190052821000894","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

  • Researchers have studied human dimensions of rangelands since the earliest days of US rangeland science, usually focusing only on white, male, English-speaking ranch owners.

  • To address questions of rural prosperity and collaborative management, social scientists and the Long-Term Agroecosystem Research (LTAR) Network must turn their attention to the perspectives, practices, and experiences of indigenous, non-Anglo, female, and “new rural” rangeland stakeholders as well.

  • Social science researchers can learn from scholars in related fields whose work is less often consulted in rangeland science, including those working internationally with pastoral communities and in the United States with rural youth.

  • Understanding these communities is likely to require broadening our conceptions of what constitutes “knowledge,” with a greater focus on seeking just outcomes for the full range of people who depend upon rangelands and rangeland communities for their lives and livelihoods.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
草地研究中社会科学整合的未来
•从美国牧场科学的早期开始,研究人员就开始研究牧场的人类维度,通常只关注白人、男性、说英语的牧场主人。•为了解决农村繁荣和协作管理的问题,社会科学家和长期农业生态系统研究(LTAR)网络必须将他们的注意力转向土著、非盎格鲁人、女性和“新农村”牧场利益相关者的观点、实践和经验。•社会科学研究人员可以向相关领域的学者学习,这些学者的工作很少在牧场科学中得到咨询,包括那些在国际上与牧区社区合作的学者和在美国与农村青年合作的学者。•了解这些社区可能需要拓宽我们对“知识”构成的概念,更加注重为依赖牧场和牧场社区生活和生计的所有人寻求公正的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Rangeland management practices in Somaliland: lessons learned from the Aroori Grazing Reserve Rates of change in invasive annual grass cover to inform management actions in sagebrush ecosystems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1