A. P. Quintero, M. A. Domínguez-Sánchez, K. Bonilla-Vargas, J. Correa-Bautista, G. P. Velasco-Orjuela, A. García-Hermoso, Alejandra Tordecilla-Sanders, R. Ramírez‐Vélez
{"title":"Acute Effect of Three Different Exercise Training Modalities on Executive Function in Overweight Inactive Men: The BrainFit Study","authors":"A. P. Quintero, M. A. Domínguez-Sánchez, K. Bonilla-Vargas, J. Correa-Bautista, G. P. Velasco-Orjuela, A. García-Hermoso, Alejandra Tordecilla-Sanders, R. Ramírez‐Vélez","doi":"10.1249/01.mss.0000535750.40951.c1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is currently a consensus about the positive effects of physical exercise on cognition. However, the exercise intensity-dependent effect on executive function remains unclear. Thus, the aim of this study was to compare the acute effects of high-intensity aerobic interval training (HIIT), resistance training (RT), or combined training (RT+ HIIT) on executive function indicators in overweight inactive men adults (age 18–30 years old). The participants were screened and excluded for medical conditions known to impact cognitive functioning, and that was measured with Moca test screening cognitive. Randomized, parallel-group clinical trial among 36 adults were randomly assigned to a HIIT, RT, RT+HIIT, and a control group (n=10) until the energy expenditure of 400-500 kcal. Cognitive inhibition and attention capacity were examined using Stroop Test and d2 Test of Attention respectively, were obtained pre-exercise for baseline measurement and immediately 1-min post-exercise for each exercise training modalities. Cognitive inhibition measured as Stroop test was improved after HIIT protocol for the reading +5.89(η2=0.33), colors naming +9.0(η2=0.60), interference +10.1 (η2=0.39) and index interference domain +6.0(η2=0.20). Additionally, the RT+HIIT group had an increase +7.1(η2=0.40) for the reading condition, colors naming +7.5(η2=0.80), and interference +5.8(η2=0.39). In regard to attentional capacity, the HIIT group elicit moderate to large improvements the concentration levels domain +21.7(η2=0.44), item processed domain +56.6 (η2=0.50), and % errors -3.0(η2=0.27). These results were similar in RT and RT+HIIT group on concentration levels and item processed domain(P<0.05). In conclusion, acute HIIT and RT+HIIT session reported moderate to large effect sizes than RT alone for cognitive inhibition and attention capacity. Taken together, the results suggest that even short-term exercise interventions can enhance overweight adults’ executive functions.","PeriodicalId":18500,"journal":{"name":"Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise","volume":"329 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0000535750.40951.c1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
There is currently a consensus about the positive effects of physical exercise on cognition. However, the exercise intensity-dependent effect on executive function remains unclear. Thus, the aim of this study was to compare the acute effects of high-intensity aerobic interval training (HIIT), resistance training (RT), or combined training (RT+ HIIT) on executive function indicators in overweight inactive men adults (age 18–30 years old). The participants were screened and excluded for medical conditions known to impact cognitive functioning, and that was measured with Moca test screening cognitive. Randomized, parallel-group clinical trial among 36 adults were randomly assigned to a HIIT, RT, RT+HIIT, and a control group (n=10) until the energy expenditure of 400-500 kcal. Cognitive inhibition and attention capacity were examined using Stroop Test and d2 Test of Attention respectively, were obtained pre-exercise for baseline measurement and immediately 1-min post-exercise for each exercise training modalities. Cognitive inhibition measured as Stroop test was improved after HIIT protocol for the reading +5.89(η2=0.33), colors naming +9.0(η2=0.60), interference +10.1 (η2=0.39) and index interference domain +6.0(η2=0.20). Additionally, the RT+HIIT group had an increase +7.1(η2=0.40) for the reading condition, colors naming +7.5(η2=0.80), and interference +5.8(η2=0.39). In regard to attentional capacity, the HIIT group elicit moderate to large improvements the concentration levels domain +21.7(η2=0.44), item processed domain +56.6 (η2=0.50), and % errors -3.0(η2=0.27). These results were similar in RT and RT+HIIT group on concentration levels and item processed domain(P<0.05). In conclusion, acute HIIT and RT+HIIT session reported moderate to large effect sizes than RT alone for cognitive inhibition and attention capacity. Taken together, the results suggest that even short-term exercise interventions can enhance overweight adults’ executive functions.
体育锻炼对认知的积极作用目前已形成共识。然而,运动强度对执行功能的影响仍不清楚。因此,本研究的目的是比较高强度有氧间歇训练(HIIT)、阻力训练(RT)或联合训练(RT+ HIIT)对超重非运动成年男性(18-30岁)执行功能指标的急性影响。参与者被筛选并排除已知影响认知功能的医疗条件,并通过Moca测试筛选认知。将36名成年人随机分为HIIT组、RT组、RT+HIIT组和对照组(n=10),直到能量消耗400-500 kcal,分别使用Stroop Test和d2 Test of attention检测认知抑制和注意能力,并在运动前和运动后1分钟立即对每种运动训练方式进行基线测量。HIIT方案后Stroop测试的认知抑制在阅读+5.89(η2=0.33)、颜色命名+9.0(η2=0.60)、干扰+10.1 (η2=0.39)和指数干扰域+6.0(η2=0.20)方面得到改善。此外,RT+HIIT组的阅读状况增加了+7.1(η2=0.40),颜色命名增加了+7.5(η2=0.80),干扰增加了+5.8(η2=0.39)。在注意能力方面,HIIT组的注意力集中水平为+21.7(η2=0.44),项目处理水平为+56.6 (η2=0.50),误差率为-3.0(η2=0.27)。RT组和RT+HIIT组在浓度水平和项目加工域上的结果相似(P<0.05)。总之,急性HIIT和RT+HIIT治疗比单独RT治疗对认知抑制和注意能力的影响中等到较大。综上所述,研究结果表明,即使是短期的运动干预也能增强超重成年人的执行功能。