White space interpretation in Hermann Rorschach’s inkblot test

A. Hunca-Bednarska
{"title":"White space interpretation in Hermann Rorschach’s inkblot test","authors":"A. Hunca-Bednarska","doi":"10.2478/cpp-2020-0021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction: The interpretation of white space in the Rorschach test has not been clearly defined. The aim of my research was to analyze the psychological meanings that can be associated with using space in Rorschach test responses. I examined a sample of healthy individuals in order to establish the basic meanings that could serve as points of reference when interpreting ill people’s responses. Material and method: I personally examined 158 healthy subjects with the Rorschach test. The examination procedure and the way of coding and interpreting responses were based on John Exner’s Comprehensive System. I divided the sample into three groups: I (no S responses), II (one or two S responses), and I II (three or more S responses). Next, I distinguished subgroup V (four or more S responses). I analyzed the differences between the groups in terms of other variables obtained in the examination using the Rorschach test. These variables were associated with using the complexity of the presented stimuli and with organizing the stimulus field; they were also associated with the emotional sphere, social adjustment, and ways of coping with stress. Results: Group III differed from groups II and I in terms of nine variables, and differences regarding further four variables approached significance. Differences between group V and the remaining examinees were more marked and concerned 14 variables. Discussion: Examinees with more S responses were better at using the complexity of stimuli and organizing the stimulus field. A certain characteristic feature of their emotional sphere also manifested itself: these people experienced situational stress more strongly, colored their responses with aggression, and more frequently experienced loneliness and alienation; intellectualization turned out to be their typical defense mechanism. Conclusions: Based on the collected material, it can be concluded that responses are related to examinees’ creative potential. Collected from healthy individuals, the material may facilitate the interpretation of ill people’s responses, especially as such research has not been conducted in a Polish population before.","PeriodicalId":56342,"journal":{"name":"Current Problems of Psychiatry","volume":"50 1","pages":"238 - 263"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Problems of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/cpp-2020-0021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: The interpretation of white space in the Rorschach test has not been clearly defined. The aim of my research was to analyze the psychological meanings that can be associated with using space in Rorschach test responses. I examined a sample of healthy individuals in order to establish the basic meanings that could serve as points of reference when interpreting ill people’s responses. Material and method: I personally examined 158 healthy subjects with the Rorschach test. The examination procedure and the way of coding and interpreting responses were based on John Exner’s Comprehensive System. I divided the sample into three groups: I (no S responses), II (one or two S responses), and I II (three or more S responses). Next, I distinguished subgroup V (four or more S responses). I analyzed the differences between the groups in terms of other variables obtained in the examination using the Rorschach test. These variables were associated with using the complexity of the presented stimuli and with organizing the stimulus field; they were also associated with the emotional sphere, social adjustment, and ways of coping with stress. Results: Group III differed from groups II and I in terms of nine variables, and differences regarding further four variables approached significance. Differences between group V and the remaining examinees were more marked and concerned 14 variables. Discussion: Examinees with more S responses were better at using the complexity of stimuli and organizing the stimulus field. A certain characteristic feature of their emotional sphere also manifested itself: these people experienced situational stress more strongly, colored their responses with aggression, and more frequently experienced loneliness and alienation; intellectualization turned out to be their typical defense mechanism. Conclusions: Based on the collected material, it can be concluded that responses are related to examinees’ creative potential. Collected from healthy individuals, the material may facilitate the interpretation of ill people’s responses, especially as such research has not been conducted in a Polish population before.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
罗夏墨迹测验中的空白解释
摘要引言:罗夏测验中空白的解释一直没有明确的定义。我的研究目的是分析在罗夏测试反应中使用空间的心理意义。我检查了一个健康个体的样本,以便在解释病人的反应时建立可以作为参考点的基本含义。材料与方法:本人亲自对158名健康受试者进行罗夏墨迹测验。考试程序和答卷的编码和解释方法以约翰·埃克斯纳的综合系统为基础。我将样本分为三组:I(没有S回答),II(一个或两个S回答)和I II(三个或更多S回答)。接下来,我区分了亚组V(四个或更多S反应)。我根据罗夏测验中获得的其他变量分析了两组之间的差异。这些变量与使用呈现刺激的复杂性和组织刺激场有关;它们还与情感领域、社会适应和应对压力的方式有关。结果:III组与II、I组在9个变量上存在差异,另外4个变量差异接近显著性。V组和其他考生之间的差异更明显,涉及14个变量。讨论:S反应越多的考生在使用刺激的复杂性和组织刺激场方面表现得更好。他们的情感领域的某些特征也表现出来:这些人经历了更强烈的情境压力,他们的反应带有攻击性,更频繁地经历孤独和疏远;理智化是他们典型的防御机制。结论:根据收集到的材料,可以得出答案与考生的创造潜力有关。从健康个体收集的材料可能有助于解释病人的反应,特别是因为以前从未在波兰人口中进行过此类研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The quarterly Current Problems of Psychiatry is a continuation of the volume "Research on Schizophrenia" and is addressed to a wide group of psychiatrists and clinical psychologists. The quarterly is a reviewed scientific journal of international scope, publishing original papers, review papers, case studies, conference reports, letters to the editor and book reviews. The aim of the "Current Problems of Psychiatry" is providing a wide audience with scientific works, representing a significant contribution to the development of psychiatry and clinical psychology. The works published in the journal are printed in Polish and English. Terms and Conditions for publishing manuscripts in the quarterly are available on the website www.cppsych.umlub.pl in the tab "Requirements".
期刊最新文献
Retrospective assessment of parental attitudes versus severity of early maladaptive schemas in a non-clinical population of Polish adults – preliminary reports Can an artist be mature? Rorschach studies of prominent Polish actors Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental state of Polish students Hungry brain: about the possible contribution of neurotrophic factors to anorexia nervosa Efficacy and safety assessment of different electrode placements during electroconvulsive therapy for the treatment of depression: a comparison of bitemporal, bifrontal and unilateral right-sided stimulation - a narrative review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1