Better I/O through byte-addressable, persistent memory

Jeremy Condit, Edmund B. Nightingale, Christopher Frost, Engin Ipek, Benjamin C. Lee, D. Burger, Derrick Coetzee
{"title":"Better I/O through byte-addressable, persistent memory","authors":"Jeremy Condit, Edmund B. Nightingale, Christopher Frost, Engin Ipek, Benjamin C. Lee, D. Burger, Derrick Coetzee","doi":"10.1145/1629575.1629589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Modern computer systems have been built around the assumption that persistent storage is accessed via a slow, block-based interface. However, new byte-addressable, persistent memory technologies such as phase change memory (PCM) offer fast, fine-grained access to persistent storage.\n In this paper, we present a file system and a hardware architecture that are designed around the properties of persistent, byteaddressable memory. Our file system, BPFS, uses a new technique called short-circuit shadow paging to provide atomic, fine-grained updates to persistent storage. As a result, BPFS provides strong reliability guarantees and offers better performance than traditional file systems, even when both are run on top of byte-addressable, persistent memory. Our hardware architecture enforces atomicity and ordering guarantees required by BPFS while still providing the performance benefits of the L1 and L2 caches.\n Since these memory technologies are not yet widely available, we evaluate BPFS on DRAM against NTFS on both a RAM disk and a traditional disk. Then, we use microarchitectural simulations to estimate the performance of BPFS on PCM. Despite providing strong safety and consistency guarantees, BPFS on DRAM is typically twice as fast as NTFS on a RAM disk and 4-10 times faster than NTFS on disk. We also show that BPFS on PCM should be significantly faster than a traditional disk-based file system.","PeriodicalId":20672,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Twenty-Third ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"887","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Twenty-Third ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1629575.1629589","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 887

Abstract

Modern computer systems have been built around the assumption that persistent storage is accessed via a slow, block-based interface. However, new byte-addressable, persistent memory technologies such as phase change memory (PCM) offer fast, fine-grained access to persistent storage. In this paper, we present a file system and a hardware architecture that are designed around the properties of persistent, byteaddressable memory. Our file system, BPFS, uses a new technique called short-circuit shadow paging to provide atomic, fine-grained updates to persistent storage. As a result, BPFS provides strong reliability guarantees and offers better performance than traditional file systems, even when both are run on top of byte-addressable, persistent memory. Our hardware architecture enforces atomicity and ordering guarantees required by BPFS while still providing the performance benefits of the L1 and L2 caches. Since these memory technologies are not yet widely available, we evaluate BPFS on DRAM against NTFS on both a RAM disk and a traditional disk. Then, we use microarchitectural simulations to estimate the performance of BPFS on PCM. Despite providing strong safety and consistency guarantees, BPFS on DRAM is typically twice as fast as NTFS on a RAM disk and 4-10 times faster than NTFS on disk. We also show that BPFS on PCM should be significantly faster than a traditional disk-based file system.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过字节可寻址的持久内存实现更好的I/O
现代计算机系统是围绕这样的假设构建的:通过缓慢的、基于块的接口访问持久存储。然而,新的字节可寻址的持久内存技术,如相变内存(PCM),提供了对持久存储的快速、细粒度访问。在本文中,我们提出了一个文件系统和硬件体系结构,它们是围绕持久的、字节可寻址内存的属性设计的。我们的文件系统BPFS使用一种称为短路影子分页的新技术,为持久存储提供原子的、细粒度的更新。因此,BPFS提供了强大的可靠性保证,并提供了比传统文件系统更好的性能,即使两者都运行在可字节寻址的持久内存上也是如此。我们的硬件架构强制执行BPFS所需的原子性和排序保证,同时仍然提供L1和L2缓存的性能优势。由于这些内存技术还没有广泛应用,我们对DRAM上的BPFS与RAM磁盘和传统磁盘上的NTFS进行了评估。然后,我们使用微架构模拟来评估BPFS在PCM上的性能。尽管提供了强大的安全性和一致性保证,但DRAM上的BPFS通常比RAM磁盘上的NTFS快两倍,比磁盘上的NTFS快4-10倍。我们还表明,PCM上的BPFS应该比传统的基于磁盘的文件系统快得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ResilientFL '21: Proceedings of the First Workshop on Systems Challenges in Reliable and Secure Federated Learning, Virtual Event / Koblenz, Germany, 25 October 2021 SOSP '21: ACM SIGOPS 28th Symposium on Operating Systems Principles, Virtual Event / Koblenz, Germany, October 26-29, 2021 Application Performance Monitoring: Trade-Off between Overhead Reduction and Maintainability Efficient deterministic multithreading through schedule relaxation SILT: a memory-efficient, high-performance key-value store
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1