Price Rigidity and Strategic Uncertainty: An Agent-Based Approach

R. Somogyi, J. Vincze
{"title":"Price Rigidity and Strategic Uncertainty: An Agent-Based Approach","authors":"R. Somogyi, J. Vincze","doi":"10.4018/jats.2011100104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The phenomenon of infrequent price changes has troubled economists for decades. Intuitively one feels that for most price-setters there exists a range of inaction, i.e., a substantial measure of the states of the world, within which they do not wish to modify prevailing prices. Economists wishing to maintain rationality of price-setters resorted to fixed price adjustment costs as an explanation for price rigidity. This paper proposes an alternative explanation, without recourse to any sort of physical adjustment cost, by putting strategic interaction into the center-stage of the analysis. Price-making is treated as a repeated oligopoly game. The traditional analysis of these games cannot pinpoint any equilibrium as a reasonable \"solution\" of the strategic situation. Thus, decision-makers have a genuine strategic uncertainty about the strategies of other decision-makers. Hesitation may lead to inaction. To model this situation, the authors follow the style of agent-based models, by modeling firms that change their pricing strategies following an evolutionary algorithm. In addition to reproducing the known negative relationship between price rigidity and the level of general inflation, the model exhibits several features observed in real data. Moreover, most prices fall into the theoretical \"range\" without explicitly building this property into strategies.","PeriodicalId":93648,"journal":{"name":"International journal of agent technologies and systems","volume":"45 1","pages":"57-69"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of agent technologies and systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/jats.2011100104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The phenomenon of infrequent price changes has troubled economists for decades. Intuitively one feels that for most price-setters there exists a range of inaction, i.e., a substantial measure of the states of the world, within which they do not wish to modify prevailing prices. Economists wishing to maintain rationality of price-setters resorted to fixed price adjustment costs as an explanation for price rigidity. This paper proposes an alternative explanation, without recourse to any sort of physical adjustment cost, by putting strategic interaction into the center-stage of the analysis. Price-making is treated as a repeated oligopoly game. The traditional analysis of these games cannot pinpoint any equilibrium as a reasonable "solution" of the strategic situation. Thus, decision-makers have a genuine strategic uncertainty about the strategies of other decision-makers. Hesitation may lead to inaction. To model this situation, the authors follow the style of agent-based models, by modeling firms that change their pricing strategies following an evolutionary algorithm. In addition to reproducing the known negative relationship between price rigidity and the level of general inflation, the model exhibits several features observed in real data. Moreover, most prices fall into the theoretical "range" without explicitly building this property into strategies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
价格刚性与战略不确定性:一个基于主体的方法
价格变动不频繁的现象困扰了经济学家几十年。人们直观地感觉到,对于大多数价格制定者来说,存在一个不作为的范围,即,在世界状态的很大程度上,他们不希望修改现行价格。经济学家希望维持价格制定者的理性,就用固定价格调整成本来解释价格刚性。本文通过将战略互动置于分析的中心,提出了一种不依赖于任何物理调整成本的替代解释。定价被视为一种重复的寡头垄断游戏。对这些博弈的传统分析无法将任何均衡定位为战略情境的合理“解决方案”。因此,决策者对其他决策者的战略具有真正的战略不确定性。犹豫可能导致无所作为。为了对这种情况进行建模,作者遵循了基于主体的模型的风格,通过对遵循进化算法改变其定价策略的公司进行建模。除了再现已知的价格刚性与一般通货膨胀水平之间的负相关关系外,该模型还展示了在实际数据中观察到的几个特征。此外,大多数价格跌入理论“区间”,而没有明确将这一属性纳入策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Novel Formal Agent-Based Simulation Modeling Framework of an AIDS Complex Adaptive System Artificial Minds with Consciousness and Common sense Aspects Cooperative Multi-Agent Joint Action Learning Algorithm (CMJAL) for Decision Making in Retail Shop Application Adaptive Congestion Controlled Multipath Routing in VANET: A Multiagent Based Approach The Meaningfulness of Statistical Significance Tests in the Analysis of Simulation Results
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1