The Story of the Open Pension Funds and the Employee Capital Plans in Poland. Will It Succeed This Time?

B. Błaszczyk
{"title":"The Story of the Open Pension Funds and the Employee Capital Plans in Poland. Will It Succeed This Time?","authors":"B. Błaszczyk","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3586519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Poland’s new Employee Capital Plans (PPK) scheme, which is mandatory for employers, started to be implemented in July 2019. The article looks at the systemic solutions applied in the programme from the perspective of the concept of the simultaneous reconstruction of the retirement pension system. The aim is to present arguments for and against the project from the point of view of various actors, and to assess the chances of success for the new system. The article offers a detailed study of legal solutions, an analysis of the literature on the subject, and reports of institutions that supervise pension funds. The results of this analysis point to the lack of cohesion between certain solutions of the 1999 pension reform and expose a lack of consistency in how the reform was carried out, which led to the eventual removal of the capital part of the pension system. The study shows that additional saving for old age is advisable in the country’s current demographic situation and necessary for both economic and social reasons. However, the systemic solutions offered by the government appear to be chiefly designated to serve short-term state interests and do not create sufficient incentives for pension plan participants to join the programme.","PeriodicalId":76903,"journal":{"name":"Employee benefits journal","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Employee benefits journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3586519","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Poland’s new Employee Capital Plans (PPK) scheme, which is mandatory for employers, started to be implemented in July 2019. The article looks at the systemic solutions applied in the programme from the perspective of the concept of the simultaneous reconstruction of the retirement pension system. The aim is to present arguments for and against the project from the point of view of various actors, and to assess the chances of success for the new system. The article offers a detailed study of legal solutions, an analysis of the literature on the subject, and reports of institutions that supervise pension funds. The results of this analysis point to the lack of cohesion between certain solutions of the 1999 pension reform and expose a lack of consistency in how the reform was carried out, which led to the eventual removal of the capital part of the pension system. The study shows that additional saving for old age is advisable in the country’s current demographic situation and necessary for both economic and social reasons. However, the systemic solutions offered by the government appear to be chiefly designated to serve short-term state interests and do not create sufficient incentives for pension plan participants to join the programme.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
波兰开放式养老基金与员工资本计划的故事。这次会成功吗?
波兰新的员工资本计划(PPK)计划于2019年7月开始实施,该计划对雇主是强制性的。本文从同时重建退休养恤金制度的概念出发,探讨方案中采用的系统解决办法。其目的是从不同参与者的角度提出支持和反对该项目的论据,并评估新系统成功的机会。本文对法律解决方案进行了详细研究,对有关该主题的文献进行了分析,并对监督养老基金的机构的报告进行了分析。这一分析的结果指出了1999年养老金改革的某些解决方案之间缺乏凝聚力,并暴露了改革的实施方式缺乏一致性,这导致了养老金制度的资本部分最终被取消。研究表明,在我国目前的人口状况下,为老年增加储蓄是可取的,而且从经济和社会两方面考虑都是必要的。然而,政府提供的系统性解决方案似乎主要是为短期国家利益服务,并没有为养老金计划参与者加入该计划创造足够的激励。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Proposal for Taking the Complexities Out of Taxing U.S. Retirement Distributions to Foreign Nationals Do Social Movements Spur Corporate Change? The Rise of “MeToo Termination Rights” in CEO Contracts Rules of Medical Necessity Does Employee Ownership Reduce Strike Risk? Evidence from U.S. Union Elections All that Glitters Is not Gold. Effects of Working from Home on Income Inequality at the Time of COVID-19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1