Characteristics of the salivary microbiota in cheilitis granulomatosa

Yang Liu, Qian Zhang, Xiaosheng Hu, Feng Chen, H. Hua
{"title":"Characteristics of the salivary microbiota in cheilitis granulomatosa","authors":"Yang Liu, Qian Zhang, Xiaosheng Hu, Feng Chen, H. Hua","doi":"10.4317/medoral.23041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Cheilitis granulomatosa (CG) is a disturbing and persistent idiopathic lip swelling. The cause and treatment has not been wholly elucidated. Some reports infer that CG is mainly associated with dental infection but no firm or reliable microbiological evidence has been provided for a causative organism. This study aimed to evaluate whether microorganisms contribute to the etiology of CG in order to inform appropriate treatment options in clinic. Material and Methods Unstimulated saliva was collected from 15 CG patients who were diagnosed clinically and pathologically and 15 healthy controls (HC). DNA was extracted from the precipitate of the centrifuged saliva for 16s rRNA high-throughput sequencing using the Miseq PE300 platform. The distribution of the microbiome between the two groups was compared. Results CG patients had a greater microbial flora that was more diverse than the HC. Prevotella, Alloprevotella, Porphyromonas, Actinomyces, Rothia, Fusobacterium, Haemophilus, and Aggregatibacter had a significantly higher abundance in CG patients. In contrast, Streptococcus and Campylobacter were the most abundant genera in HC with a mean relative abundance of 63% and 2%, respectively. The microbiological network indicated that most of the bacteria that were enriched at greater levels in CG patients were likely to be Prevotella, Actinomyces, and Rothia. These have been shown to co-exist with other bacteria. Conclusions: The composition and structure of bacterial communities in CG patients were different from HC. Most of the genera observed in CG patients were associated with periodontitis and pulp infection. These findings might be helpful in understanding the etiology of CG. Further study will be needed to confirm these findings and explore the underlying pathological mechanism. Key words:Cheilitis granulomatosa, 16s rRNA high-throughput sequencing, salivary microbiota.","PeriodicalId":18367,"journal":{"name":"Medicina Oral, Patología Oral y Cirugía Bucal","volume":"4 1","pages":"e719 - e725"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina Oral, Patología Oral y Cirugía Bucal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.23041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Background Cheilitis granulomatosa (CG) is a disturbing and persistent idiopathic lip swelling. The cause and treatment has not been wholly elucidated. Some reports infer that CG is mainly associated with dental infection but no firm or reliable microbiological evidence has been provided for a causative organism. This study aimed to evaluate whether microorganisms contribute to the etiology of CG in order to inform appropriate treatment options in clinic. Material and Methods Unstimulated saliva was collected from 15 CG patients who were diagnosed clinically and pathologically and 15 healthy controls (HC). DNA was extracted from the precipitate of the centrifuged saliva for 16s rRNA high-throughput sequencing using the Miseq PE300 platform. The distribution of the microbiome between the two groups was compared. Results CG patients had a greater microbial flora that was more diverse than the HC. Prevotella, Alloprevotella, Porphyromonas, Actinomyces, Rothia, Fusobacterium, Haemophilus, and Aggregatibacter had a significantly higher abundance in CG patients. In contrast, Streptococcus and Campylobacter were the most abundant genera in HC with a mean relative abundance of 63% and 2%, respectively. The microbiological network indicated that most of the bacteria that were enriched at greater levels in CG patients were likely to be Prevotella, Actinomyces, and Rothia. These have been shown to co-exist with other bacteria. Conclusions: The composition and structure of bacterial communities in CG patients were different from HC. Most of the genera observed in CG patients were associated with periodontitis and pulp infection. These findings might be helpful in understanding the etiology of CG. Further study will be needed to confirm these findings and explore the underlying pathological mechanism. Key words:Cheilitis granulomatosa, 16s rRNA high-throughput sequencing, salivary microbiota.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肉芽肿性口唇炎唾液菌群的特征
背景:肉芽肿性唇炎(CG)是一种困扰和持续的特发性唇部肿胀。病因和治疗方法尚未完全阐明。一些报告推断,CG主要与牙齿感染有关,但没有确凿或可靠的微生物证据证明是致病微生物。本研究旨在评估微生物是否与CG的病因有关,以便为临床提供适当的治疗方案。材料与方法收集15例经临床及病理诊断的CG患者和15例健康对照(HC)的非刺激唾液。从离心唾液沉淀中提取DNA,使用Miseq PE300平台进行16s rRNA高通量测序。比较两组菌群的分布情况。结果CG患者的微生物菌群比HC患者更多样化。普雷沃氏菌、异丙普雷沃氏菌、卟啉单胞菌、放线菌、罗氏菌、梭杆菌、嗜血杆菌和聚集杆菌在CG患者中有显著较高的丰度。相比之下,链球菌和弯曲杆菌是HC中最丰富的属,平均相对丰度分别为63%和2%。微生物网络表明,在CG患者中,大多数细菌的富集水平较高,可能是普雷沃氏菌,放线菌和罗氏菌。这些细菌已被证明与其他细菌共存。结论:CG患者的细菌群落组成和结构与HC患者不同。在CG患者中观察到的大多数属与牙周炎和牙髓感染有关。这些发现可能有助于了解CG的病因。需要进一步的研究来证实这些发现并探索其潜在的病理机制。关键词:肉芽肿性樱桃炎,16s rRNA高通量测序,唾液微生物群
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Actinic cheilitis: Proposal of a clinical index Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the orthognathic quality of life questionnaire in patients with dentofacial deformity Endoscopic findings in periapical surgery. A cross-sectional study of 206 roots Ameloblastomas mimicking apical periodontitis: a case series Influence of root width and dentin wall thickness evaluated by endoscopy upon the outcome of periapical surgery. A cohort study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1