The Impact of Religion in Situational Crisis Communication Theory: An Examination of Religious Rhetoric and Religiosity

IF 0.7 0 RELIGION Journal of Media and Religion Pub Date : 2022-04-03 DOI:10.1080/15348423.2022.2059327
Jordan Morehouse, Lucinda L. Austin
{"title":"The Impact of Religion in Situational Crisis Communication Theory: An Examination of Religious Rhetoric and Religiosity","authors":"Jordan Morehouse, Lucinda L. Austin","doi":"10.1080/15348423.2022.2059327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Crisis communication scholars have not fully explored crises within religious organizations, including the impact of religious rhetoric in crisis responses or stakeholder’s religiosity. This study conducted a survey-experiment to examine recommended crisis response strategies, based on the Situational Crisis Communication Theory (SCCT), with and without religious rhetoric to explore the impact of religious rhetoric and religiosity on stakeholder’s skepticism, attitudes, trust, and supportive intentions. Results provide support for SCCT strategies and suggest that no religious rhetoric in post-crisis communication resulted in more supportive attitudes toward the organization. This study advances crisis communication theorizing by arguing that stakeholder identity – including religiosity – should be considered when responding to crises with a religious component, or crises within religious organizations.","PeriodicalId":55954,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Media and Religion","volume":"38 1","pages":"105 - 123"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Media and Religion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15348423.2022.2059327","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT Crisis communication scholars have not fully explored crises within religious organizations, including the impact of religious rhetoric in crisis responses or stakeholder’s religiosity. This study conducted a survey-experiment to examine recommended crisis response strategies, based on the Situational Crisis Communication Theory (SCCT), with and without religious rhetoric to explore the impact of religious rhetoric and religiosity on stakeholder’s skepticism, attitudes, trust, and supportive intentions. Results provide support for SCCT strategies and suggest that no religious rhetoric in post-crisis communication resulted in more supportive attitudes toward the organization. This study advances crisis communication theorizing by arguing that stakeholder identity – including religiosity – should be considered when responding to crises with a religious component, or crises within religious organizations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
情境危机传播理论中的宗教影响:宗教修辞与宗教性考察
危机传播学者尚未充分探讨宗教组织内部的危机,包括宗教修辞在危机应对中的影响或利益相关者的宗教信仰。本研究以情境危机沟通理论(SCCT)为基础,采用调查实验的方法,探讨在有宗教修辞和没有宗教修辞的情况下,宗教修辞和宗教虔诚对利益相关者怀疑、态度、信任和支持意向的影响。研究结果为SCCT策略提供了支持,并表明危机后沟通中没有宗教修辞会导致对组织的支持态度增加。本研究提出,在应对带有宗教成分的危机或宗教组织内部的危机时,应考虑利益相关者的身份(包括宗教信仰),从而推进了危机沟通理论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊最新文献
Still Fighting the God-Vs.-Gays Battle: Twitter Reaction to Presidential Candidate Pete Buttigieg’s Identification as a Gay Member of the Christian Left Tweeting for Religion: How Indonesian Islamic Fundamentalist Organizations Use Twitter Differences in Religious Framing of Muslims and Islam in American Media Coverage Before and After the Trump Campaign Faith Discourses in the Context of Racial Tension: Black Lives Matter and Its Counter-Narratives Digital Merit: A Case Study of a Chinese Buddhist Meditation Group on WeChat During the Early Outbreak of Covid-19 in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1