Couldn’t care less? A psychosocial analysis of contemporary cancer care policy as a case of borderline welfare

IF 0.2 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Psychosocial Studies Pub Date : 2020-09-17 DOI:10.1332/147867320X15985348674895
B. H. Gripsrud, Ellen Ramvi, Bjørn Ribers
{"title":"Couldn’t care less? A psychosocial analysis of contemporary cancer care policy as a case of borderline welfare","authors":"B. H. Gripsrud, Ellen Ramvi, Bjørn Ribers","doi":"10.1332/147867320X15985348674895","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article engages with recent shifts in public healthcare policy in Norway through a psychosocial analysis of contemporary cancer care, which evokes the hope of cure and reparation in the psychosocial imaginary. With increasing incidence and prevalence, cancer is a persistent challenge for public health services. Policy makers therefore emphasise that resources must be prioritised while ensuring good-quality care for vulnerable citizens. In 2015, Norway implemented integrated patient pathways as national guidelines to standardise clinical assessment and medical treatment for patients with a suspected cancer diagnosis. In a text analysis of ‘the integrated breast cancer pathway’ as a framework for practice, we found the concept and practice of care absent. There were sparse descriptions of the relational responsibilities of health professionals, beyond informing and communicating. From a psychosocial care understanding, we problematise how the emphasis on information delivery presupposes a universally autonomous, competent, resilient and rational patient, rather than a particular human being with complex thoughts, feelings, needs and vulnerabilities in the face of a life-threatening illness. We refer to wider issues effected by neoliberal governance, which may profoundly impact on the relationship between professionals and patients. We raise the concern that integrated cancer care is a case of borderline welfare, characterised by a fear of feelings associated with mutual vulnerabilities and dependencies. We identify values and ethical pressures at stake in an emerging careless policy in Norwegian welfare, in light of the government’s stated ambition to become an international role model for good patient trajectories.","PeriodicalId":29710,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychosocial Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychosocial Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/147867320X15985348674895","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This article engages with recent shifts in public healthcare policy in Norway through a psychosocial analysis of contemporary cancer care, which evokes the hope of cure and reparation in the psychosocial imaginary. With increasing incidence and prevalence, cancer is a persistent challenge for public health services. Policy makers therefore emphasise that resources must be prioritised while ensuring good-quality care for vulnerable citizens. In 2015, Norway implemented integrated patient pathways as national guidelines to standardise clinical assessment and medical treatment for patients with a suspected cancer diagnosis. In a text analysis of ‘the integrated breast cancer pathway’ as a framework for practice, we found the concept and practice of care absent. There were sparse descriptions of the relational responsibilities of health professionals, beyond informing and communicating. From a psychosocial care understanding, we problematise how the emphasis on information delivery presupposes a universally autonomous, competent, resilient and rational patient, rather than a particular human being with complex thoughts, feelings, needs and vulnerabilities in the face of a life-threatening illness. We refer to wider issues effected by neoliberal governance, which may profoundly impact on the relationship between professionals and patients. We raise the concern that integrated cancer care is a case of borderline welfare, characterised by a fear of feelings associated with mutual vulnerabilities and dependencies. We identify values and ethical pressures at stake in an emerging careless policy in Norwegian welfare, in light of the government’s stated ambition to become an international role model for good patient trajectories.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一点都不在乎?以边缘福利为例的当代癌症护理政策的社会心理分析
本文通过对当代癌症护理的社会心理分析,探讨了挪威公共医疗保健政策的最新转变,唤起了社会心理想象中治愈和修复的希望。随着发病率和流行率的增加,癌症是公共卫生服务面临的一个持续挑战。因此,政策制定者强调,必须优先分配资源,同时确保为弱势公民提供高质量的护理。2015年,挪威实施了综合患者路径作为国家指南,以规范疑似癌症诊断患者的临床评估和医疗。在“综合乳腺癌途径”作为实践框架的文本分析中,我们发现护理的概念和实践缺失。除了告知和沟通之外,对卫生专业人员的关系责任的描述很少。从社会心理护理的理解来看,我们提出了一个问题,即强调信息传递的前提是一个普遍自主、有能力、有弹性和理性的病人,而不是一个面对威胁生命的疾病时具有复杂思想、情感、需求和脆弱性的特定人类。我们指的是受新自由主义治理影响的更广泛的问题,这可能对专业人员和患者之间的关系产生深远的影响。我们提出这样的担忧,即综合癌症治疗是一种边缘性福利,其特征是对相互脆弱性和依赖性相关的情感的恐惧。鉴于挪威政府宣称的成为良好患者轨迹的国际榜样的雄心,我们确定了挪威福利新出现的粗心政策的价值观和伦理压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Can religion be rescued in the 21st century? On Erich Fromm’s religious humanism in an age of authoritarian populism Racial trauma as an unlaid ghost of empire The haunting melody of loss in the racist imagination Racism, hatred and melancholic curiosity Stoking hate: configuring loss in explanations of racially aggravated crime
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1