Cesarean section is not associated with increased risk of celiac disease in the offspring: a meta-analysis

X. Yang, Yihui Liu, Hai-yin Jiang, Xian Ying
{"title":"Cesarean section is not associated with increased risk of celiac disease in the offspring: a meta-analysis","authors":"X. Yang, Yihui Liu, Hai-yin Jiang, Xian Ying","doi":"10.1080/14767058.2022.2048813","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective Epidemiologic findings are inconsistent concerning the association between cesarean section (C-section) and celiac disease in offspring. Methods We performed a systematic literature search of PubMed and Embase databases until July 2021. A meta-analysis was performed for each outcome in which a summary odds ratio (OR) was calculated while taking heterogeneity into account. Results A total of 11 observational were identified for the literature review. We found that C-section was not associated with an increase in the risk of CD (OR = 1.03, 95% CI, 0.95–1.12; p = .501). In subgroup analyses, the association remained insignificant for both infants born after elective C-section (OR 1.05; 0.95–1.16; p = .329) and emergency C-section (OR 1.06; 1–1.13; p = .051). Conclusions Our results indicate that C-section is not associated with CD in offspring.","PeriodicalId":22921,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine","volume":"41 1","pages":"9570 - 9577"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2022.2048813","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract Objective Epidemiologic findings are inconsistent concerning the association between cesarean section (C-section) and celiac disease in offspring. Methods We performed a systematic literature search of PubMed and Embase databases until July 2021. A meta-analysis was performed for each outcome in which a summary odds ratio (OR) was calculated while taking heterogeneity into account. Results A total of 11 observational were identified for the literature review. We found that C-section was not associated with an increase in the risk of CD (OR = 1.03, 95% CI, 0.95–1.12; p = .501). In subgroup analyses, the association remained insignificant for both infants born after elective C-section (OR 1.05; 0.95–1.16; p = .329) and emergency C-section (OR 1.06; 1–1.13; p = .051). Conclusions Our results indicate that C-section is not associated with CD in offspring.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
剖宫产与后代患乳糜泻风险增加无关:一项荟萃分析
【摘要】目的剖宫产术与子代乳糜泻相关性的流行病学研究结果并不一致。方法我们对PubMed和Embase数据库进行了系统的文献检索,直到2021年7月。对每个结果进行荟萃分析,在考虑异质性的同时计算总结优势比(OR)。结果本研究共纳入11例观察性病例。我们发现,剖腹产与CD风险增加无关(OR = 1.03, 95% CI, 0.95-1.12;p = .501)。在亚组分析中,选择性剖腹产后出生的婴儿的相关性仍然不显著(OR 1.05;0.95 - -1.16;p = .329)和紧急剖腹产(OR 1.06;1 - 1.13;p = .051)。结论我们的研究结果表明,剖腹产与后代的CD无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The impact of specialty training and physician attitudes on fetal cardiac counseling Fetoplacental unit involvement in uric acid production in women with severe preeclampsia: a prospective case control pilot study. Causal association of sex hormone-binding globulin on gestational hypertension and pre-eclampsia: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study Targeted metabolomic analysis of early-trimester serum identifies potential mechanisms for late-onset preeclampsia Statement of retraction: effect of daily consumption of probiotic yoghurt on lipid profiles in pregnant women: a randomized controlled clinical trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1