Racial Formations

IF 0.5 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY INTERNATIONAL HISTORY REVIEW Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.5040/9781474204538.ch-007
Michael Omi, H. Winant
{"title":"Racial Formations","authors":"Michael Omi, H. Winant","doi":"10.5040/9781474204538.ch-007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1982-83, Susie Guillory Phipps unsuccessfully sued the Louisiana Bureau of Vital Records to change her racial classification from black to white. The descendant of an eighteenth-century white planter and a black slave, Phipps was designated \"black\" in her birth certificate in accordance with a 1970 state law which declared anyone with at least one-thirty-second \"Negro blood\" to be black. The legal battle raised intriguing questions about the concept of race, its meaning in contemporary society, and its use (and abuse) in public policy. Assistant Attorney General Ron Davis defended the law by pointing out that some type of racial classification was necessary to comply with federal record-keeping requirements and to facilitate programs for the prevention of genetic diseases. Phipps's attorney, Brian Begue, argued that the assignment of racial categories on birth certificates was unconstitutional and that the one-thirty-second designation was inaccurate. He called on a retired Tulane University professor who cited research indicating that most whites have one-twentieth \"Negro\" ancestry. In the end, Phipps lost. The court upheld a state law which quantified racial identity, and in so doing affirmed the legality of assigning individuals to specific racial groupings.","PeriodicalId":46534,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL HISTORY REVIEW","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"36","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTERNATIONAL HISTORY REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474204538.ch-007","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 36

Abstract

In 1982-83, Susie Guillory Phipps unsuccessfully sued the Louisiana Bureau of Vital Records to change her racial classification from black to white. The descendant of an eighteenth-century white planter and a black slave, Phipps was designated "black" in her birth certificate in accordance with a 1970 state law which declared anyone with at least one-thirty-second "Negro blood" to be black. The legal battle raised intriguing questions about the concept of race, its meaning in contemporary society, and its use (and abuse) in public policy. Assistant Attorney General Ron Davis defended the law by pointing out that some type of racial classification was necessary to comply with federal record-keeping requirements and to facilitate programs for the prevention of genetic diseases. Phipps's attorney, Brian Begue, argued that the assignment of racial categories on birth certificates was unconstitutional and that the one-thirty-second designation was inaccurate. He called on a retired Tulane University professor who cited research indicating that most whites have one-twentieth "Negro" ancestry. In the end, Phipps lost. The court upheld a state law which quantified racial identity, and in so doing affirmed the legality of assigning individuals to specific racial groupings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
种族的形成
1982年至1983年,苏西·吉洛里·菲普斯起诉路易斯安那州生命记录局,要求将她的种族分类从黑人改为白人,但没有成功。菲普斯是18世纪一个白人种植园主和一个黑人奴隶的后代,根据1970年的一项州法律,她在出生证明上被指定为“黑人”,该法律宣布任何至少有32分之一“黑人血统”的人都是黑人。这场法律之争引发了关于种族概念、种族在当代社会中的意义以及种族在公共政策中的使用(和滥用)等有趣的问题。助理司法部长罗恩·戴维斯(Ron Davis)为这项法律辩护,他指出,为了遵守联邦记录保存要求和促进预防遗传疾病的项目,某种类型的种族分类是必要的。菲普斯的律师布莱恩·贝格(Brian Begue)认为,在出生证明上划分种族类别是违宪的,1 / 32秒的划分是不准确的。他拜访了杜兰大学的一位退休教授,这位教授引用了一项研究,表明大多数白人都有二十分之一的“黑人”血统。最后,菲普斯输了。法院支持了一项量化种族身份的州法律,从而确认了将个人划分为特定种族群体的合法性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: The International History Review is the only English-language quarterly devoted entirely to the history of international relations and the history of international thought. Since 1979 the Review has established itself as one of the premier History journals in the world, read and regularly cited by both political scientists and historians. The Review serves as a bridge between historical research and the study of international relations. The Review publishes articles exploring the history of international relations and the history of international thought. The editors particularly welcome submissions that explore the history of current conflicts and conflicts of current interest; the development of international thought; diplomatic history.
期刊最新文献
Notes on Contributors Fascist Cultural Diplomacy and Italian Foreign Policy in Norway from the 1930s until the Second World War Ankara in Chinese Imagination: Turkish Capital and Its Influence on ‘Temporary Capital’ Chongqing Time to treat the climate and nature crisis as one indivisible global health emergency The Suez Crisis and Dag Hammarskjöld’s Mediation: Biased or Balanced? A View from Cairo
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1