Analysis of Volatile Flavor Compounds and Physicochemical Properties in Conventional and Organic Pork Meats Using SPME-GC-MS

Cristina Lopez-Moreno, Sara Fernandez-Palacios Campos, Sergio Ledesma Baena, Juan Teodomiro Lopez Navarrete, Juan Carlos Otero Fernandez de Molina
{"title":"Analysis of Volatile Flavor Compounds and Physicochemical Properties in Conventional and Organic Pork Meats Using SPME-GC-MS","authors":"Cristina Lopez-Moreno, Sara Fernandez-Palacios Campos, Sergio Ledesma Baena, Juan Teodomiro Lopez Navarrete, Juan Carlos Otero Fernandez de Molina","doi":"10.37256/fse.4220232425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Volatiles responsible for aroma and flavor were investigated in the main types of pork consumed in Spain: duroc and white pigs, the latter reared according to organic and conventional procedures. The main volatiles were detected and identified by SPME-GC-MS technique in three different anatomical parts of the animals: ham, loin and tenderloin. Other physicochemical characteristics such as moisture, pH and tenderness were also evaluated, although no significant correlation was found between them and the volatiles studied. All duroc (minuscule) pork samples presented a higher sum of aldehydes and alcohols (26.8% on average), with pleasant aromas and remarkable values of odorous activity, than the white pork samples (17.5% on average). When comparing the white pig samples, the data showed a higher amount of aldehydes and alcohols in the tenderloin of the organic pork samples (17.9% versus 10.28%), which could benefit the flavor of this anatomical part. However, in the case of ham samples, aldehydes and alcohols were found to be more abundant in the conventional pork samples (22.2% versus 14.0%). The data obtained were subjected to a principal component analysis (PCA) in which a clear association was found between some volatiles and the rearing system adopted. In particular, a relationship was observed between organic pork ham samples and the compound glycerol-1-myristate (pleasant odor). The compound 4-isopropylcyclohexylamine (unpleasant odor) and organic pork loin samples were also correlated. A discriminant analysis (DA) was performed using a selection of volatiles, obtaining valuable results for the distinction of the origin of pork meat, after an adequate validation of the analytical method.","PeriodicalId":15835,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Science and Engineering","volume":"114 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37256/fse.4220232425","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Volatiles responsible for aroma and flavor were investigated in the main types of pork consumed in Spain: duroc and white pigs, the latter reared according to organic and conventional procedures. The main volatiles were detected and identified by SPME-GC-MS technique in three different anatomical parts of the animals: ham, loin and tenderloin. Other physicochemical characteristics such as moisture, pH and tenderness were also evaluated, although no significant correlation was found between them and the volatiles studied. All duroc (minuscule) pork samples presented a higher sum of aldehydes and alcohols (26.8% on average), with pleasant aromas and remarkable values of odorous activity, than the white pork samples (17.5% on average). When comparing the white pig samples, the data showed a higher amount of aldehydes and alcohols in the tenderloin of the organic pork samples (17.9% versus 10.28%), which could benefit the flavor of this anatomical part. However, in the case of ham samples, aldehydes and alcohols were found to be more abundant in the conventional pork samples (22.2% versus 14.0%). The data obtained were subjected to a principal component analysis (PCA) in which a clear association was found between some volatiles and the rearing system adopted. In particular, a relationship was observed between organic pork ham samples and the compound glycerol-1-myristate (pleasant odor). The compound 4-isopropylcyclohexylamine (unpleasant odor) and organic pork loin samples were also correlated. A discriminant analysis (DA) was performed using a selection of volatiles, obtaining valuable results for the distinction of the origin of pork meat, after an adequate validation of the analytical method.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用SPME-GC-MS分析传统猪肉和有机猪肉中挥发性风味物质及其理化性质
对西班牙消费的主要猪肉类型(杜洛克猪和白猪)中负责香气和风味的挥发物进行了调查,后者根据有机和传统程序饲养。采用SPME-GC-MS技术对鸡腿、腰和里脊三个不同解剖部位的主要挥发物进行了检测和鉴定。其他物理化学特性,如水分、pH值和柔软度也进行了评估,尽管它们与所研究的挥发物之间没有发现显著的相关性。所有杜洛克(微小)猪肉样品的醛类和醇类含量(平均26.8%)都高于白猪肉样品(平均17.5%),具有令人愉悦的香气和显著的气味活性值。对比白猪样品,数据显示有机猪肉样品里脊中的醛类和醇类含量更高(17.9%比10.28%),这有利于该解剖部位的风味。然而,在火腿样本中,醛类和醇类在传统猪肉样本中含量更高(22.2%比14.0%)。获得的数据进行了主成分分析(PCA),其中发现一些挥发物与所采用的饲养系统之间存在明显的关联。特别是,有机猪肉火腿样品与化合物甘油-1肉豆蔻酸酯(令人愉快的气味)之间存在关系。化合物4-异丙基环己胺(难闻气味)与有机猪里脊肉样品也有相关性。选择挥发物进行判别分析(DA),在对分析方法进行充分验证后,获得了区分猪肉来源的有价值的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Influence of Fermentation Time on the Nutritional and Antioxidant Properties of Black Garlic Valorizing Shrimp Shell as a Source of Chitin with Crude Enzymes from Germinated Winter Wheat and Buckwheat Physico-Mechanical, Nutritional, and Sensorial Properties of Gluten-Free Chips with Almond Powder Dried Using Different Drying Methods Proposed Design and In-silico Studies of Functional Idli as a Prophylactic Measure to Reduce Post-Menopausal Adverse Effects in Women Development and Evaluation of High Protein Spread Based on Aquafaba
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1