Cosmography and/in the Academy: Authorizing the Ideological Pathways of Empire

IF 0.1 0 CLASSICS Exemplaria Classica Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI:10.1080/10412573.2023.2186029
Nedda Mehdizadeh
{"title":"Cosmography and/in the Academy: Authorizing the Ideological Pathways of Empire","authors":"Nedda Mehdizadeh","doi":"10.1080/10412573.2023.2186029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article examines how the study of premodern cosmographical knowledge in the modern classroom can educate students about how knowledge is made. Through my discussion of a course unit that considers Richard Hakluyt’s Principall Navigations (1589) in conversation with Sebastian Münster’s Cosmographia (1544), I demonstrate how these premodern visions of the world created ideological pathways toward imperial and racial violence. White, European cosmographers developed a genre of knowledge production about the world, and these generic conventions both authorized their perspectives and established a conceptual mapping toward empire that early modern cartographers and travel writers would reproduce and expand. These cosmographers, cartographers, and travel writers utilized these conventions to legitimize their visions of the world. I argue that these ideological pathways extend the theoretical and empirical work of these writings into course curricula, and continue to inform how knowledge is produced.","PeriodicalId":40762,"journal":{"name":"Exemplaria Classica","volume":"10 1","pages":"66 - 89"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exemplaria Classica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10412573.2023.2186029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article examines how the study of premodern cosmographical knowledge in the modern classroom can educate students about how knowledge is made. Through my discussion of a course unit that considers Richard Hakluyt’s Principall Navigations (1589) in conversation with Sebastian Münster’s Cosmographia (1544), I demonstrate how these premodern visions of the world created ideological pathways toward imperial and racial violence. White, European cosmographers developed a genre of knowledge production about the world, and these generic conventions both authorized their perspectives and established a conceptual mapping toward empire that early modern cartographers and travel writers would reproduce and expand. These cosmographers, cartographers, and travel writers utilized these conventions to legitimize their visions of the world. I argue that these ideological pathways extend the theoretical and empirical work of these writings into course curricula, and continue to inform how knowledge is produced.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宇宙学和/在学院:授权帝国的意识形态路径
本文探讨了在现代课堂上对前现代宇宙论知识的学习如何教育学生认识到知识是如何产生的。通过我对一个课程单元的讨论,我考虑了理查德·哈克卢伊特的《主要航海》(1589)与塞巴斯蒂安·米斯特的《世界》(1544)的对话,我展示了这些前现代的世界观如何创造了通往帝国和种族暴力的意识形态途径。然而,欧洲的宇宙学家发展了一种关于世界的知识生产类型,这些通用的惯例既授权了他们的观点,又建立了一个关于帝国的概念地图,早期的现代制图师和旅行作家将复制和扩展。这些宇宙学家、地图学家和旅行作家利用这些惯例使他们对世界的看法合法化。我认为,这些意识形态途径将这些著作的理论和实证工作扩展到课程课程中,并继续告知知识是如何产生的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Tra Iporchemi e Parteni (Pindaro, Hyporch. F9 Recchia) Il Paratesto in Catullo: alcune riflessioni su un saggio recente Pelasgus Sacca. Una nuova testimonianza su Sacada di Argo e alcune osservazioni sulla fortuna umanistica dei Deipnosofisti di Ateneo Cynthia e lo statuto dinamico dell’elegia, tra dream narrative, arte figurativa e modelli epici Olympica Pindarica (I)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1