The Effect of Sourcing Policies on a Supplier's Sustainable Practices

Vishal V. Agrawal, Deishin Lee
{"title":"The Effect of Sourcing Policies on a Supplier's Sustainable Practices","authors":"Vishal V. Agrawal, Deishin Lee","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2601974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Consumers today increasingly care about the process characteristics of the supply chain that created their product, such as the environmental impact of the processes. To meet this growing demand for sustainably produced products, firm must be able to source sustainably produced parts from their suppliers. In this paper, we analyze when and how buyers (manufacturers or retailers) can use sourcing policies to influence their suppliers to adopt sustainable processes that meet certain sustainability criteria. We study two sustainable sourcing policies commonly observed in practice, which influence supplier process decisions by committing to offer sustainable products. Under a Sustainable Preferred sourcing policy, a buyer commits to offering a sustainable product if she can source sustainably produced parts from the supplier, but otherwise will offer a conventional product. In contrast, under a Sustainable Required sourcing policy, the buyer will only offer a sustainable product, and therefore will only source from the supplier if he has adopted a sustainable process. We find that both the Preferred and Required policies can deter the supplier from switching to a sustainable process when the premium for the sustainable product is high. Moreover, the buyer can actually benefit from using the Preferred policy to deter the supplier. The Required policy can induce the supplier to switch but only when the premium for the sustainable product is low. However, the buyer may still benefit from using the Required policy to induce switching. We also consider the effect of supplier competition and show that both the Preferred and Required policies can deter or induce the supplier from switching to a sustainable process. However, the buyer never finds it beneficial to deter a supplier in the presence of supplier competition, and will only use a sustainable sourcing policy to induce switching.","PeriodicalId":12584,"journal":{"name":"Global Commodity Issues eJournal","volume":"96 3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"37","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Commodity Issues eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2601974","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 37

Abstract

Consumers today increasingly care about the process characteristics of the supply chain that created their product, such as the environmental impact of the processes. To meet this growing demand for sustainably produced products, firm must be able to source sustainably produced parts from their suppliers. In this paper, we analyze when and how buyers (manufacturers or retailers) can use sourcing policies to influence their suppliers to adopt sustainable processes that meet certain sustainability criteria. We study two sustainable sourcing policies commonly observed in practice, which influence supplier process decisions by committing to offer sustainable products. Under a Sustainable Preferred sourcing policy, a buyer commits to offering a sustainable product if she can source sustainably produced parts from the supplier, but otherwise will offer a conventional product. In contrast, under a Sustainable Required sourcing policy, the buyer will only offer a sustainable product, and therefore will only source from the supplier if he has adopted a sustainable process. We find that both the Preferred and Required policies can deter the supplier from switching to a sustainable process when the premium for the sustainable product is high. Moreover, the buyer can actually benefit from using the Preferred policy to deter the supplier. The Required policy can induce the supplier to switch but only when the premium for the sustainable product is low. However, the buyer may still benefit from using the Required policy to induce switching. We also consider the effect of supplier competition and show that both the Preferred and Required policies can deter or induce the supplier from switching to a sustainable process. However, the buyer never finds it beneficial to deter a supplier in the presence of supplier competition, and will only use a sustainable sourcing policy to induce switching.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
采购政策对供应商可持续实践的影响
今天的消费者越来越关心制造他们产品的供应链的过程特征,例如过程对环境的影响。为了满足对可持续生产产品日益增长的需求,公司必须能够从供应商处采购可持续生产的部件。在本文中,我们分析了买家(制造商或零售商)何时以及如何使用采购政策来影响其供应商采用符合某些可持续性标准的可持续流程。我们研究了实践中常见的两种可持续采购政策,它们通过承诺提供可持续产品来影响供应商流程决策。在可持续优先采购政策下,如果买方可以从供应商处采购可持续生产的部件,则买方承诺提供可持续产品,否则将提供传统产品。相比之下,在可持续采购政策下,买方只会提供可持续的产品,因此,如果他采用了可持续的流程,他只会从供应商那里采购。我们发现,当可持续产品的溢价较高时,首选策略和要求策略都可以阻止供应商转向可持续过程。此外,买方实际上可以从使用优选政策来阻止供应商中获益。当可持续产品的溢价较低时,所需政策可以诱导供应商进行转换。然而,买方仍可能受益于使用Required策略来诱导转换。我们还考虑了供应商竞争的影响,并表明首选政策和要求政策都可以阻止或诱导供应商转向可持续过程。然而,在存在供应商竞争的情况下,买方永远不会发现阻止供应商是有益的,而只会使用可持续的采购政策来诱导转换。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Manufacturer Encroachment in a Product Market and Common Ownership between Supply Chain Parties WTO आणि ग्रामीण विकासात कृषी (Agriculture in the WTO and Rural Development) Mechanics of Global Value Chains: India's Perspective A Block-Chain of Things (BcoT) Based System for Detecting Counterfeit Products in Supply Chain Management Are commodity futures a hedge against inflation? A Markov-switching approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1