Remote primary care during the COVID-19 pandemic for people experiencing homelessness: a qualitative study

K. Howells, Mat Amp, Martin Burrows, Jo-Ann Brown, R. Brennan, Joanne Dickinson, Shaun Jackson, Wan-Ley Yeung, D. Ashcroft, S. Campbell, T. Blakeman, C. Sanders
{"title":"Remote primary care during the COVID-19 pandemic for people experiencing homelessness: a qualitative study","authors":"K. Howells, Mat Amp, Martin Burrows, Jo-Ann Brown, R. Brennan, Joanne Dickinson, Shaun Jackson, Wan-Ley Yeung, D. Ashcroft, S. Campbell, T. Blakeman, C. Sanders","doi":"10.3399/BJGP.2021.0596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background The COVID-19 pandemic has caused unprecedented disruption and change to the organisation of primary care, including for people experiencing homelessness who may not have access to a phone. Little is known about whether the recent changes required to deliver services to people experiencing homelessness will help to address or compound inequality in accessing care. Aim To explore the experience and impact of organisational and technology changes in response to COVID-19 on access to health care for people experiencing homelessness. Design and setting An action-led and participatory research methodology was employed in three case study sites made up of primary care services delivering care for people experiencing homelessness. Method Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with 21 people experiencing homelessness and 22 clinicians and support workers. Interviews were analysed using a framework approach. Results The move to remote telephone consultations highlighted the difficulties experienced by participants in accessing health care. These barriers included problems at the practice level associated with remote triage as participants did not always have access to a phone or the means to pay for a phone call. This fostered increased reliance on support workers and clinicians working in the community to provide or facilitate a primary care appointment. Conclusion The findings have emphasised the importance of addressing practical and technology barriers as well as supporting communication and choice for mode of consultation. The authors argue that consultations should not be remote ‘by default’ and instead take into consideration both the clinical and social factors underpinning health.","PeriodicalId":22333,"journal":{"name":"The British Journal of General Practice","volume":"114 1","pages":"e492 - e500"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2021.0596","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Background The COVID-19 pandemic has caused unprecedented disruption and change to the organisation of primary care, including for people experiencing homelessness who may not have access to a phone. Little is known about whether the recent changes required to deliver services to people experiencing homelessness will help to address or compound inequality in accessing care. Aim To explore the experience and impact of organisational and technology changes in response to COVID-19 on access to health care for people experiencing homelessness. Design and setting An action-led and participatory research methodology was employed in three case study sites made up of primary care services delivering care for people experiencing homelessness. Method Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with 21 people experiencing homelessness and 22 clinicians and support workers. Interviews were analysed using a framework approach. Results The move to remote telephone consultations highlighted the difficulties experienced by participants in accessing health care. These barriers included problems at the practice level associated with remote triage as participants did not always have access to a phone or the means to pay for a phone call. This fostered increased reliance on support workers and clinicians working in the community to provide or facilitate a primary care appointment. Conclusion The findings have emphasised the importance of addressing practical and technology barriers as well as supporting communication and choice for mode of consultation. The authors argue that consultations should not be remote ‘by default’ and instead take into consideration both the clinical and social factors underpinning health.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2019冠状病毒病大流行期间无家可归者的远程初级保健:一项定性研究
2019冠状病毒病大流行对初级保健组织造成了前所未有的破坏和变化,包括对可能无法使用电话的无家可归者。对于最近向无家可归者提供服务所需的变化是否有助于解决或加剧获得护理方面的不平等,人们知之甚少。目的探讨应对COVID-19的组织和技术变革对无家可归者获得医疗保健的经验和影响。设计和设置在三个案例研究地点采用了以行动为主导的参与式研究方法,这些地点由向无家可归者提供护理的初级保健服务组成。方法对21名无家可归者和22名临床医生及支持人员进行半结构化访谈。访谈采用框架方法进行分析。结果远程电话会诊凸显了参与者在获得医疗服务方面遇到的困难。这些障碍包括与远程分诊相关的实践层面的问题,因为参与者并不总是能够使用电话或支付电话费。这增加了对在社区工作的支持工作者和临床医生的依赖,以提供或促进初级保健预约。结论研究结果强调了解决实际和技术障碍以及支持沟通和选择咨询模式的重要性。这组作者认为,咨询不应该“默认”是远程的,而应该考虑到支撑健康的临床和社会因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: leading the fight in primary care Dealing with symptoms in the general population: lessons learned from the Danish Symptom Cohort Towards new definitions of avoidable hospital admissions Diagnosing myeloma in general practice: how might earlier diagnosis be achieved? General practice and the Medical Licensing Assessment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1