Isovolemic hemodilution alters the ratio of whole-body to large-vessel hematocrit (F-cell ratio). A prospective, randomized study comparing the volume effects of hydroxyethyl starch 200,000/0.62 and albumin.

M. Haller, H. Brechtelsbauer, C. Akbulut, W. Fett, J. Briegel, U. Finsterer
{"title":"Isovolemic hemodilution alters the ratio of whole-body to large-vessel hematocrit (F-cell ratio). A prospective, randomized study comparing the volume effects of hydroxyethyl starch 200,000/0.62 and albumin.","authors":"M. Haller, H. Brechtelsbauer, C. Akbulut, W. Fett, J. Briegel, U. Finsterer","doi":"10.1159/000223103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nTo evaluate potential changes in the ratio of whole-body/large-vessel hematocrit (f-cell ratio) during isovolemic hemodilution and to compare the volume effects of 2 different plasma exchange solutions (hydroxyethyl starch 200,000/0.62 6% and human albumin 5%).\n\n\nDESIGN\nProspective, randomized, controlled trial.\n\n\nSETTING\nOperating theater in a university hospital.\n\n\nPATIENTS\n24 gynecological patients scheduled for elective surgery.\n\n\nINTERVENTIONS\nIsovolemic hemodilution was performed using 2 different plasma exchange solutions. Plasma volume was determined using dye dilution technique before and after hemodilution. The volume of withdrawn blood was measured from the change in weight of the blood bags taking into account the specific gravity of blood.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe volume of administered plasma exchange solutions exceeded the amount of withdrawn blood by 80 +/- 47 ml (p < 0.001). Plasma volume was 3,067 +/- 327 ml before and 3,517 +/- 458 ml after hemodilution. Using red cell volumes calculated from measured plasma volumes and peripheral hematocrit, a deficit of 249 +/- 133 ml (p < 0.0001) in red cells after hemodilution appeared with the measured withdrawn red cell volumes taken into account. This finding can be explained by a change in the f-cell ratio during isovolemic hemodilution. The volume effect of the exchange solutions was 1.05 for hydroxyethyl starch and 0.95 for albumin.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nThe results demonstrate that a change in the f-cell ratio occurs during isovolemic hemodilution. The estimation of red cell volume or plasma volume changes by using either the hematocrit or plasma or red cell volume determinations together with the hematocrit may lead to erroneous results.","PeriodicalId":13632,"journal":{"name":"Infusionstherapie und Transfusionsmedizin","volume":"70 1","pages":"74-80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infusionstherapie und Transfusionsmedizin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000223103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To evaluate potential changes in the ratio of whole-body/large-vessel hematocrit (f-cell ratio) during isovolemic hemodilution and to compare the volume effects of 2 different plasma exchange solutions (hydroxyethyl starch 200,000/0.62 6% and human albumin 5%). DESIGN Prospective, randomized, controlled trial. SETTING Operating theater in a university hospital. PATIENTS 24 gynecological patients scheduled for elective surgery. INTERVENTIONS Isovolemic hemodilution was performed using 2 different plasma exchange solutions. Plasma volume was determined using dye dilution technique before and after hemodilution. The volume of withdrawn blood was measured from the change in weight of the blood bags taking into account the specific gravity of blood. RESULTS The volume of administered plasma exchange solutions exceeded the amount of withdrawn blood by 80 +/- 47 ml (p < 0.001). Plasma volume was 3,067 +/- 327 ml before and 3,517 +/- 458 ml after hemodilution. Using red cell volumes calculated from measured plasma volumes and peripheral hematocrit, a deficit of 249 +/- 133 ml (p < 0.0001) in red cells after hemodilution appeared with the measured withdrawn red cell volumes taken into account. This finding can be explained by a change in the f-cell ratio during isovolemic hemodilution. The volume effect of the exchange solutions was 1.05 for hydroxyethyl starch and 0.95 for albumin. CONCLUSIONS The results demonstrate that a change in the f-cell ratio occurs during isovolemic hemodilution. The estimation of red cell volume or plasma volume changes by using either the hematocrit or plasma or red cell volume determinations together with the hematocrit may lead to erroneous results.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
等容血液稀释可改变全身与大血管红细胞比容(f细胞比)。一项前瞻性,随机研究比较羟乙基淀粉20万/0.62和白蛋白的体积效应。
目的评价等容血液稀释过程中全身/大血管红细胞比容(f细胞比)的潜在变化,并比较2种不同血浆交换液(羟乙基淀粉20万/0.62 6%和人白蛋白5%)的体积效应。前瞻性、随机、对照试验。背景:大学医院的手术室。24例妇科择期手术患者。干预:采用2种不同的血浆交换液进行等容血液稀释。采用染料稀释法测定血液稀释前后血浆容量。取血的体积是根据血袋的重量变化来计算的,同时考虑到血液的比重。结果血浆交换液给药量比采血量多80 +/- 47 ml (p < 0.001)。血液稀释前血浆容量为3067 +/- 327 ml,血液稀释后为3517 +/- 458 ml。使用红细胞总量计算出测量等离子体和外围比容、赤字249 + / - 133毫升(p < 0.0001)与红细胞在血液稀释后出现测量红细胞体积考虑撤回。这一发现可以用等容血稀释过程中f细胞比例的变化来解释。交换液对羟乙基淀粉的体积效应为1.05,对白蛋白的体积效应为0.95。结论等容血液稀释过程中f细胞比例发生变化。用红细胞比容或血浆或红细胞体积测定与红细胞比容一起来估计红细胞体积或血浆体积变化可能会导致错误的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Platelet Concentrates from Automated Apheresis - Past, Present and Future Developments. Arificial Oxygen Carriers as Red Blood Cell Substitutes - Perfluorocarbons and Cell-Free Hemoglobin. Transfusion-Associated Infections with Cytomegalovirus and Other Human Herpesviruses. Comparison of Solvent/Detergent-Inactivated Plasma and Fresh Frozen Plasma under Routine Clinical Conditions. Coexisting Anti-I/i Plus Anti Pr Cold Agglutinins in Individual Sera.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1