Risk of Stroke Associated With Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs: A Nested Case-Control Study

S. Bak, M. Andersen, I. Tsiropoulos, L. G. García Rodríguez, J. Hallas, K. Christensen, D. Gaist
{"title":"Risk of Stroke Associated With Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs: A Nested Case-Control Study","authors":"S. Bak, M. Andersen, I. Tsiropoulos, L. G. García Rodríguez, J. Hallas, K. Christensen, D. Gaist","doi":"10.1161/01.STR.0000053029.45352.A0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Purpose— Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been associated with bleeding complications and may affect the risk of hemorrhagic stroke through inhibition of platelet cyclooxygenase-1. We performed a population-based case-control study to estimate the risk of intracerebral hemorrhage, subarachnoid hemorrhage, and ischemic stroke in users of NSAIDs. Methods— We used a population-based patient registry to identify all patients with a first-ever stroke discharge diagnosis in the period of 1994 to 1999. All diagnoses were validated according to predefined criteria. We selected 40 000 random controls from the background population. Information on drug use for cases and controls was retrieved from a prescription registry. Odds ratios were adjusted for age, sex, calendar year, and use of other medication. To evaluate the effect of various potential confounders not recorded in the register, we performed separate analyses on data from 2 large population-based surveys with more detailed information on risk factors. Results— The cases were classified as intracerebral hemorrhage (n=659), subarachnoid hemorrhage (n=208), and ischemic stroke (n=2717). The adjusted odds ratio of stroke in current NSAID users compared with never users was 1.2 (95% CI, 0.9 to 1.6) for intracerebral hemorrhage, 1.2 (95% CI, 0.7 to 2.1) for subarachnoid hemorrhage and 1.2 (95% confidence interval, 1.0 to 1.4) for ischemic stroke. The survey data indicated that additional confounder control would not have led to an increase in relative risk estimates. Conclusions— Current exposure to NSAIDs is not a risk factor for intracerebral hemorrhage or subarachnoid hemorrhage. Furthermore, NSAIDs probably offer no protection against first-ever ischemic stroke.","PeriodicalId":22274,"journal":{"name":"Stroke: Journal of the American Heart Association","volume":"121 1","pages":"379-386"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"96","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke: Journal of the American Heart Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000053029.45352.A0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 96

Abstract

Background and Purpose— Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been associated with bleeding complications and may affect the risk of hemorrhagic stroke through inhibition of platelet cyclooxygenase-1. We performed a population-based case-control study to estimate the risk of intracerebral hemorrhage, subarachnoid hemorrhage, and ischemic stroke in users of NSAIDs. Methods— We used a population-based patient registry to identify all patients with a first-ever stroke discharge diagnosis in the period of 1994 to 1999. All diagnoses were validated according to predefined criteria. We selected 40 000 random controls from the background population. Information on drug use for cases and controls was retrieved from a prescription registry. Odds ratios were adjusted for age, sex, calendar year, and use of other medication. To evaluate the effect of various potential confounders not recorded in the register, we performed separate analyses on data from 2 large population-based surveys with more detailed information on risk factors. Results— The cases were classified as intracerebral hemorrhage (n=659), subarachnoid hemorrhage (n=208), and ischemic stroke (n=2717). The adjusted odds ratio of stroke in current NSAID users compared with never users was 1.2 (95% CI, 0.9 to 1.6) for intracerebral hemorrhage, 1.2 (95% CI, 0.7 to 2.1) for subarachnoid hemorrhage and 1.2 (95% confidence interval, 1.0 to 1.4) for ischemic stroke. The survey data indicated that additional confounder control would not have led to an increase in relative risk estimates. Conclusions— Current exposure to NSAIDs is not a risk factor for intracerebral hemorrhage or subarachnoid hemorrhage. Furthermore, NSAIDs probably offer no protection against first-ever ischemic stroke.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卒中风险与非甾体抗炎药相关:一项巢式病例对照研究
背景和目的——非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)与出血并发症相关,并可能通过抑制血小板环氧化酶-1影响出血性卒中的风险。我们进行了一项基于人群的病例对照研究,以估计非甾体抗炎药使用者脑出血、蛛网膜下腔出血和缺血性中风的风险。方法:我们使用基于人群的患者登记来确定1994年至1999年期间首次卒中出院诊断的所有患者。所有诊断均根据预先确定的标准进行验证。我们从背景人群中随机选择了4万名对照。病例和对照的药物使用信息从处方登记处检索。比值比根据年龄、性别、日历年和使用其他药物进行调整。为了评估未在登记册中记录的各种潜在混杂因素的影响,我们对来自2个大型人群调查的数据进行了单独分析,这些调查提供了更详细的风险因素信息。结果:脑出血(659例)、蛛网膜下腔出血(208例)、缺血性中风(2717例)。目前使用非甾体抗炎药的患者与从未使用过的患者相比,脑出血的校正优势比为1.2 (95% CI, 0.9 - 1.6),蛛网膜下腔出血的校正优势比为1.2 (95% CI, 0.7 - 2.1),缺血性卒中的校正优势比为1.2(95%置信区间,1.0 - 1.4)。调查数据表明,额外的混杂因素控制不会导致相对风险估计的增加。结论:目前暴露于非甾体抗炎药并不是脑出血或蛛网膜下腔出血的危险因素。此外,非甾体抗炎药可能对首次缺血性中风没有保护作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Preventing Cancer, Cardiovascular Disease, and Diabetes: A Common Agenda for the American Cancer Society, the American Diabetes Association, and the American Heart Association Recurrent Stroke in Patients With Symptomatic Carotid Artery Occlusion Is Associated With High-Volume Flow to the Brain and Increased Collateral Circulation Risk of Stroke Associated With Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs: A Nested Case-Control Study Imaging-Based Decision Making in Thrombolytic Therapy for Ischemic Stroke: Present Status Risk Factors for Falling in Home-Dwelling Older Women With Stroke: The Women’s Health and Aging Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1