Troubling coalitions. Some remarks on the (hardly audible) voice of pro-equality men’s groups in gender equality advocacy

T. Trillò
{"title":"Troubling coalitions. Some remarks on the (hardly audible) voice of pro-equality men’s groups in gender equality advocacy","authors":"T. Trillò","doi":"10.18778/0208-600X.69.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper sets off to outline some reflections on the subject position occupied by pro-equality men’s groups within overarching discourses of gender equality. Discussion makes reference to the cases of Men Engage Europe and Maschile Plurale, two loosely organized networks of men that support gender equality in different ways at the EU supranational-level and the Italian national-level respectively. Fragments of the voices of these organizations were gathered during two semi-structured interview conducted in the context of my doctoral fieldwork. This paper argues that men supporting gender equality attempt to participate in feminism from the difficult position of ‘unspoken’ subjects. More specifically, I argue that the tension between narrative of inclusion and narratives of ‘sisterhood’ within feminism produce overarching discourses of gender equality in which men’s subject position is unspoken. Based on these premises, I attempt to offer some reflections on what is gained and what is perhaps lost in the process.","PeriodicalId":33178,"journal":{"name":"Acta Universitatis Lodziensis Folia Sociologica","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Universitatis Lodziensis Folia Sociologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-600X.69.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper sets off to outline some reflections on the subject position occupied by pro-equality men’s groups within overarching discourses of gender equality. Discussion makes reference to the cases of Men Engage Europe and Maschile Plurale, two loosely organized networks of men that support gender equality in different ways at the EU supranational-level and the Italian national-level respectively. Fragments of the voices of these organizations were gathered during two semi-structured interview conducted in the context of my doctoral fieldwork. This paper argues that men supporting gender equality attempt to participate in feminism from the difficult position of ‘unspoken’ subjects. More specifically, I argue that the tension between narrative of inclusion and narratives of ‘sisterhood’ within feminism produce overarching discourses of gender equality in which men’s subject position is unspoken. Based on these premises, I attempt to offer some reflections on what is gained and what is perhaps lost in the process.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
令人不安的联盟。一些关于支持平等的男性团体在性别平等倡导中的声音(几乎听不见)的评论
本文首先概述了在性别平等的总体话语中,支持平等的男性团体所占据的主体地位的一些思考。讨论中提到了欧洲男性参与组织(Men Engage Europe)和意大利男性参与组织(Maschile Plurale)的案例,这两个组织松散的男性网络分别在欧盟超国家层面和意大利国家层面以不同方式支持性别平等。这些组织的声音片段是在我的博士实地工作背景下进行的两次半结构化访谈中收集的。本文认为,支持性别平等的男性试图从“未言”主体的困境中参与女性主义。更具体地说,我认为在女权主义中,包容叙事和“姐妹情谊”叙事之间的紧张关系产生了性别平等的总体话语,其中男性的主体地位是不言而喻的。基于这些前提,我试图提供一些关于在这个过程中得到什么和可能失去什么的思考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Sztuka w COVIDZIE. Instytucje upowszechniające sztukę współczesną w czasie pandemii i ich publiczność Metaverse and its creative potential for visual arts Pomiędzy mitem i rzeczywistością – zróżnicowanie stanowisk na temat wolności i powinności artysty Lonely, isolated, self-excluded? What is the reason for the absence of male seniors in cultural institutions? Sztuka ultrakonserwatywnego buntu. Analiza dyskursu
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1