Hedges in English and Arabic Metadiscourse Utility in Academic Writing: A Contrastive Analysis

Kheryadi Kheryadi, A. Muin, A. Syahid
{"title":"Hedges in English and Arabic Metadiscourse Utility in Academic Writing: A Contrastive Analysis","authors":"Kheryadi Kheryadi, A. Muin, A. Syahid","doi":"10.24042/albayan.v14i2.12144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This current study has increased the amount of studies on metadiscourse features in English and Arabic, as well as cultural groupings, by examining the usage of hedging in linguistic research articles published in English and Arabic. The technique was qualitative, with a corpus of 40 articles from six linguistics journals used. This study aimed to identify similarities and differences in the use of hedges in native English and native Arabic linguistics research publications. Hyland's taxonomy of metadiscourse markers was used to analyze the language categories. The contrastive analysis of English and Arabic in this article was a systematic investigation of language pairs to uncover differences and similarities. Arabic articles are not more dominant than English articles in the Hidges structure. The result showed that hedges in English is greater than in Arabic research articles. From those findings, it might have a substantial influence on the teaching and learning of Arabic as a foreign language in English context.","PeriodicalId":33142,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Al Bayan Jurnal Jurusan Pendidikan Bahasa Arab","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Al Bayan Jurnal Jurusan Pendidikan Bahasa Arab","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24042/albayan.v14i2.12144","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This current study has increased the amount of studies on metadiscourse features in English and Arabic, as well as cultural groupings, by examining the usage of hedging in linguistic research articles published in English and Arabic. The technique was qualitative, with a corpus of 40 articles from six linguistics journals used. This study aimed to identify similarities and differences in the use of hedges in native English and native Arabic linguistics research publications. Hyland's taxonomy of metadiscourse markers was used to analyze the language categories. The contrastive analysis of English and Arabic in this article was a systematic investigation of language pairs to uncover differences and similarities. Arabic articles are not more dominant than English articles in the Hidges structure. The result showed that hedges in English is greater than in Arabic research articles. From those findings, it might have a substantial influence on the teaching and learning of Arabic as a foreign language in English context.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英语和阿拉伯语限制语在学术写作中的元话语效用对比分析
本研究通过考察以英语和阿拉伯语发表的语言学研究文章中限制语的使用情况,增加了对英语和阿拉伯语元话语特征以及文化分组的研究数量。该技术是定性的,使用了来自6个语言学期刊的40篇文章的语料库。本研究旨在确定母语英语和母语阿拉伯语语言学研究出版物中模糊限制语使用的异同。运用Hyland的元话语标记分类法对语言范畴进行分析。本文对英语和阿拉伯语的对比分析是对语言对的系统考察,以发现两者的异同。在希吉斯结构中,阿拉伯语冠词并不比英语冠词更占优势。结果表明,英语研究论文中的模糊限制语比阿拉伯语研究论文中的模糊限制语要多。从这些发现来看,它可能会对英语背景下阿拉伯语作为外语的教学产生重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Arabic Teaching Curriculum for Indonesian General Educational Stages in the Society Era 5.0 The Education in the Face of Contemporary Challenges of Arabic Language Teaching by Al-Shatiby l Al-Tarbiyyah ‘inda al-Syathibi fi Muwajahati al-Tahaddiyat al-Mu‘asharah fi Ta’limi al-Lughah al-‘Arabiyyah The Influence of Javanese-Arabic Translation Methods by Tafsir Al-Jalalain towards the Students’ Mastery in Nahwu Camtasia Studio-Based Arabic Learning Video Design for Arabic Language Education Students The Stylistic Form and Meaning of Imperative and Prohibition Structures in al-Qira’ah al-Wafiyah Book l Shiyaghu wa Ma‘ani Asalibi al-‘Amr wa al-Nahy fi Kitabi al-Qira’ah al-Wafiyah
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1