With greater popularity comes less responsibility: the popularity fallacy of Big Vs’ public participation on Sina Weibo

IF 2.1 2区 文学 Q2 COMMUNICATION Chinese Journal of Communication Pub Date : 2021-05-03 DOI:10.1080/17544750.2021.1915833
Xue-Fei Yan, Cheng-Jun Wang
{"title":"With greater popularity comes less responsibility: the popularity fallacy of Big Vs’ public participation on Sina Weibo","authors":"Xue-Fei Yan, Cheng-Jun Wang","doi":"10.1080/17544750.2021.1915833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Although popular users are more influential on social media, there may be a popularity fallacy in their public participation. We examined the relationship between the popularity of the most influential verified users (also known as “Big Vs”) of Sina Weibo and their participation in 63 of the most salient public issues from 2013 to 2016. The results support the existence of the popularity fallacy for Big Vs. Although the popularity of Big Vs has an indirect positive impact on their public participation because of the mediation of public influence, their popularity also has a direct negative impact on their public participation. Overall, their popularity hurts their public participation. We further explain the findings from the perspective of Big Vs’ occupational categories and impression management strategies. The results of this study shed light on our understanding of the limited role played by social media in influencing public participation.","PeriodicalId":46367,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Communication","volume":"50 1","pages":"430 - 450"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Communication","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2021.1915833","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract Although popular users are more influential on social media, there may be a popularity fallacy in their public participation. We examined the relationship between the popularity of the most influential verified users (also known as “Big Vs”) of Sina Weibo and their participation in 63 of the most salient public issues from 2013 to 2016. The results support the existence of the popularity fallacy for Big Vs. Although the popularity of Big Vs has an indirect positive impact on their public participation because of the mediation of public influence, their popularity also has a direct negative impact on their public participation. Overall, their popularity hurts their public participation. We further explain the findings from the perspective of Big Vs’ occupational categories and impression management strategies. The results of this study shed light on our understanding of the limited role played by social media in influencing public participation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人气越高,责任越少:新浪微博大v公众参与的人气谬论
虽然人气用户在社交媒体上的影响力更大,但他们的公众参与可能存在人气谬误。我们研究了2013年至2016年间,新浪微博最具影响力的认证用户(也被称为“大v”)的受欢迎程度与他们参与63个最突出的公共问题之间的关系。研究结果支持大v的人气谬论的存在,虽然由于公众影响力的中介作用,大v的人气对其公众参与有间接的正向影响,但其人气对其公众参与也有直接的负向影响。总的来说,他们的受欢迎程度损害了他们的公众参与。我们进一步从大v的职业类别和印象管理策略的角度来解释研究结果。这项研究的结果揭示了我们对社交媒体在影响公众参与方面的有限作用的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
38
期刊最新文献
How do corporate social responsibility perceptions facilitate advocacy behavior? The roles of organizational pride and responsible leadership Exploring freedom in mobile connectivity: a moderated mediation model linking mobile social media modes, availability pressure, and media habits Communicating LGBTQ-supportive CSR for corporate legitimacy: a cultural discourse analysis in Hong Kong Pro-liberalism vs. Nationalism: how critical opinion leaders challenge the persuasive effect of propaganda in China When politics meets dating: how moral concern, utopianism, and communication competence predict willingness to date across the political divide
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1