Acoustic analysis of professional singing masks

IF 1 3区 物理与天体物理 Q4 ACOUSTICS Acta Acustica Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1051/aacus/2022044
Bogac Tur, M. Echternach, Stefan Turowski, Meinard Müller, M. Köberlein, M. Döllinger, S. Kniesburges
{"title":"Acoustic analysis of professional singing masks","authors":"Bogac Tur, M. Echternach, Stefan Turowski, Meinard Müller, M. Köberlein, M. Döllinger, S. Kniesburges","doi":"10.1051/aacus/2022044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Wearing face coverings became one essential tool in order to prohibit virus transmission during the COVID-19 pandemic. In comparison to speaking and breathing, singing emits a much higher amount of aerosol particles. Therefore, there are situations in which singers can perform or rehearse only if they are using protective masks. However, such masks have a more or less adverse effect not only on the singer’s comfort and tightness of the mask but also on the radiated sound. For this reason, the spectral filtering and directivity of masks designed specifically for professional singing was measured. The tests were performed with a head phantom. Over most of the spectrum, attenuation is observed, although amplification happens at some low frequency bands for different mask types and directions. Especially singing masks with a plastic face shield showed partial amplification of up to +10 dB below a frequency of 2 kHz, while only slight significant attenuation and no amplification (minimal acoustic loss) were seen for woven fabric masks. Above 2.5 kHz, the transparent masks showed the greatest sound attenuation up to −30 dB, while woven fabric masks produced an overall lower sound attenuation of up to −5 dB. In addition at low frequencies, the sound was amplified or attenuated equally in all directions for masks with a stiff plastic face shield. At higher frequencies, the attenuation is higher to the frontal than to the backward direction.","PeriodicalId":48486,"journal":{"name":"Acta Acustica","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Acustica","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/aacus/2022044","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Wearing face coverings became one essential tool in order to prohibit virus transmission during the COVID-19 pandemic. In comparison to speaking and breathing, singing emits a much higher amount of aerosol particles. Therefore, there are situations in which singers can perform or rehearse only if they are using protective masks. However, such masks have a more or less adverse effect not only on the singer’s comfort and tightness of the mask but also on the radiated sound. For this reason, the spectral filtering and directivity of masks designed specifically for professional singing was measured. The tests were performed with a head phantom. Over most of the spectrum, attenuation is observed, although amplification happens at some low frequency bands for different mask types and directions. Especially singing masks with a plastic face shield showed partial amplification of up to +10 dB below a frequency of 2 kHz, while only slight significant attenuation and no amplification (minimal acoustic loss) were seen for woven fabric masks. Above 2.5 kHz, the transparent masks showed the greatest sound attenuation up to −30 dB, while woven fabric masks produced an overall lower sound attenuation of up to −5 dB. In addition at low frequencies, the sound was amplified or attenuated equally in all directions for masks with a stiff plastic face shield. At higher frequencies, the attenuation is higher to the frontal than to the backward direction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
专业唱歌面具的声学分析
在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,戴口罩成为防止病毒传播的一项重要工具。与说话和呼吸相比,唱歌会释放出更多的气溶胶颗粒。因此,有些情况下,歌手只有戴上防护面具才能表演或排练。然而,这样的口罩不仅对歌手的舒适性和口罩的密封性有或多或少的不利影响,而且对辐射声音也有影响。为此,测量了专为专业演唱设计的掩模的频谱滤波和指向性。这些测试是用头部假体进行的。在大多数频谱上,衰减被观察到,尽管在一些低频段,不同的掩模类型和方向发生放大。特别是带塑料面罩的歌唱口罩,在2 kHz频率以下的部分放大高达+10 dB,而织物口罩只有轻微的显著衰减,没有放大(最小的声损失)。在2.5 kHz以上,透明掩模的声衰减最大,可达- 30 dB,而编织织物掩模的声衰减总体较低,可达- 5 dB。此外,在低频率下,带有硬塑料面罩的口罩在各个方向上的声音被均匀地放大或衰减。在较高的频率下,正面的衰减比反向的衰减要大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Acustica
Acta Acustica ACOUSTICS-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
21.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Acustica, the Journal of the European Acoustics Association (EAA). After the publication of its Journal Acta Acustica from 1993 to 1995, the EAA published Acta Acustica united with Acustica from 1996 to 2019. From 2020, the EAA decided to publish a journal in full Open Access. See Article Processing charges. Acta Acustica reports on original scientific research in acoustics and on engineering applications. The journal considers review papers, scientific papers, technical and applied papers, short communications, letters to the editor. From time to time, special issues and review articles are also published. For book reviews or doctoral thesis abstracts, please contact the Editor in Chief.
期刊最新文献
Auralization based on multi-perspective ambisonic room impulse responses Amplitude-dependent modal coefficients accounting for localized nonlinear losses in a time-domain integration of woodwind model A direct-hybrid CFD/CAA method based on lattice Boltzmann and acoustic perturbation equations Acta Acustica: State of art and achievements after 3 years Impact of wearing a head-mounted display on localization accuracy of real sound sources
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1