Preference at First Sight: Effects of Shape and Font Qualities on Evaluation of Object-Word Pairs

Olivia S. Cheung, Oliver Heyn, Tobiasz Trawiński
{"title":"Preference at First Sight: Effects of Shape and Font Qualities on Evaluation of Object-Word Pairs","authors":"Olivia S. Cheung, Oliver Heyn, Tobiasz Trawiński","doi":"10.3390/vision6020022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Subjective preferences for visual qualities of shapes and fonts have been separately reported. Such preferences are often similarly attributed to factors such as aesthetic impressions, attributed meaning from the visual properties, or processing fluency. Because shapes and fonts were rarely studied together, we investigated whether these qualities had a similar impact on preference judgment of object-word pairs. Each pair consisted of an abstract object with either preferred or disliked shape qualities and a pseudoword with either preferred or disliked font qualities. We found that only shape qualities, but not font qualities, influenced preference ratings of the object-word pairs, with higher preferences for pairs with preferred than disliked shapes. Moreover, eye movement results indicated that while participants fixated the word before the object, their prolonged fixation on the object when first attending to it might have contributed to the preference ratings. Nonetheless, other measures, including response times, total fixation numbers, and total dwell time, showed different patterns for shape and font qualities, revealing that participants attended more to objects with preferred than disliked shapes, and to words with disliked than preferred fonts. Taken together, these results suggest that shape and font qualities have differential influences on preferences and processing of objects and words.","PeriodicalId":49121,"journal":{"name":"Spatial Vision","volume":"511 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spatial Vision","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/vision6020022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Subjective preferences for visual qualities of shapes and fonts have been separately reported. Such preferences are often similarly attributed to factors such as aesthetic impressions, attributed meaning from the visual properties, or processing fluency. Because shapes and fonts were rarely studied together, we investigated whether these qualities had a similar impact on preference judgment of object-word pairs. Each pair consisted of an abstract object with either preferred or disliked shape qualities and a pseudoword with either preferred or disliked font qualities. We found that only shape qualities, but not font qualities, influenced preference ratings of the object-word pairs, with higher preferences for pairs with preferred than disliked shapes. Moreover, eye movement results indicated that while participants fixated the word before the object, their prolonged fixation on the object when first attending to it might have contributed to the preference ratings. Nonetheless, other measures, including response times, total fixation numbers, and total dwell time, showed different patterns for shape and font qualities, revealing that participants attended more to objects with preferred than disliked shapes, and to words with disliked than preferred fonts. Taken together, these results suggest that shape and font qualities have differential influences on preferences and processing of objects and words.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
第一眼偏好:形状和字体品质对物词对评价的影响
对形状和字体的视觉质量的主观偏好已分别报道。这种偏好通常同样归因于诸如审美印象、视觉属性所赋予的意义或处理流畅性等因素。由于形状和字体很少被放在一起研究,我们调查了这些品质是否对客观词对的偏好判断有相似的影响。每一对都包含一个具有喜欢或不喜欢的形状特性的抽象对象和一个具有喜欢或不喜欢的字体特性的伪单词。我们发现,只有形状的质量,而不是字体的质量,影响了对对象词对的偏好评级,对喜欢的形状的偏好高于不喜欢的形状。此外,眼动结果表明,当参与者在注视物体之前注视单词时,他们第一次注视物体时对物体的长时间注视可能有助于偏好评级。然而,其他测量,包括反应时间、总注视次数和总停留时间,显示了形状和字体质量的不同模式,揭示了参与者更多地关注具有喜欢的形状而不是不喜欢的物体,以及不喜欢的字体而不是喜欢的字体的单词。综上所述,这些结果表明,形状和字体质量对物体和单词的偏好和处理有不同的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Basic Knowledge of Middle School English Teachers in Indonesia in Assessing Students ' Writing Ability ENGLISH FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES IN HIGHER EDUCATION: THE ROLE OF ENGLISH SPESIFIC PURPOSE FOR KNOWING A GOAL OF STUDENT IN MAJORING ENGLISH Developing Youtube Content Using Podcast to Improve Students Speaking Skill The Effectiveness of Quizlet on Teaching Grammar at Eleventh Grade Students of SMA Negeri 1 Bantarsari Cilacap Case Analysis I: Mohalla Clinic: A Case on Healthcare Service Operations and Quality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1