Validation of spectral simulation tools in the context of ipRGC-influenced light responses of building occupants

IF 2.2 4区 工程技术 Q2 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY Journal of Building Performance Simulation Pub Date : 2022-09-26 DOI:10.1080/19401493.2022.2125582
C. Pierson, M. Aarts, M. Andersen
{"title":"Validation of spectral simulation tools in the context of ipRGC-influenced light responses of building occupants","authors":"C. Pierson, M. Aarts, M. Andersen","doi":"10.1080/19401493.2022.2125582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the growing awareness about ipRGC-influenced light (IIL) responses, design applications related to these responses are flourishing. To compare design options and optimize lighting conditions for building occupants, lighting simulations are typically used. However, as our IIL responses depend on the spectral characteristics of light, spectral simulations are required. The goal of this study is to validate two spectral simulation tools, ALFA and Lark, for the study of indoor spaces in relation to occupants’ IIL responses. Indicators associated with IIL responses derived from ALFA- and Lark-simulated data are compared against indicators derived from data measured under indoor daylighting and electric lighting conditions. The results show that Lark outperforms ALFA in most cases, with a simulation error in the ±20% range for point-in-time indicators. When accounting for time dynamics of light exposure, at least 9% of the daylight exposures simulated for a 6-h period in Lark lead to a significant error.","PeriodicalId":49168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Building Performance Simulation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Building Performance Simulation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19401493.2022.2125582","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

With the growing awareness about ipRGC-influenced light (IIL) responses, design applications related to these responses are flourishing. To compare design options and optimize lighting conditions for building occupants, lighting simulations are typically used. However, as our IIL responses depend on the spectral characteristics of light, spectral simulations are required. The goal of this study is to validate two spectral simulation tools, ALFA and Lark, for the study of indoor spaces in relation to occupants’ IIL responses. Indicators associated with IIL responses derived from ALFA- and Lark-simulated data are compared against indicators derived from data measured under indoor daylighting and electric lighting conditions. The results show that Lark outperforms ALFA in most cases, with a simulation error in the ±20% range for point-in-time indicators. When accounting for time dynamics of light exposure, at least 9% of the daylight exposures simulated for a 6-h period in Lark lead to a significant error.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
光谱模拟工具在iprgc影响建筑居住者光响应的背景下的验证
随着人们对iprgc影响的光(IIL)响应的认识不断提高,与这些响应相关的设计应用正在蓬勃发展。为了比较设计方案和优化建筑居住者的照明条件,通常使用照明模拟。然而,由于我们的IIL响应依赖于光的光谱特性,光谱模拟是必需的。本研究的目的是验证两种光谱模拟工具,ALFA和Lark,用于研究室内空间与居住者il反应的关系。从ALFA和lark模拟数据中得出的与IIL响应相关的指标与在室内采光和电力照明条件下测量的数据得出的指标进行了比较。结果表明,Lark在大多数情况下优于ALFA,对于时间点指标的模拟误差在±20%范围内。当考虑光照射的时间动态时,在Lark中模拟的6小时内至少有9%的日光照射会导致显着误差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Building Performance Simulation
Journal of Building Performance Simulation CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
12.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Building Performance Simulation (JBPS) aims to make a substantial and lasting contribution to the international building community by supporting our authors and the high-quality, original research they submit. The journal also offers a forum for original review papers and researched case studies We welcome building performance simulation contributions that explore the following topics related to buildings and communities: -Theoretical aspects related to modelling and simulating the physical processes (thermal, air flow, moisture, lighting, acoustics). -Theoretical aspects related to modelling and simulating conventional and innovative energy conversion, storage, distribution, and control systems. -Theoretical aspects related to occupants, weather data, and other boundary conditions. -Methods and algorithms for optimizing the performance of buildings and communities and the systems which service them, including interaction with the electrical grid. -Uncertainty, sensitivity analysis, and calibration. -Methods and algorithms for validating models and for verifying solution methods and tools. -Development and validation of controls-oriented models that are appropriate for model predictive control and/or automated fault detection and diagnostics. -Techniques for educating and training tool users. -Software development techniques and interoperability issues with direct applicability to building performance simulation. -Case studies involving the application of building performance simulation for any stage of the design, construction, commissioning, operation, or management of buildings and the systems which service them are welcomed if they include validation or aspects that make a novel contribution to the knowledge base.
期刊最新文献
IMPACT pathways – a bottom-up modelling framework to guide sustainable growth and avoid carbon lock-in of cities Evaluation of a building envelope Heat Transfer Coefficient in use: Bayesian approach to improve the inclusion of solar gains Effect of temperature-dependent and hysteretic sorption in computational mould risk analyses of wood fibreboard sheathing A neural network-based surrogate model to predict building features from heating and cooling load signatures Students’ behaviour analysis based on correlating thermal comfort and spatial simulations; case study of a schoolyard in Shiraz City
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1