Equity in online learning

IF 14.3 1区 心理学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Educational Psychologist Pub Date : 2022-06-10 DOI:10.1080/00461520.2022.2062597
Tamara P. Tate, M. Warschauer
{"title":"Equity in online learning","authors":"Tamara P. Tate, M. Warschauer","doi":"10.1080/00461520.2022.2062597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Online learning outcomes have indicated both a gap between online and face-to-face learning and the amplification of this gap for low-income and minority learners. Evidence from studies across K–16 reveals equity issues regarding access to online courses; student attendance and achievement; and, most recently, the impact of the pandemic. This article uses Warschauer’s conceptual framework of resources that shape digital inclusion—physical, human, and social—to conceptualize the equity concerns that arose during the pandemic-induced shift to emergency distance learning. This framework reveals equity issues across all three areas from abruptly moving millions into online learning environments without: requisite access to up-to-date computers and broadband internet access, the skills needed to succeed in less structured online classes, or teachers trained to effectively conduct classes online. Finally, we leverage Warschauer’s framework to discuss ways to address these concerns and increase equity in online learning, as well as directions for research.","PeriodicalId":48361,"journal":{"name":"Educational Psychologist","volume":"73 1","pages":"192 - 206"},"PeriodicalIF":14.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"29","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Psychologist","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2022.2062597","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

Abstract

Abstract Online learning outcomes have indicated both a gap between online and face-to-face learning and the amplification of this gap for low-income and minority learners. Evidence from studies across K–16 reveals equity issues regarding access to online courses; student attendance and achievement; and, most recently, the impact of the pandemic. This article uses Warschauer’s conceptual framework of resources that shape digital inclusion—physical, human, and social—to conceptualize the equity concerns that arose during the pandemic-induced shift to emergency distance learning. This framework reveals equity issues across all three areas from abruptly moving millions into online learning environments without: requisite access to up-to-date computers and broadband internet access, the skills needed to succeed in less structured online classes, or teachers trained to effectively conduct classes online. Finally, we leverage Warschauer’s framework to discuss ways to address these concerns and increase equity in online learning, as well as directions for research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在线学习的公平性
在线学习结果表明,在线学习与面对面学习之间存在差距,并且这种差距在低收入和少数民族学习者中进一步扩大。来自K-16的研究证据揭示了在线课程获取的公平性问题;学生出勤率及成绩;以及最近大流行的影响。本文采用Warschauer的数字包容资源概念框架(物理、人力和社会),将疫情导致的向应急远程学习转变过程中出现的公平性问题概念化。该框架揭示了所有三个领域的公平问题,从突然将数百万人转移到在线学习环境中,而没有:必要的最新计算机和宽带互联网接入,在结构较松散的在线课程中取得成功所需的技能,或接受过有效在线授课培训的教师。最后,我们利用Warschauer的框架来讨论如何解决这些问题,增加在线学习的公平性,以及研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.10
自引率
3.40%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: The Educational Psychologist is a scholarly journal dedicated to exploring the psychology of learning and instruction. Articles in this journal encompass a diverse range of perspectives, from examining psychological mechanisms to exploring social and societal phenomena related to learning and instruction. The journal publishes theoretical and conceptual articles, as well as reviews and meta-analyses, that significantly contribute to theory or advance the methods used to explore educational psychology. Emphasizing innovation and advancing understanding, the journal does not publish articles solely reporting the methods and results of empirical studies; instead, all submissions, including reviews and meta-analyses, must offer clear implications for advancing theory. In addition to regular articles, the journal features special issues that delve into important themes in educational psychology, along with focal articles accompanied by peer commentary.
期刊最新文献
The role of asset-based pedagogy in an interactive view of reading Achieving an adaptive learner The effectiveness of refutation text in confronting scientific misconceptions: A meta-analysis Supporting student voice in science classrooms: The limits of psychosocial approaches and the importance of sociocultural and critical perspectives on student agency A consideration of racial/ethnic diversity conceptualization and measurement: Clarifying ambiguities and advancing scholarship
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1