Evaluation of the effect of diode laser activation on push-out bond strength of different intraorifice barriers in endodontically treated teeth. An in-vitro study

Q3 Dentistry Saudi Endodontic Journal Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.4103/sej.sej_211_22
Rahul S Halkai, Raeesunisa Begum, Kiran R Halkai, S. Zakaullah, S. Indi, Aadil Thimwala, Rahaf A. Almohareb, Fahda N. Algahtani
{"title":"Evaluation of the effect of diode laser activation on push-out bond strength of different intraorifice barriers in endodontically treated teeth. An in-vitro study","authors":"Rahul S Halkai, Raeesunisa Begum, Kiran R Halkai, S. Zakaullah, S. Indi, Aadil Thimwala, Rahaf A. Almohareb, Fahda N. Algahtani","doi":"10.4103/sej.sej_211_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The placement of intraorifice barriers should facilitate proper adhesion; however, it is still a challenge with existing intraorifice barrier materials. Thus, this study aims to evaluate the push-out bond strength of Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC), Tetric-N-Flow, and Biodentine as intraorifice barriers with and without diode laser activation. Materials and Methods: Human-extracted single-rooted 60 mandibular premolars were decoronated to standardize 13 mm root length. Root canal was instrumented with rotary ProTaper universal system till F4 and alternatively irrigated with 5 ml of 2.5% sodium hypochlorite and normal saline, followed by obturation using gutta-percha and AH-plus sealer. About 3.5 mm of gutta-percha was removed from the orifice using peso reamer. Horizontal tooth sections of 3.5 mm in length were obtained from the coronal third of each sample and were randomly divided into three groups (n = 20 each) for intraorifice barrier materials. Group 1: GIC; group 2: Tetric-N-Flow and group 3:Biodentine. Each group was further subdivided into two subgroups A and B (n = 10 each) with and without diode laser. After 7 days, the specimens were mounted in acrylic molds and push-out bond strength was evaluated under universal testing machine. Data analysis was done using One way-analysis of variance and post hoc Tuckey comparison tests (P ≤ 0.05). Results: Laser activation in each group showed greater push-out bond strength; however, Biodentine with laser (group 3A) exhibited higher bond strength compared to all groups (P ≤ 0.05). Conclusion: Biodentine with laser activation before placement of the coronal barrier of endodontic treated tooth increases the quality of bond strength.","PeriodicalId":21485,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Endodontic Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"155 - 159"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Endodontic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/sej.sej_211_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The placement of intraorifice barriers should facilitate proper adhesion; however, it is still a challenge with existing intraorifice barrier materials. Thus, this study aims to evaluate the push-out bond strength of Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC), Tetric-N-Flow, and Biodentine as intraorifice barriers with and without diode laser activation. Materials and Methods: Human-extracted single-rooted 60 mandibular premolars were decoronated to standardize 13 mm root length. Root canal was instrumented with rotary ProTaper universal system till F4 and alternatively irrigated with 5 ml of 2.5% sodium hypochlorite and normal saline, followed by obturation using gutta-percha and AH-plus sealer. About 3.5 mm of gutta-percha was removed from the orifice using peso reamer. Horizontal tooth sections of 3.5 mm in length were obtained from the coronal third of each sample and were randomly divided into three groups (n = 20 each) for intraorifice barrier materials. Group 1: GIC; group 2: Tetric-N-Flow and group 3:Biodentine. Each group was further subdivided into two subgroups A and B (n = 10 each) with and without diode laser. After 7 days, the specimens were mounted in acrylic molds and push-out bond strength was evaluated under universal testing machine. Data analysis was done using One way-analysis of variance and post hoc Tuckey comparison tests (P ≤ 0.05). Results: Laser activation in each group showed greater push-out bond strength; however, Biodentine with laser (group 3A) exhibited higher bond strength compared to all groups (P ≤ 0.05). Conclusion: Biodentine with laser activation before placement of the coronal barrier of endodontic treated tooth increases the quality of bond strength.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
二极管激光激活对牙髓治疗后不同孔内屏障推出结合强度影响的评价。体外研究
引言:孔内屏障的放置应促进适当的粘连;然而,现有的孔内屏障材料仍然是一个挑战。因此,本研究旨在评估玻璃离子水泥(GIC)、Tetric-N-Flow和Biodentine在二极管激光激活和不激活的情况下作为孔内屏障的推出结合强度。材料与方法:将60颗人工拔除的单根下颌前磨牙进行根长13mm的修饰。根管内固定采用ProTaper旋转万能系统至F4,并用5 ml 2.5%次氯酸钠和生理盐水交替冲洗,然后用杜仲胶和AH-plus密封剂封闭。使用比索铰刀从孔中取出约3.5 mm的杜仲胶。从每个样本的冠状面三分之一处获得长度为3.5 mm的水平牙齿切片,随机分为三组(每组n = 20),用于孔内屏障材料。第一组:GIC;2组:Tetric-N-Flow, 3组:Biodentine。每组再细分为A、B两亚组,每亚组10例。7 d后,将试件安装在亚克力模具中,在万能试验机下进行推出粘结强度测试。资料分析采用单因素方差分析和事后Tuckey比较检验(P≤0.05)。结果:激光激活各组均表现出较大的推出键强度;与其他各组相比,激光治疗组(3A组)的结合强度更高(P≤0.05)。结论:牙髓治疗后牙冠状屏障放置前激光激活生物牙妥碱可提高牙髓治疗后牙的粘结质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Saudi Endodontic Journal
Saudi Endodontic Journal Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
32 weeks
期刊介绍: Vision SEJ aims to be one of the foremost worldwide periodical on Endodontics, dedicated to the promotion of research, post-graduate training and further education in Endodontics. Mission Statement To serve as a medium for continued Endodontic education and qualitative scientific publications on clinical trials, basic science related to the biological aspects of Endodontics, basic science related to Endodontic techniques as well as dental trauma that will ultimately improve the Endodontic research and patient’s health. Scope In this journal, Endodontists, Endodontic postgraduate students and general dentists, can learn about new concepts in root canal treatment and the latest advances in techniques and instrumentation that help them keep pace with rapid changes in this field. Aims and Objectives To publish cut edge peer-review original articles, case reports, letters to the editor, editorials, review articles, commentaries, and innovations that will impact on Endodontics. To enhance exchange of ideas/information relating to Endodontics and interaction among stakeholders. To encourage networking and partnership between individuals, government and non-governmental organizations for the provision of quality health care. To advocate for training, workshops, seminars, scientific manuscript writing conferences that will advance publishing culture.
期刊最新文献
Stepwise caries intervention: An approach precursive to endodontic intervention – A case series Adoption of rotary instrumentation among general practitioners in Qassim region, Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional survey Endodontic retreatment of a mesotaurodontic mandibular first molar with C-shaped configuration in a patient with multiple taurodonts: A case report and review of literature Irrigating or irritating – A letter to the editor The prevalence and causes of wrong tooth root canal treatment in Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional survey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1