The Value of Conflicts of Interest Disclosures in Oral Presentations at Major Urological Conferences

Anique Le Roux, N. Touma
{"title":"The Value of Conflicts of Interest Disclosures in Oral Presentations at Major Urological Conferences","authors":"Anique Le Roux, N. Touma","doi":"10.48083/spql8302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this study is to assess the value of disclosure slide reporting at major urology conferences. In total, 557 speakers were evaluated from the conferences of the Canadian Urology Association (n = 36), American Urology Association (n = 160), and European Association of Urology (n = 361) in 2020. Overall, 49.0% of speakers had no disclosure slide. Among speakers presenting a disclosure slide, the median number of conflicts was 5, median time spent on the slide was 4.4 seconds, and 34.8% gave context to disclosures. Overall disclosure slide reporting seems inconsistent, and given how little time is spent on them and the lack of contextualization, their value is unclear.","PeriodicalId":21961,"journal":{"name":"Société Internationale d’Urologie Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Société Internationale d’Urologie Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48083/spql8302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The objective of this study is to assess the value of disclosure slide reporting at major urology conferences. In total, 557 speakers were evaluated from the conferences of the Canadian Urology Association (n = 36), American Urology Association (n = 160), and European Association of Urology (n = 361) in 2020. Overall, 49.0% of speakers had no disclosure slide. Among speakers presenting a disclosure slide, the median number of conflicts was 5, median time spent on the slide was 4.4 seconds, and 34.8% gave context to disclosures. Overall disclosure slide reporting seems inconsistent, and given how little time is spent on them and the lack of contextualization, their value is unclear.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利益冲突披露在泌尿科主要会议口头报告中的价值
本研究的目的是评估在主要泌尿外科会议上披露幻灯片报告的价值。总共有557名演讲者被评估,他们来自2020年加拿大泌尿外科协会(n = 36)、美国泌尿外科协会(n = 160)和欧洲泌尿外科协会(n = 361)的会议。总体而言,49.0%的演讲者没有披露幻灯片。在发表披露幻灯片的演讲者中,冲突的中位数为5次,在幻灯片上花费的中位数时间为4.4秒,34.8%的人给出了披露的背景。整体披露幻灯片报告似乎不一致,考虑到花在它们上面的时间很少,缺乏背景化,它们的价值是不清楚的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Patient Education: A Bladder Cancer Consultation with ChatGPT Perioperative Blood Transfusion Is Associated with Worse Survival in Patients Undergoing Radical Cystectomy after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer RE: Prevalence of MRI Lesions in Men Responding to a GP-Led Invitation for a Prostate Health Check: A Prospective Cohort Study Quality and Readability of Google Search Information on HoLEP for Benign Prostate Hyperplasia A Quality and Completeness Assessment of Testicular Cancer Health Information on TikTok
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1