Cardiac Arrhythmias in Patients with COVID-19 Infection – A Single Center Study

Md. Abu Salim, M. Mahmood, D. Adhikary, S. K. Banerjee, Md. Harisul Hoque, M. Muqueet, Md Fakhrul I Khaled, Walidur Rahman, C. Singha, S. Saha, N. Fatema, Tarek Hasan, Ummel Kulsuma, Mehedi Hassan, Akm Fazlur Rahman
{"title":"Cardiac Arrhythmias in Patients with COVID-19 Infection – A Single Center Study","authors":"Md. Abu Salim, M. Mahmood, D. Adhikary, S. K. Banerjee, Md. Harisul Hoque, M. Muqueet, Md Fakhrul I Khaled, Walidur Rahman, C. Singha, S. Saha, N. Fatema, Tarek Hasan, Ummel Kulsuma, Mehedi Hassan, Akm Fazlur Rahman","doi":"10.3329/uhj.v18i1.57883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Corona virus disease (COVID-19) has been associated with different cardiac complications including cardiac arrhythmias. Arrhythmias carries a great influence on the outcomes. The pathophysiology of these manifestations remain elusive. This study was aimed to observe the incidence and outcome of cardiac arrhythmia in patients with COVID-19 infection from July 2020 to May 2021.\nMethod: We conducted an observational study of patients ³18 years of age with a clinical diagnosis of COVID -19 infection attending Bangabandhu sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU) with and without cardiac arrhythmias from July 2020 to May 2021. Patients were labeled as having arrhythmia if they had sinus bradycardia (heart rate <40 bpm), A-V block, Atrial fibrillation (AF), atrial flutter (AFL), supraventricular tachycardia (SVT), nonsustained VT, sustained VT, ventricular fibrillation (VF). We excluded those patients presented with Acute Coronary syndrome & cardiogenic shock. Different clinical data including demographics, comorbidities (like Hypertension, Diabetes mellitus, Chronic kidney disease, IHD), baseline electrocardiographic and echocardiographic findings, antiviral therapy, use of any proarrhythmic drugs.\nResults: Data was collected from 2264 patients from BSMMU with COVID-19 infection. Among them 158 patients (6.97%) had cardiac arrhythmia, 78 (48.91%) had hypertension, 37 (23.41%) ischaemic heart disease, 31 (19.62%) diabetes, 14 (8.88%) had CKD. Out of 158 patients 53.79% had sinus bradycardia (heart rate £40bpm); 16(10.1%) had first degree AV block; 14 (8.86 %) had 2nd or 3rd degree AV block; 27 (17.08%) had AF; 7 (4.40%) had AFL; 6 (3.7%) had SVT; and 3 (1.89%) of had NSVT. Only one of S. bradycardia patient required temporary pacemaker. 80 (93.75%) did not require any specific treatment and 4 ( 6.25%) was ventilated. 14 (8.86%) had advance AV block, 11 (78.57%) was discharged, 1 (7.14%) required permanent pacemaker and 3 (21.42%) needed mechanical ventilation in addition to standard treatment. 40 (25.31%) had AF/AFL/SVT; all of them were treated with different antiarrhythmic drugs. 40.0% needed mechanical ventilation and 60.0% discharged safely. 3 (1.89%) had NSVT or VT, 2 (66.67%) of them needed mechanical ventilation and 1 (33.33%) was discharged safely. 87.32% patient was discharged safely and 16.4% was ventilated. Among 26 ventilated patients 15 (57.69%) was expired. Out of them 11 (68.75% of 16 patient) had atrial tachyarrhythmia, 2 (100% of 2 patient) had ventricular tachyarrhythmia and 2 (16.67% of 12 patient) had bradyarrhythmia.\nConclusion: COVID-19 infection made a profound negative effect on the lives of millions of people across the world. More than 3 millions of people already died. Lots of patients of COVID-19 infection developed cardiac arrhythmia and was associated with high morbidity and mortality. Appropriate monitoring by ECG with accurate and early identification of arrhythmia is important for better management and outcome.\nUniversity Heart Journal 2022; 18(1): 61-64","PeriodicalId":23424,"journal":{"name":"University Heart Journal","volume":"447 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University Heart Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/uhj.v18i1.57883","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Corona virus disease (COVID-19) has been associated with different cardiac complications including cardiac arrhythmias. Arrhythmias carries a great influence on the outcomes. The pathophysiology of these manifestations remain elusive. This study was aimed to observe the incidence and outcome of cardiac arrhythmia in patients with COVID-19 infection from July 2020 to May 2021. Method: We conducted an observational study of patients ³18 years of age with a clinical diagnosis of COVID -19 infection attending Bangabandhu sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU) with and without cardiac arrhythmias from July 2020 to May 2021. Patients were labeled as having arrhythmia if they had sinus bradycardia (heart rate <40 bpm), A-V block, Atrial fibrillation (AF), atrial flutter (AFL), supraventricular tachycardia (SVT), nonsustained VT, sustained VT, ventricular fibrillation (VF). We excluded those patients presented with Acute Coronary syndrome & cardiogenic shock. Different clinical data including demographics, comorbidities (like Hypertension, Diabetes mellitus, Chronic kidney disease, IHD), baseline electrocardiographic and echocardiographic findings, antiviral therapy, use of any proarrhythmic drugs. Results: Data was collected from 2264 patients from BSMMU with COVID-19 infection. Among them 158 patients (6.97%) had cardiac arrhythmia, 78 (48.91%) had hypertension, 37 (23.41%) ischaemic heart disease, 31 (19.62%) diabetes, 14 (8.88%) had CKD. Out of 158 patients 53.79% had sinus bradycardia (heart rate £40bpm); 16(10.1%) had first degree AV block; 14 (8.86 %) had 2nd or 3rd degree AV block; 27 (17.08%) had AF; 7 (4.40%) had AFL; 6 (3.7%) had SVT; and 3 (1.89%) of had NSVT. Only one of S. bradycardia patient required temporary pacemaker. 80 (93.75%) did not require any specific treatment and 4 ( 6.25%) was ventilated. 14 (8.86%) had advance AV block, 11 (78.57%) was discharged, 1 (7.14%) required permanent pacemaker and 3 (21.42%) needed mechanical ventilation in addition to standard treatment. 40 (25.31%) had AF/AFL/SVT; all of them were treated with different antiarrhythmic drugs. 40.0% needed mechanical ventilation and 60.0% discharged safely. 3 (1.89%) had NSVT or VT, 2 (66.67%) of them needed mechanical ventilation and 1 (33.33%) was discharged safely. 87.32% patient was discharged safely and 16.4% was ventilated. Among 26 ventilated patients 15 (57.69%) was expired. Out of them 11 (68.75% of 16 patient) had atrial tachyarrhythmia, 2 (100% of 2 patient) had ventricular tachyarrhythmia and 2 (16.67% of 12 patient) had bradyarrhythmia. Conclusion: COVID-19 infection made a profound negative effect on the lives of millions of people across the world. More than 3 millions of people already died. Lots of patients of COVID-19 infection developed cardiac arrhythmia and was associated with high morbidity and mortality. Appropriate monitoring by ECG with accurate and early identification of arrhythmia is important for better management and outcome. University Heart Journal 2022; 18(1): 61-64
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19感染患者的心律失常-一项单中心研究
背景:冠状病毒病(COVID-19)与心律失常等不同心脏并发症有关。心律失常对预后有很大影响。这些表现的病理生理学仍然难以捉摸。本研究旨在观察2020年7月至2021年5月COVID-19感染患者心律失常的发生率和转归。方法:我们对2020年7月至2021年5月在Bangabandhu sheikh Mujib医科大学(BSMMU)就诊的临床诊断为COVID -19感染的18岁患者进行了观察性研究,伴有和不伴有心律失常。如果患者有窦性心动过缓(心率<40 bpm)、A-V传导阻滞、心房颤动(AF)、心房扑动(AFL)、室上性心动过速(SVT)、非持续性VT、持续性VT、心室颤动(VF),则被标记为心律失常。我们排除了出现急性冠状动脉综合征和心源性休克的患者。不同的临床数据,包括人口统计学、合并症(如高血压、糖尿病、慢性肾病、IHD)、基线心电图和超声心动图结果、抗病毒治疗、任何抗心律失常药物的使用。结果:收集了2264例BSMMU合并COVID-19感染患者的数据。其中心律失常158例(6.97%),高血压78例(48.91%),缺血性心脏病37例(23.41%),糖尿病31例(19.62%),CKD 14例(8.88%)。158例患者中53.79%有窦性心动过缓(心率£40bpm);1度房室传导阻滞16例(10.1%);2、3度房室传导阻滞14例(8.86%);房颤27例(17.08%);AFL 7例(4.40%);有SVT 6例(3.7%);3例(1.89%)有非svt。仅有1例s型心动过缓患者需要临时起搏器。不需特殊治疗80例(93.75%),通气4例(6.25%)。提前房室传导阻滞14例(8.86%),出院11例(78.57%),需永久性起搏器1例(7.14%),标准治疗外需机械通气3例(21.42%)。AF/AFL/SVT 40例(25.31%);所有患者均给予不同的抗心律失常药物治疗。40.0%需要机械通气,60.0%安全出院。无svt或VT 3例(1.89%),需机械通气2例(66.67%),安全出院1例(33.33%)。87.32%的患者安全出院,16.4%的患者通气。通气患者26例,死亡15例(57.69%)。其中11例(16例中68.75%)为房性心动过速,2例(2例中100%)为室性心动过速,2例(12例中16.67%)为慢性心动过速。结论:COVID-19感染对全球数百万人的生活产生了深远的负面影响。已经有300多万人死亡。大量新冠肺炎患者出现心律失常,发病率和死亡率均较高。适当的心电图监测,准确和早期识别心律失常对更好的管理和结果是重要的。大学心脏杂志2022;18 (1): 61 - 64
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Association of Cardiac Troponin I Levels with the Severity of Coronary Artery Disease in Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Awareness on MINOCA Minimally Invasive Ascending Aortic Replacement with Concomitant Aortic Valve Replacement, A Case Report The outcome of Autogenous Venous Graft Vs Prosthetic Graft in Peripheral Arterial Disease- Study in Bangladesh Correlation between the GRACE Risk Score and the SYNTAX Score in Patients with Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1