Criminal Justice Reform: From Due Process Model to Reintegrative Model as an Alternative to Criminal Case Resolution

H. Hajairin, M. Mustofa, Tofik Yanuar Chandra
{"title":"Criminal Justice Reform: From Due Process Model to Reintegrative Model as an Alternative to Criminal Case Resolution","authors":"H. Hajairin, M. Mustofa, Tofik Yanuar Chandra","doi":"10.59888/ajosh.v1i10.82","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The research problem of this study is the reform of criminal justice from the due process model to the reintegrative model as a consequence of the development of criminal law, including in the resolution of criminal cases. The reintegrative model is a process of establishing new norms or values, as a form of adaptation in the enforcement of criminal law with the approaches of restorative justice, penal mediation, and discretion. The research method used is normative legal research, with statutory, historical, comparative, and conceptual approaches. The results of this study indicate that, firstly, the reform of criminal justice from the due process model to the reintegrative model is an effort to integrate several approaches such as restorative justice, penal mediation, and discretion. This approach is introduced as an effort to minimize the dominance of the due process model. Resolving criminal cases using the due process model is not the only model for resolving criminal cases, but there are many alternatives available. The concept of the reintegrative model emerged due to the numerous issues in law enforcement with the current dominance of the due process model in criminal justice, which focuses on imprisonment as punishment. Secondly, the reintegrative model of criminal justice provides an alternative for resolving criminal cases, with several approaches that can be used and maximized, including restorative justice, penal mediation, and discretion. Restorative justice can be applied in resolving various criminal offenses, penal mediation involves resolving criminal cases outside the court through deliberation and consensus, and police discretion is a justified police action in the interest of the public. However, these approaches are not well-implemented because some still perceive that resolving criminal cases using these approaches is not part of the criminal law enforcement process","PeriodicalId":92175,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of research in social sciences and humanities","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian journal of research in social sciences and humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59888/ajosh.v1i10.82","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The research problem of this study is the reform of criminal justice from the due process model to the reintegrative model as a consequence of the development of criminal law, including in the resolution of criminal cases. The reintegrative model is a process of establishing new norms or values, as a form of adaptation in the enforcement of criminal law with the approaches of restorative justice, penal mediation, and discretion. The research method used is normative legal research, with statutory, historical, comparative, and conceptual approaches. The results of this study indicate that, firstly, the reform of criminal justice from the due process model to the reintegrative model is an effort to integrate several approaches such as restorative justice, penal mediation, and discretion. This approach is introduced as an effort to minimize the dominance of the due process model. Resolving criminal cases using the due process model is not the only model for resolving criminal cases, but there are many alternatives available. The concept of the reintegrative model emerged due to the numerous issues in law enforcement with the current dominance of the due process model in criminal justice, which focuses on imprisonment as punishment. Secondly, the reintegrative model of criminal justice provides an alternative for resolving criminal cases, with several approaches that can be used and maximized, including restorative justice, penal mediation, and discretion. Restorative justice can be applied in resolving various criminal offenses, penal mediation involves resolving criminal cases outside the court through deliberation and consensus, and police discretion is a justified police action in the interest of the public. However, these approaches are not well-implemented because some still perceive that resolving criminal cases using these approaches is not part of the criminal law enforcement process
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
刑事司法改革:从正当程序模式到刑事案件解决的再整合模式
本研究的研究问题是随着刑法的发展,刑事司法从正当程序模式向重新整合模式的改革,包括在刑事案件解决方面的改革。重新整合模式是一个建立新规范或价值的过程,作为一种适应刑法执行的形式,采用恢复性司法、刑事调解和自由裁量权的方法。使用的研究方法是规范性法律研究,包括成文法、历史、比较和概念方法。研究结果表明,首先,刑事司法从正当程序模式向再整合模式的改革是对恢复性司法、刑事调解和自由裁量权等多种途径的整合。引入这种方法是为了尽量减少正当程序模型的主导地位。使用正当程序模式解决刑事案件并不是解决刑事案件的唯一模式,但还有许多可供选择的模式。重新整合模式的概念是由于当前正当程序模式在刑事司法中占主导地位,侧重于监禁作为惩罚,在执法中存在许多问题而产生的。其次,刑事司法的重新整合模式为解决刑事案件提供了另一种选择,有几种可以使用和最大化的方法,包括恢复性司法、刑事调解和自由裁量权。恢复性司法可以用于解决各种刑事犯罪,刑事调解涉及通过审议和协商一致解决庭外刑事案件,警察自由裁量权是为了公众利益而采取的正当警察行动。然而,这些方法没有得到很好的执行,因为一些人仍然认为,使用这些方法解决刑事案件不是刑事执法程序的一部分
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fraud Diamond In Financial Reporting Fraud Detection with Audit Committee as A Moderation Strengthening and Developing Creative Economy Products Based on Regional Potential Resources In The Leading Subsectors of Baubau City Analysis of The Use of Village Funds In Economic Development (Case Study In Pa'bentengan Village, Ererasa District, Bantaeng Regency) Capital Intensity Moderates Corporate Risk and Thin Capitalization of Tax Avoidance Ethnobotany of Medicinal Plants for Infectious Diseases in the Besemah Tribe, Lahat Regency, South Sumatra Province, Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1