Matching reality: A basket and expenditure based choice experiment with sensory preferences

IF 2.4 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Journal of Choice Modelling Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jocm.2022.100369
Clinton L. Neill , Jacob Lahne
{"title":"Matching reality: A basket and expenditure based choice experiment with sensory preferences","authors":"Clinton L. Neill ,&nbsp;Jacob Lahne","doi":"10.1016/j.jocm.2022.100369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article introduces a basket and expenditure based choice experiment design to elicit consumer preferences for multiple products. This design is utilized to imitate a more realistic shopping scenario for consumers when choosing among many different products simultaneously. This approach allows participants to choose both multiple items, in this case vegetables, and related quantities/expenditures to place in a basket of goods. We provide an application of the experimental design to a vegetable choice experiment. This is done in conjunction with a sensory experiment to provide a contextual component to the experiment and econometric model. This type of experiment lends itself to the use of the Multiple Discrete-Continuous Extreme Value (MDCEV) class of models. More specifically, we use the extended version of the MDCEV model proposed by Palma and Hess (2020) that relaxes the need for a budget while also accounting for substitution and complementarity among products. We find that the proposed design and class of econometric methods present a flexible way to analyze consumer choice when the desire is to elicit preferences for a basket of goods rather than simple discrete alternatives or attributes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46863,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Choice Modelling","volume":"44 ","pages":"Article 100369"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755534522000264/pdfft?md5=55ca6270f008075a5908ca6c7008967c&pid=1-s2.0-S1755534522000264-main.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Choice Modelling","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755534522000264","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This article introduces a basket and expenditure based choice experiment design to elicit consumer preferences for multiple products. This design is utilized to imitate a more realistic shopping scenario for consumers when choosing among many different products simultaneously. This approach allows participants to choose both multiple items, in this case vegetables, and related quantities/expenditures to place in a basket of goods. We provide an application of the experimental design to a vegetable choice experiment. This is done in conjunction with a sensory experiment to provide a contextual component to the experiment and econometric model. This type of experiment lends itself to the use of the Multiple Discrete-Continuous Extreme Value (MDCEV) class of models. More specifically, we use the extended version of the MDCEV model proposed by Palma and Hess (2020) that relaxes the need for a budget while also accounting for substitution and complementarity among products. We find that the proposed design and class of econometric methods present a flexible way to analyze consumer choice when the desire is to elicit preferences for a basket of goods rather than simple discrete alternatives or attributes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
匹配现实:基于感官偏好的篮子和支出选择实验
本文介绍了一个基于篮子和支出的选择实验设计,以引出消费者对多种产品的偏好。这个设计是用来模拟一个更真实的购物场景,让消费者同时在许多不同的产品中进行选择。这种方法允许参与者选择多个项目,在这个例子中是蔬菜,以及相关的数量/支出来放置在一篮子商品中。我们将实验设计应用于蔬菜选择实验。这是与感官实验一起完成的,为实验和计量经济模型提供上下文成分。这种类型的实验适合使用多重离散连续极值(MDCEV)类模型。更具体地说,我们使用了Palma和Hess(2020)提出的MDCEV模型的扩展版本,该模型放宽了对预算的需求,同时也考虑了产品之间的替代和互补性。我们发现,所提出的设计和计量经济学方法的类别提供了一种灵活的方法来分析消费者的选择,当欲望是引出对一篮子商品的偏好,而不是简单的离散选择或属性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
31
期刊最新文献
An instrument-free approach for estimating multinomial logit models with endogenous variables Which rubber duck makes the best decoy? Considering the decoy effect on the basis of different behavioral theories On the asymptotic variance of latent class logit models for discrete choice applications Semi-dynamics of electric vehicle adoption based on strategic consumer choices: Preference statement-guided forward-looking behavior based on individual expectations Capturing zero-price effects in stated choice surveys: implications for willingness-to-pay and welfare
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1